Dépouillements

Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 in people with lower limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training / Franco Franchignoni in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 137-141 Titre : Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 in people with lower limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Franco Franchignoni ; Marco Traballesi ; Marco Monticone ; Andrea Giordano ; Stefano Brunelli ; Giorgio Ferriero Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 137-141 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.02.004 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Lower-limb amputation  Leg prosthesis  Outcome assessment  Psychometrics  Rehabilitation  Prosthetic training Résumé : Objective To determine the sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the self-administered Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 (LCI-5) in people with lower limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training. Design Prospective single-group observational study. Methods The LCI-5 was administered to 110 patients (69 males [63%]; median [interquartile range] age, 60 [48–69] years) before and after prosthetic training. The external anchor administered after the program was a 7-point Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS) designed to quantify the effect (improvement or deterioration) of the intervention. Results Test–retest reliability of the LCI-5 (n = 30) was high (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2,1] = 0.92). The minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level was 5.66 points. After triangulating these results with those of the mean-change approach and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the ROC curve ≥ 0.90), based on a different GRCS score splitting, we identified 2 cutoffs for the LCI-5: a change of 7 points, indicating the MCID, and 12 points, indicating “large improvement” in locomotor capabilities (12.5% and 21.4% of the maximum possible score, respectively). Conclusions The LCI-5 showed a high ability to detect change over time (responsiveness). The 2 proposed values (MCID of 7 points and large improvement of 12 points), based on a mix of distribution- and anchor-based approaches, represent cutoffs that can accurately identify 2 different levels of true change (as perceived by the patient) in locomotor capability after prosthetic training. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84110 [article] Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 in people with lower limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training [texte imprimé] / Franco Franchignoni ; Marco Traballesi ; Marco Monticone ; Andrea Giordano ; Stefano Brunelli ; Giorgio Ferriero . - 2019 . - p. 137-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.02.004 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 137-141 Mots-clés : Lower-limb amputation  Leg prosthesis  Outcome assessment  Psychometrics  Rehabilitation  Prosthetic training Résumé : Objective To determine the sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the self-administered Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 (LCI-5) in people with lower limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training. Design Prospective single-group observational study. Methods The LCI-5 was administered to 110 patients (69 males [63%]; median [interquartile range] age, 60 [48–69] years) before and after prosthetic training. The external anchor administered after the program was a 7-point Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS) designed to quantify the effect (improvement or deterioration) of the intervention. Results Test–retest reliability of the LCI-5 (n = 30) was high (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2,1] = 0.92). The minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level was 5.66 points. After triangulating these results with those of the mean-change approach and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the ROC curve ≥ 0.90), based on a different GRCS score splitting, we identified 2 cutoffs for the LCI-5: a change of 7 points, indicating the MCID, and 12 points, indicating “large improvement” in locomotor capabilities (12.5% and 21.4% of the maximum possible score, respectively). Conclusions The LCI-5 showed a high ability to detect change over time (responsiveness). The 2 proposed values (MCID of 7 points and large improvement of 12 points), based on a mix of distribution- and anchor-based approaches, represent cutoffs that can accurately identify 2 different levels of true change (as perceived by the patient) in locomotor capability after prosthetic training. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84110

