Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Delphine Dispa |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Interrater Reliability of Activity Questionnaires After an Intensive Motor-Skill Learning Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy / Julie Paradis
Titre : Interrater Reliability of Activity Questionnaires After an Intensive Motor-Skill Learning Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy Type de document : document électronique Auteurs : Julie Paradis ; Delphine Dispa ; Agnès de Montpellier ; Daniela Ebner-Karestinos ; Rodrigo Araneda ; Geoffroy Saussez ; Anne Renders ; Carlyne Arnould ; Yannick Bleyenheuft Année de publication : 2019 Note générale : Cet article est paru dans le revue Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation sous le https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.12.039 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Activities of daily living Cerebral palsy Neurological rehabilitation Psychometrics Questionnaire Rehabilitation Résumé : Objective
To investigate the reliability of parents-reported activity questionnaires after a motor-skill learning intervention for children with cerebral palsy (CP). We hypothesize that the intervention process might influence parental judgment.
Design
Double-blind randomized trial.
Setting
Conventional therapy was delivered in the usual context while intensive intervention was provided at the Catholic University of Louvain.
Participants
Children with CP (N=41; age range 5-18y, Gross Motor Function Classification System I-IV) were randomized to a control group (CG) (n=21, 2 dropouts) receiving conventional therapy or an intervention group (IG) (n=20) receiving hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy—including lower extremities (HABIT-ILE).
Interventions
Conventional therapy (mostly neurodevelopmental) was delivered as ongoing treatment (1-5 times/wk). HABIT-ILE, based on motor-skill learning, was delivered over 2 weeks. All children were assessed at T1 (baseline), T2 (3wk after baseline) and T3 (4mo after baseline).
Main Outcomes Measures
ABILHAND-Kids and ACTIVLIM-CP questionnaires rated by parents (perception) and 2 examiners (videotapes).
Results
Agreement (level/range) between examiners was systematically almost perfect (P≤.001). At baseline, moderate to almost perfect agreement (level/range) was observed between parents and examiners (P≤.001). At T2 and T3, a similar agreement (level/range) was observed for the CG. For the IG, a similar level of agreement was observed, but the range of agreement varied from poor to almost perfect (P≤.001), with parents estimating higher performance measures compared to examiners after intervention. Higher performance was associated with higher satisfaction scores of the child’s functional goals at T3.
Conclusion
Parents and examiners have a similar perception of the child’s performance at baseline and during conventional therapy. Their perceptions are less congruent after a motor-skill learning intervention, probably due to the goal-oriented process of the intervention. Therefore, our results favor the use of blind observations of home-videotaped items after intensive motor-skill learning interventions.En ligne : https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal:219712 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=98144 Interrater Reliability of Activity Questionnaires After an Intensive Motor-Skill Learning Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy [document électronique] / Julie Paradis ; Delphine Dispa ; Agnès de Montpellier ; Daniela Ebner-Karestinos ; Rodrigo Araneda ; Geoffroy Saussez ; Anne Renders ; Carlyne Arnould ; Yannick Bleyenheuft . - 2019.
Cet article est paru dans le revue Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation sous le https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.12.039
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Mots-clés : Activities of daily living Cerebral palsy Neurological rehabilitation Psychometrics Questionnaire Rehabilitation Résumé : Objective
To investigate the reliability of parents-reported activity questionnaires after a motor-skill learning intervention for children with cerebral palsy (CP). We hypothesize that the intervention process might influence parental judgment.
Design
Double-blind randomized trial.
Setting
Conventional therapy was delivered in the usual context while intensive intervention was provided at the Catholic University of Louvain.
Participants
Children with CP (N=41; age range 5-18y, Gross Motor Function Classification System I-IV) were randomized to a control group (CG) (n=21, 2 dropouts) receiving conventional therapy or an intervention group (IG) (n=20) receiving hand-arm bimanual intensive therapy—including lower extremities (HABIT-ILE).
Interventions
Conventional therapy (mostly neurodevelopmental) was delivered as ongoing treatment (1-5 times/wk). HABIT-ILE, based on motor-skill learning, was delivered over 2 weeks. All children were assessed at T1 (baseline), T2 (3wk after baseline) and T3 (4mo after baseline).
Main Outcomes Measures
ABILHAND-Kids and ACTIVLIM-CP questionnaires rated by parents (perception) and 2 examiners (videotapes).
Results
Agreement (level/range) between examiners was systematically almost perfect (P≤.001). At baseline, moderate to almost perfect agreement (level/range) was observed between parents and examiners (P≤.001). At T2 and T3, a similar agreement (level/range) was observed for the CG. For the IG, a similar level of agreement was observed, but the range of agreement varied from poor to almost perfect (P≤.001), with parents estimating higher performance measures compared to examiners after intervention. Higher performance was associated with higher satisfaction scores of the child’s functional goals at T3.
Conclusion
Parents and examiners have a similar perception of the child’s performance at baseline and during conventional therapy. Their perceptions are less congruent after a motor-skill learning intervention, probably due to the goal-oriented process of the intervention. Therefore, our results favor the use of blind observations of home-videotaped items after intensive motor-skill learning interventions.En ligne : https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal:219712 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=98144 Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire