Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Attention, votre centre de documentation sera fermé du 27/04 au 12/05 inclus.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Attention, votre centre de documentation sera fermé du 27/04 au 12/05 inclus.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Résultat de la recherche
8 résultat(s) recherche sur le mot-clé 'reliability'
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Reliability of P-drive in occupational therapy following a short training session: A promising instrument measuring seniors’ on-road driving competencies / Paul Vaucher in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Volume 78 numéro 2 (Fébrier 2015)
[article]
Titre : Reliability of P-drive in occupational therapy following a short training session: A promising instrument measuring seniors’ on-road driving competencies Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Paul Vaucher, Auteur ; Cyndia Di Biase, Auteur ; Emma Lobsiger, Auteur Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : p. 131-139 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Ageing Mild cognitive impairment Automobile driving On-road evaluation Reliability Résumé : Introduction Occupational therapists could play an important role in facilitating driving cessation for ageing drivers. This, however, requires an easy-to-learn, standardised on-road evaluation method. This study therefore investigates whether use of ‘P-drive’ could be reliably taught to occupational therapists via a short half-day training session.
Method Using the English 26-item version of P-drive, two occupational therapists evaluated the driving ability of 24 home-dwelling drivers aged 70 years or over on a standardised on-road route. Experienced driving instructors’ on-road, subjective evaluations were then compared with P-drive scores.
Results Following a short half-day training session, P-drive was shown to have almost perfect between-rater reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.950, 95% CI 0.889 to 0.978). Reliability was stable across sessions including the training phase even if occupational therapists seemed to become slightly less severe in their ratings with experience. P-drive’s score was related to the driving instructors’ subjective evaluations of driving skills in a non-linear manner (R 2 = 0.445, p = 0.021).
Conclusion P-drive is a reliable instrument that can easily be taught to occupational therapists and implemented as a way of standardising the on-road driving test.En ligne : http://bjo.sagepub.com/content/78/2.toc Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=35932
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Volume 78 numéro 2 (Fébrier 2015) . - p. 131-139[article] Reliability of P-drive in occupational therapy following a short training session: A promising instrument measuring seniors’ on-road driving competencies [texte imprimé] / Paul Vaucher, Auteur ; Cyndia Di Biase, Auteur ; Emma Lobsiger, Auteur . - 2015 . - p. 131-139.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Volume 78 numéro 2 (Fébrier 2015) . - p. 131-139
Mots-clés : Ageing Mild cognitive impairment Automobile driving On-road evaluation Reliability Résumé : Introduction Occupational therapists could play an important role in facilitating driving cessation for ageing drivers. This, however, requires an easy-to-learn, standardised on-road evaluation method. This study therefore investigates whether use of ‘P-drive’ could be reliably taught to occupational therapists via a short half-day training session.
Method Using the English 26-item version of P-drive, two occupational therapists evaluated the driving ability of 24 home-dwelling drivers aged 70 years or over on a standardised on-road route. Experienced driving instructors’ on-road, subjective evaluations were then compared with P-drive scores.
Results Following a short half-day training session, P-drive was shown to have almost perfect between-rater reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.950, 95% CI 0.889 to 0.978). Reliability was stable across sessions including the training phase even if occupational therapists seemed to become slightly less severe in their ratings with experience. P-drive’s score was related to the driving instructors’ subjective evaluations of driving skills in a non-linear manner (R 2 = 0.445, p = 0.021).
Conclusion P-drive is a reliable instrument that can easily be taught to occupational therapists and implemented as a way of standardising the on-road driving test.En ligne : http://bjo.sagepub.com/content/78/2.toc Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=35932 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtReliability of revised scoring methods for the Schenkenberg Line Bisection Test with adults following stroke: Preliminary findings / Andrew Stone in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 82 Issue 12 (Décembre 2019)
[article]
Titre : Reliability of revised scoring methods for the Schenkenberg Line Bisection Test with adults following stroke: Preliminary findings Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Andrew Stone ; Deirdre Cooke ; Deborah Morton ; Michael Steele Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 750-758 Note générale : doi.org/10.1177/0308022619866377 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Unilateral spatial neglect stroke line bisection assessment reliability occupational therapy Résumé : Introduction
The Schenkenberg Line Bisection Test is a brief screening tool following stroke to assess for unilateral spatial neglect. This assessment takes under five minutes to administer, but scoring using the guidelines of the original authors is lengthy and complex. This study examined the interrater, intrarater, and test–retest reliability of the test using both a brief and detailed method of scoring developed for this study that are more readily used in the clinical setting.