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

Transcultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility 12-item Short-Form (PLUS-M/FC-12) in active amputees / Christos Karatzios in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 142-148 Titre : Transcultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility 12-item Short-Form (PLUS-M/FC-12) in active amputees Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Christos Karatzios ; Isabelle Loiret ; François Luthi ; Bertrand Leger ; Joane Le Carre ; Mathieu Saubade ; Guillaume Muff ; Charles Benaïm Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 142-148 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.02.006 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Lower limb amputation  Rehabilitation  Mobility  Assessment  Validation  Self-questionnaire Résumé : Background The PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form is a self-questionnaire that assesses the perceived capacity of lower limb amputees (LLAs) to perform a number of daily-life activities. Its psychometric properties are excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.9, fast administration and scoring, normative data available), and it can be used in clinical practice or for research purposes. Objective We aimed to develop a French version of this questionnaire and to assess its psychometric properties. Methods We followed international recommendations for translation and cross-cultural validation of questionnaires. In total, 52 LLAs (age 53 ± 16, 40 males, 28/12/12 transtibial/Gritti-Stokes/transfemoral, 20/28/4 ischemic/traumatic/other) participated. Criterion and construct validities were assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) between the PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form and other constructs (Prosthetic-Profile-of-the-Amputee-Locomotor Capabilities Index, Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, 2-min walking test and Timed Up and Go test), internal consistency with the Cronbach α and reliability with the ICC in 46 individuals who completed the questionnaire twice in a 7-day interval. Results The mean (SD) PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form T-score was 56.1 (7.8; range 40.3 to 71.4). Construct and criterion validity, internal consistency and reliability ranged from low to excellent (r = 0.43 to 0.84, P < 10−2 to 0.002; Cronbach α = 0.90, ICC = 0.89 [0.81–0.94]). We found no floor or ceiling effect. Conclusions The French version of the PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form has good to excellent psychometric properties, comparable to those of the original version. Its use could definitely be proposed for both clinical and research purposes, once its validation is completed by assessing other psychometric qualities, especially sensitivity to change. En ligne : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065719300363 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84111 [article] Transcultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility 12-item Short-Form (PLUS-M/FC-12) in active amputees [texte imprimé] / Christos Karatzios ; Isabelle Loiret ; François Luthi ; Bertrand Leger ; Joane Le Carre ; Mathieu Saubade ; Guillaume Muff ; Charles Benaïm . - 2019 . - p. 142-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.02.006 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 142-148 Mots-clés : Lower limb amputation  Rehabilitation  Mobility  Assessment  Validation  Self-questionnaire Résumé : Background The PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form is a self-questionnaire that assesses the perceived capacity of lower limb amputees (LLAs) to perform a number of daily-life activities. Its psychometric properties are excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.9, fast administration and scoring, normative data available), and it can be used in clinical practice or for research purposes. Objective We aimed to develop a French version of this questionnaire and to assess its psychometric properties. Methods We followed international recommendations for translation and cross-cultural validation of questionnaires. In total, 52 LLAs (age 53 ± 16, 40 males, 28/12/12 transtibial/Gritti-Stokes/transfemoral, 20/28/4 ischemic/traumatic/other) participated. Criterion and construct validities were assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) between the PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form and other constructs (Prosthetic-Profile-of-the-Amputee-Locomotor Capabilities Index, Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, 2-min walking test and Timed Up and Go test), internal consistency with the Cronbach α and reliability with the ICC in 46 individuals who completed the questionnaire twice in a 7-day interval. Results The mean (SD) PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form T-score was 56.1 (7.8; range 40.3 to 71.4). Construct and criterion validity, internal consistency and reliability ranged from low to excellent (r = 0.43 to 0.84, P < 10−2 to 0.002; Cronbach α = 0.90, ICC = 0.89 [0.81–0.94]). We found no floor or ceiling effect. Conclusions The French version of the PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form has good to excellent psychometric properties, comparable to those of the original version. Its use could definitely be proposed for both clinical and research purposes, once its validation is completed by assessing other psychometric qualities, especially sensitivity to change. En ligne : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065719300363 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84111

