Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur George Tomlin |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Beyond research literature: Occupational therapists’ perspectives on and uses of “evidence” in everyday practice / Deborah A. Dougherty in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83(5) (Décembre 2016)
[article]
Titre : Beyond research literature: Occupational therapists’ perspectives on and uses of “evidence” in everyday practice Titre original : Au-delà de la littérature scientifique : Les perspectives des ergothérapeutes sur les « faits probants » et leur usage dans la pratique quotidienne Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Deborah A. Dougherty ; Susan E. Toth-Cohen ; George Tomlin Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : p. 288-296 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : ergothérapie pratique centrée sur le client pratique fondée sur les faits probants raisonnement clinique recherche qualitative Résumé : Background.
Recent literature in evidence-based practice indicates that evidence is defined differently from practice and research perspectives. However, few published works address therapists’ perspectives of the nature and use of evidence in everyday practice.
Purpose.
This study describes the definition, types, and use of evidence from the perspective of six school-based occupational therapists.
Method.
Data were collected through focus groups and participant-submitted documentation and analyzed using qualitative and quantitative content analysis.
Findings.
Two categories of evidence emerged: internalized evidence and evidence gathered during the intervention process. Clinical reasoning, identified as a key skill in evidence-based practice, supported the synthesis of therapist internalized evidence with “in-the-moment” evidence gathered from activity, contextual, and occupational analyses of the client.
Implications.
The findings support current literature that has suggested expanding the definition of evidence (i.e., more than research findings alone). Further investigation of evidence building in practice may help in constructing a more inclusive professional culture of evidence-based practice.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47798
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(5) (Décembre 2016) . - p. 288-296[article] Beyond research literature: Occupational therapists’ perspectives on and uses of “evidence” in everyday practice = Au-delà de la littérature scientifique : Les perspectives des ergothérapeutes sur les « faits probants » et leur usage dans la pratique quotidienne [texte imprimé] / Deborah A. Dougherty ; Susan E. Toth-Cohen ; George Tomlin . - 2016 . - p. 288-296.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(5) (Décembre 2016) . - p. 288-296
Mots-clés : ergothérapie pratique centrée sur le client pratique fondée sur les faits probants raisonnement clinique recherche qualitative Résumé : Background.
Recent literature in evidence-based practice indicates that evidence is defined differently from practice and research perspectives. However, few published works address therapists’ perspectives of the nature and use of evidence in everyday practice.
Purpose.
This study describes the definition, types, and use of evidence from the perspective of six school-based occupational therapists.
Method.
Data were collected through focus groups and participant-submitted documentation and analyzed using qualitative and quantitative content analysis.
Findings.
Two categories of evidence emerged: internalized evidence and evidence gathered during the intervention process. Clinical reasoning, identified as a key skill in evidence-based practice, supported the synthesis of therapist internalized evidence with “in-the-moment” evidence gathered from activity, contextual, and occupational analyses of the client.
Implications.
The findings support current literature that has suggested expanding the definition of evidence (i.e., more than research findings alone). Further investigation of evidence building in practice may help in constructing a more inclusive professional culture of evidence-based practice.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47798 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtContent Analysis of Qualitative Research on Children and Youth With Autism, 1993–2011: Considerations for Occupational Therapy Services / Yvonne Swinth in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 69/5 (Septembre-Octobre 2015)
[article]
Titre : Content Analysis of Qualitative Research on Children and Youth With Autism, 1993–2011: Considerations for Occupational Therapy Services Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Yvonne Swinth, Auteur ; George Tomlin, Auteur ; Marge Luthman, Auteur Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : p.6905185030p1-6905185030p9 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autistic disorder child family occupational therapist Résumé : OBJECTIVE: Through a content analysis of qualitative research published 1993–2011, we sought to determine how qualitative research can inform clinical reasoning among occupational therapy practitioners to support evidence-based, occupation-focused services for children and youth with autism and their families.
METHOD: A qualitative literature search of journals inside and outside occupational therapy, including international journals, yielded 125 articles. We reviewed 110 articles that met inclusion criteria, 79 of which were coded by four occupational therapists with experience working with families with a child or youth with autism.
RESULTS: Nineteen content codes were initially derived. Three themes were identified: (1) service challenges for the family, (2) day-to-day experience of autism, and (3) reframing family.
CONCLUSION: This content analysis illustrates how qualitative research may help occupational therapy practitioners make comprehensive, occupation-based intervention decisions by considering the lived experience of children and youth with autism and their families.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=40866
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 69/5 (Septembre-Octobre 2015) . - p.6905185030p1-6905185030p9[article] Content Analysis of Qualitative Research on Children and Youth With Autism, 1993–2011: Considerations for Occupational Therapy Services [texte imprimé] / Yvonne Swinth, Auteur ; George Tomlin, Auteur ; Marge Luthman, Auteur . - 2015 . - p.6905185030p1-6905185030p9.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 69/5 (Septembre-Octobre 2015) . - p.6905185030p1-6905185030p9
Mots-clés : Autistic disorder child family occupational therapist Résumé : OBJECTIVE: Through a content analysis of qualitative research published 1993–2011, we sought to determine how qualitative research can inform clinical reasoning among occupational therapy practitioners to support evidence-based, occupation-focused services for children and youth with autism and their families.