Method
Fifteen participants following stroke were assessed using the Schenkenberg Line Bisection Test. Assessments were scored by four occupational therapists on two separate occasions using both the brief and detailed scoring method developed for this study.
Results
Intraclass correlation coefficients obtained for interrater reliability for the brief scoring method ranged from .89 to 1, and from .82 to .95 for the detailed method. Intraclass correlation coefficients for intrarater reliability ranged from .82 to 1 for the brief method and from .72 to .99 for the detailed method. Strong agreement was observed between first and second assessments in most situations for test–retest reliability.
Conclusion
Preliminary exploration of the revised scoring methods for the Schenkenberg Line Bisection Test demonstrate high reliability and that scoring can be completed relatively quickly in clinical practice.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=85671
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 82 Issue 12 (Décembre 2019) . - p. 750-758[article] Reliability of revised scoring methods for the Schenkenberg Line Bisection Test with adults following stroke: Preliminary findings [texte imprimé] / Andrew Stone ; Deirdre Cooke ; Deborah Morton ; Michael Steele . - 2019 . - p. 750-758.
doi.org/10.1177/0308022619866377
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 82 Issue 12 (Décembre 2019) . - p. 750-758
Mots-clés : Unilateral spatial neglect stroke line bisection assessment reliability occupational therapy Résumé : Introduction
The Schenkenberg Line Bisection Test is a brief screening tool following stroke to assess for unilateral spatial neglect. This assessment takes under five minutes to administer, but scoring using the guidelines of the original authors is lengthy and complex. This study examined the interrater, intrarater, and test–retest reliability of the test using both a brief and detailed method of scoring developed for this study that are more readily used in the clinical setting.
Method
Fifteen participants following stroke were assessed using the Schenkenberg Line Bisection Test. Assessments were scored by four occupational therapists on two separate occasions using both the brief and detailed scoring method developed for this study.
Results
Intraclass correlation coefficients obtained for interrater reliability for the brief scoring method ranged from .89 to 1, and from .82 to .95 for the detailed method. Intraclass correlation coefficients for intrarater reliability ranged from .82 to 1 for the brief method and from .72 to .99 for the detailed method. Strong agreement was observed between first and second assessments in most situations for test–retest reliability.
Conclusion
Preliminary exploration of the revised scoring methods for the Schenkenberg Line Bisection Test demonstrate high reliability and that scoring can be completed relatively quickly in clinical practice.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=85671 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtReproductibilité relative et absolue des points de croisement métabolique et de l’oxydation maximale des lipides lors de l’exercice sur tapis roulant / H. MARZOUKI in Science & sports, vol.29 n°6 (Décembre 2014)
[article]
Titre : Reproductibilité relative et absolue des points de croisement métabolique et de l’oxydation maximale des lipides lors de l’exercice sur tapis roulant Titre original : Relative and absolute reliability of the crossover and maximum fat oxidation points during treadmill running Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : H. MARZOUKI, Auteur Année de publication : 2014 Article en page(s) : p.e107 Langues : Français (fre) Mots-clés : Reliability Crossover point Maximum fat oxidation Maximal aerobic speed Treadmill Aerobic metabolism reproductibilité Point de croisement métabolique Oxydation maximale des lipides Vitesse maximale aérobie Tapis roulant Métabolisme aérobie Résumé : Summary
Objective
was to investigate the relative and absolute reliability of cross over (COP) and maximal lipid oxidation (LIPOXmax) points during treadmill running in sedentary healthy subjects.
Subjects and methods
Twelve sedentary subjects (aged 20.5±1.0 years) performed in random sequence two submaximal graded exercise tests to test the criterion standard for reliability of metabolic tests on treadmill over a time interval of four days. Maximal oxygen intake and maximal aerobic velocity (MAS) were assessed, using a progressive maximal exercise test on a treadmill (Cosmed T170, Germany). Subjects performed two submaximal graded exercise tests (T1 and T2), based on the measured maximal aerobic speed (MAS). Respiratory parameters, the COP and the LIPOXmax points, and the maximal fat oxidation rate (MFO) were measured during these submaximal protocols.