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

French version of the Mini BESTest: A translation and transcultural adaptation study incorporating a reliability analysis for individuals with sensorimotor impairments undergoing functional rehabilitation / Jean-François Lemay in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 149-154 Titre : French version of the Mini BESTest: A translation and transcultural adaptation study incorporating a reliability analysis for individuals with sensorimotor impairments undergoing functional rehabilitation Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Jean-François Lemay ; Audrey Roy ; Sylvie Nadeau ; Dany H. Gagnon Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 149-154 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.12.001 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Translations  Cross-cultural comparison  Outcome assessment  Reproducibility of results  Postural balance  Rehabilitation Résumé : The Mini BESTest has been developed to comprehensively examine postural control in individuals with various pathologies treated by rehabilitation professionals. However, no formal French version of the Mini BESTest is available. This study aimed to translate and transculturally adapt the Mini BESTest to French and verify its intra- and inter-rater reliability. Translation and transcultural adaptation was performed in accordance with established guidelines, which included 2 initial translations and transcultural adaptations of the Mini BESTest to French that were then merged, a backward English translation, a subsequent adapted French version resolving discrepancies between the English versions, and pilot testing the final version by French-speaking physical therapists. In total, 20 participants with sensorimotor impairments with various etiologies and able to stand for at least 30 sec without human or technical assistance were video-recorded during evaluation with the Mini BESTest. From this video-recording, we calculated inter-rater and intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.974–0.988), internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.895–0.929), standard error of measurement (1.05 and 1.63), and minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence interval (2.91 and 4.51). All values were comparable to those previously reported for the original version of the Mini BESTest. Furthermore, no significant ceiling or floor effect was detected. Therefore, the translated and transculturally adapted version of the Mini BESTest in French compares well to the original version and can be used by French-speaking rehabilitation professionals to examine postural control. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84112 [article] French version of the Mini BESTest: A translation and transcultural adaptation study incorporating a reliability analysis for individuals with sensorimotor impairments undergoing functional rehabilitation [texte imprimé] / Jean-François Lemay ; Audrey Roy ; Sylvie Nadeau ; Dany H. Gagnon . - 2019 . - p. 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.12.001 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 149-154 Mots-clés : Translations  Cross-cultural comparison  Outcome assessment  Reproducibility of results  Postural balance  Rehabilitation Résumé : The Mini BESTest has been developed to comprehensively examine postural control in individuals with various pathologies treated by rehabilitation professionals. However, no formal French version of the Mini BESTest is available. This study aimed to translate and transculturally adapt the Mini BESTest to French and verify its intra- and inter-rater reliability. Translation and transcultural adaptation was performed in accordance with established guidelines, which included 2 initial translations and transcultural adaptations of the Mini BESTest to French that were then merged, a backward English translation, a subsequent adapted French version resolving discrepancies between the English versions, and pilot testing the final version by French-speaking physical therapists. In total, 20 participants with sensorimotor impairments with various etiologies and able to stand for at least 30 sec without human or technical assistance were video-recorded during evaluation with the Mini BESTest. From this video-recording, we calculated inter-rater and intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.974–0.988), internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.895–0.929), standard error of measurement (1.05 and 1.63), and minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence interval (2.91 and 4.51). All values were comparable to those previously reported for the original version of the Mini BESTest. Furthermore, no significant ceiling or floor effect was detected. Therefore, the translated and transculturally adapted version of the Mini BESTest in French compares well to the original version and can be used by French-speaking rehabilitation professionals to examine postural control. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84112

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

Determining the minimal clinically important difference of the hand function sort questionnaire in vocational rehabilitation / Zineb Benhissen in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 155-160 Titre : Determining the minimal clinically important difference of the hand function sort questionnaire in vocational rehabilitation Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Zineb Benhissen ; Michel Konzelmann ; Philippe Vuistiner ; Bertrand Leger ; François Luthi ; Charles Benaïm Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 155-160 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.11.003 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Treatment outcome  Surveys and questionnaires  Upper extremity  Recovery of function  Rehabilitation Résumé : Objective To estimate the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of the French version of the Hand Function Sort questionnaire (HFS-F). As a comparison, the MCID of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) was also estimated. Materials and methods We included French-speaking patients hospitalized in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for chronic pain of the upper limb after an accident. HFS-F and DASH scores were collected at admission and discharge; the Patient Global Impression of Change measure (PGIC; 7 levels) was collected at discharge. The MCID was estimated by 2 methods: the anchor-based method (receiver operating characteristic [ROC], delta (Δ) mean of scores) and the objective method based on the distribution of scores (standard error of measurement, SEM). Result We included 225 patients. By the anchor-based method, the MCID for the HFS-F and DASH was +26 (SD 35) (P < 10−4) and −13 (SD 13) (P < 10−4), respectively, and by the ROC curve, it was +10 to +12 for the Δ-HFS-F and −7.5 to −5 for the Δ-DASH. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.726 [0.638–0.781] for Δ-HFS-F and 0.768 [0.701–0.83] for Δ-DASH. The correlations between the anchor and delta scores were > 0.38 (P < 10−4). The SEM was 16.2 for the HFS-F and −4.3 for the DASH. Conclusions Values below the SEM must be rejected. Our anchor was significantly correlated with the outcome. Therefore, we propose an MCID for the HFS-F of 26, corresponding to approximately 10% progression of the score. En ligne : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065718314969 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84113 [article] Determining the minimal clinically important difference of the hand function sort questionnaire in vocational rehabilitation [texte imprimé] / Zineb Benhissen ; Michel Konzelmann ; Philippe Vuistiner ; Bertrand Leger ; François Luthi ; Charles Benaïm . - 2019 . - p. 155-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.11.003 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 155-160 Mots-clés : Treatment outcome  Surveys and questionnaires  Upper extremity  Recovery of function  Rehabilitation Résumé : Objective To estimate the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of the French version of the Hand Function Sort questionnaire (HFS-F). As a comparison, the MCID of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) was also estimated. Materials and methods We included French-speaking patients hospitalized in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for chronic pain of the upper limb after an accident. HFS-F and DASH scores were collected at admission and discharge; the Patient Global Impression of Change measure (PGIC; 7 levels) was collected at discharge. The MCID was estimated by 2 methods: the anchor-based method (receiver operating characteristic [ROC], delta (Δ) mean of scores) and the objective method based on the distribution of scores (standard error of measurement, SEM). Result We included 225 patients. By the anchor-based method, the MCID for the HFS-F and DASH was +26 (SD 35) (P < 10−4) and −13 (SD 13) (P < 10−4), respectively, and by the ROC curve, it was +10 to +12 for the Δ-HFS-F and −7.5 to −5 for the Δ-DASH. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.726 [0.638–0.781] for Δ-HFS-F and 0.768 [0.701–0.83] for Δ-DASH. The correlations between the anchor and delta scores were > 0.38 (P < 10−4). The SEM was 16.2 for the HFS-F and −4.3 for the DASH. Conclusions Values below the SEM must be rejected. Our anchor was significantly correlated with the outcome. Therefore, we propose an MCID for the HFS-F of 26, corresponding to approximately 10% progression of the score. En ligne : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065718314969 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84113