METHOD: A qualitative literature search of journals inside and outside occupational therapy, including international journals, yielded 125 articles. We reviewed 110 articles that met inclusion criteria, 79 of which were coded by four occupational therapists with experience working with families with a child or youth with autism.
RESULTS: Nineteen content codes were initially derived. Three themes were identified: (1) service challenges for the family, (2) day-to-day experience of autism, and (3) reframing family.
CONCLUSION: This content analysis illustrates how qualitative research may help occupational therapy practitioners make comprehensive, occupation-based intervention decisions by considering the lived experience of children and youth with autism and their families.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=40866 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtContribution of Qualitative Research to Evidence in Practice for People With Autism Spectrum Disorder / George Tomlin in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 69/5 (Septembre-Octobre 2015)
[article]
Titre : Contribution of Qualitative Research to Evidence in Practice for People With Autism Spectrum Disorder Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : George Tomlin, Auteur ; Yvonne Swinth, Auteur Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : p.6905360010p1-6905360010p4 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder autistic disorder child family Résumé : Appraising the best available evidence substantiating and informing occupational therapy practice is a commonly expressed obligation for the profession (American Occupational Therapy Association [AOTA], 2007). In this article we argue for the full inclusion of qualitative research, on parity with quantitative research, as a source for evidence of relevant and effective occupational therapy practice, review the limitations of quantitative research, and outline the distinctive contributions of qualitative studies to the practice of occupational therapy for people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In addition, we describe the role of qualitative studies in the fulfillment of the Centennial Vision (AOTA, 2007) and recommend three action steps for the profession. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=40876
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 69/5 (Septembre-Octobre 2015) . - p.6905360010p1-6905360010p4[article] Contribution of Qualitative Research to Evidence in Practice for People With Autism Spectrum Disorder [texte imprimé] / George Tomlin, Auteur ; Yvonne Swinth, Auteur . - 2015 . - p.6905360010p1-6905360010p4.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 69/5 (Septembre-Octobre 2015) . - p.6905360010p1-6905360010p4
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder autistic disorder child family Résumé : Appraising the best available evidence substantiating and informing occupational therapy practice is a commonly expressed obligation for the profession (American Occupational Therapy Association [AOTA], 2007). In this article we argue for the full inclusion of qualitative research, on parity with quantitative research, as a source for evidence of relevant and effective occupational therapy practice, review the limitations of quantitative research, and outline the distinctive contributions of qualitative studies to the practice of occupational therapy for people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In addition, we describe the role of qualitative studies in the fulfillment of the Centennial Vision (AOTA, 2007) and recommend three action steps for the profession. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=40876 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtResearch pyramid / George Tomlin in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 65/2 (mars-avril 2011)
[article]
Titre : Research pyramid : a new evidence-based practice model for occupational therapy Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : George Tomlin ; Bernhard BORGETTO Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p. 189-196 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Médecine fondée sur les preuves Ergothérapie Résumé : In the campaign to implement evidence-based practice, the current single-hierarchy model of levels of evidence fails to incorporate at parity all types of research evidence that are valuable in the practice of occupational therapy. A new model, originally developed by Borgetto et al. (2007) and modified and expanded, is presented. By separating the evidence-level criteria of internal and external validity, by incorporating explicitly the evidence provided by qualitative studies, and by retaining the critical notion of rigor, a pyramidal evidence model emerges. This model, the Research Pyramid, aligns itself with the revised model of evidence-based medicine and, more important, with the basic modes of clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. It constitutes a beginning attempt to order evidence-based practice in accordance with the epistemology of the profession. It may better guide occupational therapy research and meta-synthesis and their incorporation into practice decisions. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14220
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 65/2 (mars-avril 2011) . - p. 189-196[article] Research pyramid : a new evidence-based practice model for occupational therapy [texte imprimé] / George Tomlin ; Bernhard BORGETTO . - 2011 . - p. 189-196.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 65/2 (mars-avril 2011) . - p. 189-196
Mots-clés : Médecine fondée sur les preuves Ergothérapie Résumé : In the campaign to implement evidence-based practice, the current single-hierarchy model of levels of evidence fails to incorporate at parity all types of research evidence that are valuable in the practice of occupational therapy. A new model, originally developed by Borgetto et al. (2007) and modified and expanded, is presented. By separating the evidence-level criteria of internal and external validity, by incorporating explicitly the evidence provided by qualitative studies, and by retaining the critical notion of rigor, a pyramidal evidence model emerges. This model, the Research Pyramid, aligns itself with the revised model of evidence-based medicine and, more important, with the basic modes of clinical reasoning in occupational therapy. It constitutes a beginning attempt to order evidence-based practice in accordance with the epistemology of the profession. It may better guide occupational therapy research and meta-synthesis and their incorporation into practice decisions. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14220 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Réserve Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes
Exclu du prêt