Results
We found no significant differences between T1 and T2 with respect to COP, LIPOXmax and the MFO. Intra-class correlation (ICC) measures of relative reliability were 0.91 for COP, 0.84 for LIPOXmax and 0.803 for MFO. Coefficients of variation (CV) for COP and MFO values between T1 and T2 were low, falling well within the 10% criterion of absolute reliability (CVCOP=9.0%, CVMFO=2.6%). However, LIPOXmax showed greater variability (CV= 15.2%). The standard error of measurement±minimal detectable change (SEM±MDC) values were 0.89±2.08mL.min−1.kg−1, 1.79±4.17mL.min−1.kg−1 and 23.74±65.80mg.min−1 for COP, LIPOXmax and MFO, respectively. The mean differences (bias)±95% limits of agreement (LOA) were 0.4±5.9mL.min−1.kg−1, –0.4±8.8mL.min−1.kg−1 and 10.3±104.05mg.min−1 for COP, LIPOXmax and MFO, respectively.
Conclusion
Our data shows that COP, LIPOXmax, and MFO measurements on a treadmill, over a time interval of four days, are reproducible. These metabolic measurements could be used in sedentary subject to calibrate training intensity.
Résumé
Objectif
Étudier la reproductibilité relative et absolue des points de croisement métabolique (COP) et de l’oxydation maximale des lipides (LIPOXmax) au cours de la course sur tapis roulant chez des sujets sains sédentaires.
Sujets et méthodes
Douze sujets sédentaires (âgés de 20,5±1,0ans) ont effectué dans un ordre aléatoire deux épreuves progressives sous-maximales dans un intervalle de temps de 4jours afin de tester la reproductibilité des tests métaboliques sur tapis roulant. Des mesures de consommation maximale d’oxygène et de la vitesse maximale aérobie ont été réalisées sur tapis roulant (Cosmed T170, Allemagne). Ensuite, les sujets ont effectué deux tests progressifs sous-maximaux (T1 et T2) en se basant sur la vitesse maximale aérobie mesurée (MAS). Des paramètres respiratoires, les points de croisement métabolique (COP) et l’oxydation maximale des lipides (LIPOXmax) ont été mesurés au cours de ces protocoles sous-maximaux.
Résultats
Nous n’avons trouvé aucune différence significative entre T1 et T2 par rapport aux points de COP et de LIPOXmax et le taux maximal d’oxydation des lipides (MFO). Les corrélations intra-classe (CCI) des mesures de la reproductibilité étaient de 0,91 pour le COP, de 0,84 pour le LIPOXmax et de 0,803 pour le MFO. Les coefficients de variation (CV) du COP et les valeurs de MFO entre T1 et T2 étaient faibles, se trouvant dans le critère de 10 % de la reproductibilité absolue (CV pour le COP=9,0 %, CV pour le MFO=2,6 %). Cependant, le LIPOXmax a montré une grande variabilité (CV=15,2 %). L’erreur-type de mesure±changement minimal détectable (SEM±MDC) étaient de 0,89±2,08mL.min−1.kg−1, 1,79±4,17mL.min−1.kg−1 et 23,74±65,80mg.min−1 pour le COP, le LIPOXmax et le MFO respectivement. Les différences moyennes (biais)±95 % des limites de l’agrément (LOA) étaient de 0,4±5,9mL.min−1.kg−1, –0,4±8,8mL.min−1.kg−1 et 10,3±104,05mg.min−1 pour le COP, le LIPOXmax et le MFO respectivement.
Conclusion
Nos données montrent que le COP, le LIPOXmax et le MFO mesurés sur un tapis roulant dans un intervalle de temps de 4jours, sont reproductibles. Ces indices métaboliques peuvent être utilisés chez le sujet sédentaire pour calibrer l’intensité de l’entraînement.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=34201
in Science & sports > vol.29 n°6 (Décembre 2014) . - p.e107[article] Reproductibilité relative et absolue des points de croisement métabolique et de l’oxydation maximale des lipides lors de l’exercice sur tapis roulant = Relative and absolute reliability of the crossover and maximum fat oxidation points during treadmill running [texte imprimé] / H. MARZOUKI, Auteur . - 2014 . - p.e107.