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

Canadian-French adaptation and test-retest reliability of the leisure time physical activity questionnaire for people with disabilities / Isabelle Cummings in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 161-167 Titre : Canadian-French adaptation and test-retest reliability of the leisure time physical activity questionnaire for people with disabilities Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Isabelle Cummings ; Marie-Eve Lamontagne ; Shane N. Sweet ; Michael Spivock ; Sèbiyo Charles Batcho Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 161-167 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.12.002 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Physical activity  Physical disability  French translation  Content validity  Test-retest reliability Résumé : Objectives The Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire (LTPAQ) measures the duration of physical activities performed during the past 7 days, and results are expressed in minutes. This study aimed to translate this questionnaire into Canadian-French and to evaluate the content validity and its test-retest reliability in people with physical disabilities. Methods The LTPAQ was translated from English to French by forward and backward translation. To assess content validity, 9 adults with physical disabilities read and provided comments regarding the relevance, wording and understanding of the items of the preliminary Canadian-French version of the questionnaire. For test-retest reliability, 37 adults with physical disabilities completed the questionnaire 2 or 3 times at T1 (baseline), T2 (2 days from baseline) and T3 (7 days from baseline). The test–retest reliability was investigated by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), paired t test and Bland and Altman tests. Results The translation and the content validation process resulted in a Canadian-French version of the LTPAQ (LTPAQ-CF). Total LTPAQ-CF scores between T1-T2 and T1-T3 featured strong ICCs, 0.90 and 0.75 (P ≤ 0.01). Paired t tests and Bland and Altman analyses confirmed the good reproducibility of results. Conclusion The LTPAQ-CF has good test–retest reliability when self-administered or administered by interview to people with physical disabilities. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84114 [article] Canadian-French adaptation and test-retest reliability of the leisure time physical activity questionnaire for people with disabilities [texte imprimé] / Isabelle Cummings ; Marie-Eve Lamontagne ; Shane N. Sweet ; Michael Spivock ; Sèbiyo Charles Batcho . - 2019 . - p. 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.12.002 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 161-167 Mots-clés : Physical activity  Physical disability  French translation  Content validity  Test-retest reliability Résumé : Objectives The Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire (LTPAQ) measures the duration of physical activities performed during the past 7 days, and results are expressed in minutes. This study aimed to translate this questionnaire into Canadian-French and to evaluate the content validity and its test-retest reliability in people with physical disabilities. Methods The LTPAQ was translated from English to French by forward and backward translation. To assess content validity, 9 adults with physical disabilities read and provided comments regarding the relevance, wording and understanding of the items of the preliminary Canadian-French version of the questionnaire. For test-retest reliability, 37 adults with physical disabilities completed the questionnaire 2 or 3 times at T1 (baseline), T2 (2 days from baseline) and T3 (7 days from baseline). The test–retest reliability was investigated by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), paired t test and Bland and Altman tests. Results The translation and the content validation process resulted in a Canadian-French version of the LTPAQ (LTPAQ-CF). Total LTPAQ-CF scores between T1-T2 and T1-T3 featured strong ICCs, 0.90 and 0.75 (P ≤ 0.01). Paired t tests and Bland and Altman analyses confirmed the good reproducibility of results. Conclusion The LTPAQ-CF has good test–retest reliability when self-administered or administered by interview to people with physical disabilities. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84114