Langues : Français (fre)
in Science & sports > vol.29 n°6 (Décembre 2014) . - p.e107
Mots-clés : Reliability Crossover point Maximum fat oxidation Maximal aerobic speed Treadmill Aerobic metabolism reproductibilité Point de croisement métabolique Oxydation maximale des lipides Vitesse maximale aérobie Tapis roulant Métabolisme aérobie Résumé : Summary
Objective
was to investigate the relative and absolute reliability of cross over (COP) and maximal lipid oxidation (LIPOXmax) points during treadmill running in sedentary healthy subjects.
Subjects and methods
Twelve sedentary subjects (aged 20.5±1.0 years) performed in random sequence two submaximal graded exercise tests to test the criterion standard for reliability of metabolic tests on treadmill over a time interval of four days. Maximal oxygen intake and maximal aerobic velocity (MAS) were assessed, using a progressive maximal exercise test on a treadmill (Cosmed T170, Germany). Subjects performed two submaximal graded exercise tests (T1 and T2), based on the measured maximal aerobic speed (MAS). Respiratory parameters, the COP and the LIPOXmax points, and the maximal fat oxidation rate (MFO) were measured during these submaximal protocols.
Results
We found no significant differences between T1 and T2 with respect to COP, LIPOXmax and the MFO. Intra-class correlation (ICC) measures of relative reliability were 0.91 for COP, 0.84 for LIPOXmax and 0.803 for MFO. Coefficients of variation (CV) for COP and MFO values between T1 and T2 were low, falling well within the 10% criterion of absolute reliability (CVCOP=9.0%, CVMFO=2.6%). However, LIPOXmax showed greater variability (CV= 15.2%). The standard error of measurement±minimal detectable change (SEM±MDC) values were 0.89±2.08mL.min−1.kg−1, 1.79±4.17mL.min−1.kg−1 and 23.74±65.80mg.min−1 for COP, LIPOXmax and MFO, respectively. The mean differences (bias)±95% limits of agreement (LOA) were 0.4±5.9mL.min−1.kg−1, –0.4±8.8mL.min−1.kg−1 and 10.3±104.05mg.min−1 for COP, LIPOXmax and MFO, respectively.
Conclusion
Our data shows that COP, LIPOXmax, and MFO measurements on a treadmill, over a time interval of four days, are reproducible. These metabolic measurements could be used in sedentary subject to calibrate training intensity.
Résumé
Objectif
Étudier la reproductibilité relative et absolue des points de croisement métabolique (COP) et de l’oxydation maximale des lipides (LIPOXmax) au cours de la course sur tapis roulant chez des sujets sains sédentaires.
Sujets et méthodes
Douze sujets sédentaires (âgés de 20,5±1,0ans) ont effectué dans un ordre aléatoire deux épreuves progressives sous-maximales dans un intervalle de temps de 4jours afin de tester la reproductibilité des tests métaboliques sur tapis roulant. Des mesures de consommation maximale d’oxygène et de la vitesse maximale aérobie ont été réalisées sur tapis roulant (Cosmed T170, Allemagne). Ensuite, les sujets ont effectué deux tests progressifs sous-maximaux (T1 et T2) en se basant sur la vitesse maximale aérobie mesurée (MAS). Des paramètres respiratoires, les points de croisement métabolique (COP) et l’oxydation maximale des lipides (LIPOXmax) ont été mesurés au cours de ces protocoles sous-maximaux.
Résultats
Nous n’avons trouvé aucune différence significative entre T1 et T2 par rapport aux points de COP et de LIPOXmax et le taux maximal d’oxydation des lipides (MFO). Les corrélations intra-classe (CCI) des mesures de la reproductibilité étaient de 0,91 pour le COP, de 0,84 pour le LIPOXmax et de 0,803 pour le MFO. Les coefficients de variation (CV) du COP et les valeurs de MFO entre T1 et T2 étaient faibles, se trouvant dans le critère de 10 % de la reproductibilité absolue (CV pour le COP=9,0 %, CV pour le MFO=2,6 %). Cependant, le LIPOXmax a montré une grande variabilité (CV=15,2 %). L’erreur-type de mesure±changement minimal détectable (SEM±MDC) étaient de 0,89±2,08mL.min−1.kg−1, 1,79±4,17mL.min−1.kg−1 et 23,74±65,80mg.min−1 pour le COP, le LIPOXmax et le MFO respectivement. Les différences moyennes (biais)±95 % des limites de l’agrément (LOA) étaient de 0,4±5,9mL.min−1.kg−1, –0,4±8,8mL.min−1.kg−1 et 10,3±104,05mg.min−1 pour le COP, le LIPOXmax et le MFO respectivement.
Conclusion
Nos données montrent que le COP, le LIPOXmax et le MFO mesurés sur un tapis roulant dans un intervalle de temps de 4jours, sont reproductibles. Ces indices métaboliques peuvent être utilisés chez le sujet sédentaire pour calibrer l’intensité de l’entraînement.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=34201 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtTest-retest reliability of the Battery for the Assessment of Auditory Sensorimotor and Timing Abilities (BAASTA) / Valentin Bégel in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 61, n°6 (Novembre 2018)
[article]
Titre : Test-retest reliability of the Battery for the Assessment of Auditory Sensorimotor and Timing Abilities (BAASTA) Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Valentin Bégel ; Laura Verga ; Charles-Etienne Benoit ; et al. Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 395-400 Note générale : Doi : 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.04.001 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Rhythm perception Rhythm performance Sensorimotor synchronization Reliability Test-retest Timing Rhythm Résumé : Highlights
Rhythm skills can be tested with perceptual and finger tapping tasks.
These tasks are implemented in the BAASTA battery.
We assessed test-retest reliability of BAASTA in 20 healthy adults.
Despite high inter-individual variability, BAASTA was found as a reliable tool.
Abstract
Perceptual and sensorimotor timing skills can be thoroughly assessed with the Battery for the Assessment of Auditory Sensorimotor and Timing Abilities (BAASTA). The battery has been used for testing rhythmic skills in healthy adults and patient populations (e.g., with Parkinson disease), showing sensitivity to timing and rhythm deficits. Here we assessed the test-retest reliability of the BAASTA in 20 healthy adults. Participants were tested twice with the BAASTA, implemented on a tablet interface, with a 2-week interval. They completed 4 perceptual tasks, namely, duration discrimination, anisochrony detection with tones and music, and the Beat Alignment Test (BAT). Moreover, they completed motor tasks via finger tapping, including unpaced and paced tapping with tones and music, synchronization-continuation, and adaptive tapping to a sequence with a tempo change. Despite high variability among individuals, the results showed good test-retest reliability in most tasks. A slight but significant improvement from test to retest was found in tapping with music, which may reflect a learning effect. In general, the BAASTA was found a reliable tool for evaluating timing and rhythm skills.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=82391
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 61, n°6 (Novembre 2018) . - p. 395-400[article] Test-retest reliability of the Battery for the Assessment of Auditory Sensorimotor and Timing Abilities (BAASTA) [texte imprimé] / Valentin Bégel ; Laura Verga ; Charles-Etienne Benoit ; et al. . - 2018 . - p. 395-400.
Doi : 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.04.001
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 61, n°6 (Novembre 2018) . - p. 395-400
Mots-clés : Rhythm perception Rhythm performance Sensorimotor synchronization Reliability Test-retest Timing Rhythm Résumé : Highlights
Rhythm skills can be tested with perceptual and finger tapping tasks.
These tasks are implemented in the BAASTA battery.
We assessed test-retest reliability of BAASTA in 20 healthy adults.
Despite high inter-individual variability, BAASTA was found as a reliable tool.