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

Cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) in upper-limb prosthesis users / Helena Burger in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 168-173 Titre : Cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) in upper-limb prosthesis users Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Helena Burger ; Andrea Giordano ; Maja Mlakar ; Caterina Albensi ; Darinka Brezovar ; Franco Franchignoni Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 168-173 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.03.003 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Patient satisfaction  Upper extremity  Prosthesis  Outcome assessment  Questionnaire  Rehabilitation Résumé : Objective To validate the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) 8-item Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) questionnaire in upper-limb prosthesis users and to further verify measurement properties of this tool with Rasch analysis. Design Participants consisted of a convenience sample of 76 adults (54 men) using a prosthesis after unilateral upper-limb amputation who consecutively attended a follow-up visit at our centre. Methods After translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the CSD into the Slovene language, we evaluated functioning of the rating scale categories, item fit (internal construct validity), reliability indices and dimensionality, as well as convergent and discriminant construct validity of the questionnaire. Results Rasch analysis indicated that: (1) functioning of the 4 response options was acceptable; (2) all items fitted the measured construct [information-weighted (infit) and outlier-sensitive (outfit) mean-square statistics 0.60 to 1.40]; (3) person separation reliability was 0.62 (and Cronbach α = 0.76), item separation reliability was 0.83; (4) on principal component analysis (PCA) on the standardised residuals, the CSD showed borderline but acceptable unidimensionality and no local item dependency. Moreover, as expected, the CSD score showed good correlation with the QUEST 2.0 score (rs = 0.57) and little to fair correlation with the OPUS Upper Extremity Functional Status score (rs = 0.21). Conclusion The metric properties of the Slovene version of CSD agree with previous studies. The present study confirms the validity of CSD for measuring patient satisfaction with an upper-limb device, enhances the confidence in this tool for assessing upper-limb prosthesis users, and contributes to further refining the technical quality of this measure. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84115 [article] Cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) in upper-limb prosthesis users [texte imprimé] / Helena Burger ; Andrea Giordano ; Maja Mlakar ; Caterina Albensi ; Darinka Brezovar ; Franco Franchignoni . - 2019 . - p. 168-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.03.003 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 168-173 Mots-clés : Patient satisfaction  Upper extremity  Prosthesis  Outcome assessment  Questionnaire  Rehabilitation Résumé : Objective To validate the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) 8-item Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) questionnaire in upper-limb prosthesis users and to further verify measurement properties of this tool with Rasch analysis. Design Participants consisted of a convenience sample of 76 adults (54 men) using a prosthesis after unilateral upper-limb amputation who consecutively attended a follow-up visit at our centre. Methods After translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the CSD into the Slovene language, we evaluated functioning of the rating scale categories, item fit (internal construct validity), reliability indices and dimensionality, as well as convergent and discriminant construct validity of the questionnaire. Results Rasch analysis indicated that: (1) functioning of the 4 response options was acceptable; (2) all items fitted the measured construct [information-weighted (infit) and outlier-sensitive (outfit) mean-square statistics 0.60 to 1.40]; (3) person separation reliability was 0.62 (and Cronbach α = 0.76), item separation reliability was 0.83; (4) on principal component analysis (PCA) on the standardised residuals, the CSD showed borderline but acceptable unidimensionality and no local item dependency. Moreover, as expected, the CSD score showed good correlation with the QUEST 2.0 score (rs = 0.57) and little to fair correlation with the OPUS Upper Extremity Functional Status score (rs = 0.21). Conclusion The metric properties of the Slovene version of CSD agree with previous studies. The present study confirms the validity of CSD for measuring patient satisfaction with an upper-limb device, enhances the confidence in this tool for assessing upper-limb prosthesis users, and contributes to further refining the technical quality of this measure. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84115