Abstract
Perceptual and sensorimotor timing skills can be thoroughly assessed with the Battery for the Assessment of Auditory Sensorimotor and Timing Abilities (BAASTA). The battery has been used for testing rhythmic skills in healthy adults and patient populations (e.g., with Parkinson disease), showing sensitivity to timing and rhythm deficits. Here we assessed the test-retest reliability of the BAASTA in 20 healthy adults. Participants were tested twice with the BAASTA, implemented on a tablet interface, with a 2-week interval. They completed 4 perceptual tasks, namely, duration discrimination, anisochrony detection with tones and music, and the Beat Alignment Test (BAT). Moreover, they completed motor tasks via finger tapping, including unpaced and paced tapping with tones and music, synchronization-continuation, and adaptive tapping to a sequence with a tempo change. Despite high variability among individuals, the results showed good test-retest reliability in most tasks. A slight but significant improvement from test to retest was found in tapping with music, which may reflect a learning effect. In general, the BAASTA was found a reliable tool for evaluating timing and rhythm skills.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=82391 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtThe Housing Enabler instrument: Assessing threats to reliability and validity / Lizette Norin in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 82 Issue 1 (Janvier 2019)
[article]
Titre : The Housing Enabler instrument: Assessing threats to reliability and validity Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Lizette Norin ; Susanne Iwarsson ; Maria Haak ; Björn Slaug Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 48-59 Note générale : doi.org/10.1177/0308022618782329 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Reliability validity Housing Enabler instrument occupational therapy Résumé : Introduction
The Housing Enabler instrument, designed to measure housing accessibility, has not been used in samples with long-standing spinal cord injury. We aimed to investigate potential threats to the reliability and validity of the instrument when used among older adults with spinal cord injury.
Method
Cross-sectional data from the Swedish Aging with Spinal Cord Injury Study (N = 123, injury levels C1–L5) were utilised. The potential effect on the reliability and content validity of the House Enabler was qualitatively considered and reviewed in an iterative evaluation procedure. To analyse the potential effect on construct validity, simulations adjusting accessibility problem scores for housing adaptations and use of mobility devices were conducted.
Findings
Considerable threats to the reliability and content validity of the Housing Enabler were identified. The simulated analysis of construct validity showed a modest overall effect on the accessibility problem scores, although this was substantial in some individuals.
Conclusion
Data collection and analyses of housing accessibility with the Housing Enabler in samples characterised by high frequencies of housing adaptations and/or use of mobility devices (such as powered wheelchairs) require particular attention. Further studies are needed to propose optimisation of the instrument for use in such contexts, followed by psychometric testing to maintain reliability and validity.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80295
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 82 Issue 1 (Janvier 2019) . - p. 48-59[article] The Housing Enabler instrument: Assessing threats to reliability and validity [texte imprimé] / Lizette Norin ; Susanne Iwarsson ; Maria Haak ; Björn Slaug . - 2019 . - p. 48-59.
doi.org/10.1177/0308022618782329
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 82 Issue 1 (Janvier 2019) . - p. 48-59
Mots-clés : Reliability validity Housing Enabler instrument occupational therapy Résumé : Introduction
The Housing Enabler instrument, designed to measure housing accessibility, has not been used in samples with long-standing spinal cord injury. We aimed to investigate potential threats to the reliability and validity of the instrument when used among older adults with spinal cord injury.
Method
Cross-sectional data from the Swedish Aging with Spinal Cord Injury Study (N = 123, injury levels C1–L5) were utilised. The potential effect on the reliability and content validity of the House Enabler was qualitatively considered and reviewed in an iterative evaluation procedure. To analyse the potential effect on construct validity, simulations adjusting accessibility problem scores for housing adaptations and use of mobility devices were conducted.
Findings
Considerable threats to the reliability and content validity of the Housing Enabler were identified. The simulated analysis of construct validity showed a modest overall effect on the accessibility problem scores, although this was substantial in some individuals.
Conclusion
Data collection and analyses of housing accessibility with the Housing Enabler in samples characterised by high frequencies of housing adaptations and/or use of mobility devices (such as powered wheelchairs) require particular attention. Further studies are needed to propose optimisation of the instrument for use in such contexts, followed by psychometric testing to maintain reliability and validity.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80295 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtValidity and reliability of the Persian ABILHAND-Kids in a sample of Iranian children with cerebralpalsy / Elham Mohammadkhani-Pordanjani
PermalinkBarthel Index and modified Rankin Scale : Psychometric properties during medication phases in idiopathic Parkinson disease / Ghorban Taghizadeh in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 63, n°6 (November 20)
PermalinkA Rasch analysis of the model of human occupation screening tool single observation form (MOHOST-SOF) in mental health / Donald Maciver in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol.79 N°1 (January 2016)
Permalink