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

Cross-cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures: A solution or a problem? / V. Prakash in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 174-177 Titre : Cross-cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures: A solution or a problem? Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : V. Prakash ; S. Shah ; K. Hariohm Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 174-177 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.01.006 Langues : Anglais (eng) Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84116 [article] Cross-cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures: A solution or a problem? [texte imprimé] / V. Prakash ; S. Shah ; K. Hariohm . - 2019 . - p. 174-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.01.006 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 174-177 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84116

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

Comparison between the STarT Back Screening Tool and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire: Which tool for what purpose? A semi-systematic review / Alexis Lheureux in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 178-188 Titre : Comparison between the STarT Back Screening Tool and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire: Which tool for what purpose? A semi-systematic review Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Alexis Lheureux ; Anne Berquin Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 178-188 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.09.007 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST)  Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (OMPSQ)  Low back pain  Predicting questionnaires Résumé : Background Prevention of chronicization of low back pain requires accurate detection of at-risk patients. Questionnaires have been validated, including the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (OMPSQ). This review aims to compare these questionnaires in terms of predictive value and in terms of aims, to guide the choice in clinical practice. Methods This study is a semi-systematic literature review. Studies evaluating at least one of the questionnaires and written between 1997 and October 10th 2017 were selected from Pubmed database. Inclusion criteria were pain duration < 3 months, outcomes including pain, function and/or global recovery. For work outcomes, inclusion criteria were extended to chronic patients. Studies had to provide information on sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC Curve (AUC). Results Twenty-eight studies met our inclusion criteria (7 SBST, 21 original OMPSQ, 3 short OMPSQ). The OMPSQ best predicted a Pain NRS ≥ 3 at 3 months (AUC = 0.64 (0.50–0.78)) and at 6 months (AUC between 0.70 (no confidence interval provided) and 0.84 (0.71–0.97)). The SBST and the OMPSQ are comparable to predict an Oswestry Disability Index ≥ 30% at 6 months. A single study showed no difference between the SBST and the OMPSQ to predict absenteeism ≥ 30 days at 6 months. The two questionnaires cannot be compared for “global recovery” outcomes. Conclusion The OMPSQ seems better than the SBST for predicting “pain” and “work” outcomes, the SBST may be better for “function” outcomes. These results should be taken with caution because of the high heterogeneity between studies. It should be noted that the OMPSQ was elaborated with the aim of creating a prognostic tool while the SBST was devised as a treatment-allocating tool and is easier to use in clinical practice. This should guide the choice of using one questionnaire rather than the other. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84117 [article] Comparison between the STarT Back Screening Tool and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire: Which tool for what purpose? A semi-systematic review [texte imprimé] / Alexis Lheureux ; Anne Berquin . - 2019 . - p. 178-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.09.007 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 178-188 Mots-clés : STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST)  Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (OMPSQ)  Low back pain  Predicting questionnaires Résumé : Background Prevention of chronicization of low back pain requires accurate detection of at-risk patients. Questionnaires have been validated, including the STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (OMPSQ). This review aims to compare these questionnaires in terms of predictive value and in terms of aims, to guide the choice in clinical practice. Methods This study is a semi-systematic literature review. Studies evaluating at least one of the questionnaires and written between 1997 and October 10th 2017 were selected from Pubmed database. Inclusion criteria were pain duration < 3 months, outcomes including pain, function and/or global recovery. For work outcomes, inclusion criteria were extended to chronic patients. Studies had to provide information on sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC Curve (AUC). Results Twenty-eight studies met our inclusion criteria (7 SBST, 21 original OMPSQ, 3 short OMPSQ). The OMPSQ best predicted a Pain NRS ≥ 3 at 3 months (AUC = 0.64 (0.50–0.78)) and at 6 months (AUC between 0.70 (no confidence interval provided) and 0.84 (0.71–0.97)). The SBST and the OMPSQ are comparable to predict an Oswestry Disability Index ≥ 30% at 6 months. A single study showed no difference between the SBST and the OMPSQ to predict absenteeism ≥ 30 days at 6 months. The two questionnaires cannot be compared for “global recovery” outcomes. Conclusion The OMPSQ seems better than the SBST for predicting “pain” and “work” outcomes, the SBST may be better for “function” outcomes. These results should be taken with caution because of the high heterogeneity between studies. It should be noted that the OMPSQ was elaborated with the aim of creating a prognostic tool while the SBST was devised as a treatment-allocating tool and is easier to use in clinical practice. This should guide the choice of using one questionnaire rather than the other. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84117

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

Blocking neuromuscular junctions with botulinum toxin A injection enhances neurological heterotopic ossification development after spinal cord injury in mice / Marjorie Salga in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 189-192 Titre : Blocking neuromuscular junctions with botulinum toxin A injection enhances neurological heterotopic ossification development after spinal cord injury in mice Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Marjorie Salga ; Hsu-Wen Tseng ; Kylie A. Alexander ; Beulah Jose ; Cedryck Vaquette ; Charlotte Debaud ; Laure Gatin Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 189-192 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.01.005 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Neurogenic heterotopic ossification  Spinal cord injury  Botulinum toxin type a  Osteogenesis Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84118 [article] Blocking neuromuscular junctions with botulinum toxin A injection enhances neurological heterotopic ossification development after spinal cord injury in mice [texte imprimé] / Marjorie Salga ; Hsu-Wen Tseng ; Kylie A. Alexander ; Beulah Jose ; Cedryck Vaquette ; Charlotte Debaud ; Laure Gatin . - 2019 . - p. 189-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.01.005 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 189-192 Mots-clés : Neurogenic heterotopic ossification  Spinal cord injury  Botulinum toxin type a  Osteogenesis Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84118

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

Structural connectivity changes within the basal ganglia after 8 weeks of sensory-motor training in individuals with chronic stroke / Tania Zastron in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 193-197 Titre : Structural connectivity changes within the basal ganglia after 8 weeks of sensory-motor training in individuals with chronic stroke Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Tania Zastron ; Simon S. Kessner ; Karsten Hollander ; Götz Thomalla ; Karen Estelle Welman Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 193-197 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.02.002 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Postural control  Stroke  Rehabilitation  Reorganization  Structural neuroplasticity Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84119 [article] Structural connectivity changes within the basal ganglia after 8 weeks of sensory-motor training in individuals with chronic stroke [texte imprimé] / Tania Zastron ; Simon S. Kessner ; Karsten Hollander ; Götz Thomalla ; Karen Estelle Welman . - 2019 . - p. 193-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.02.002 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 193-197 Mots-clés : Postural control  Stroke  Rehabilitation  Reorganization  Structural neuroplasticity Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84119

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

Sensorimotor plasticity in response to predictable visual stimuli could correct the signs of spatial neglect / Jordan Pierce in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 198-199 Titre : Sensorimotor plasticity in response to predictable visual stimuli could correct the signs of spatial neglect Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Jordan Pierce ; Camille Ricou ; Marine Thomasson ; Arnaud Saj Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 198-199 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.11.002 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Spatial neglect  Spatial remapping  Attention  Visual-motor learning Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84120 [article] Sensorimotor plasticity in response to predictable visual stimuli could correct the signs of spatial neglect [texte imprimé] / Jordan Pierce ; Camille Ricou ; Marine Thomasson ; Arnaud Saj . - 2019 . - p. 198-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.11.002 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 198-199 Mots-clés : Spatial neglect  Spatial remapping  Attention  Visual-motor learning Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84120

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

Needs of individuals with tetraplegia and expectations regarding implanted neuroprosthesis / Wafa Tigra in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 200-202 Titre : Needs of individuals with tetraplegia and expectations regarding implanted neuroprosthesis Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Wafa Tigra Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 200-202 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.01.004 Langues : Anglais (eng) Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84121 [article] Needs of individuals with tetraplegia and expectations regarding implanted neuroprosthesis [texte imprimé] / Wafa Tigra . - 2019 . - p. 200-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.01.004 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 200-202 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84121

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

Ultrasonographic Imaging of the medial and lateral pouches in the knee: EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM protocol(s) revisited / Vincenzo Ricci in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 203-204 Titre : Ultrasonographic Imaging of the medial and lateral pouches in the knee: EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM protocol(s) revisited Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Vincenzo Ricci Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 203-204 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.09.002 Langues : Anglais (eng) Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84122 [article] Ultrasonographic Imaging of the medial and lateral pouches in the knee: EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM protocol(s) revisited [texte imprimé] / Vincenzo Ricci . - 2019 . - p. 203-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.09.002 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 203-204 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84122

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt