Cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) in upper-limb prosthesis users / Helena Burger in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 168-173 Titre : Cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) in upper-limb prosthesis users Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Helena Burger ; Andrea Giordano ; Maja Mlakar ; Caterina Albensi ; Darinka Brezovar ; Franco Franchignoni Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 168-173 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.03.003 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Patient satisfaction  Upper extremity  Prosthesis  Outcome assessment  Questionnaire  Rehabilitation Résumé : Objective To validate the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) 8-item Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) questionnaire in upper-limb prosthesis users and to further verify measurement properties of this tool with Rasch analysis. Design Participants consisted of a convenience sample of 76 adults (54 men) using a prosthesis after unilateral upper-limb amputation who consecutively attended a follow-up visit at our centre. Methods After translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the CSD into the Slovene language, we evaluated functioning of the rating scale categories, item fit (internal construct validity), reliability indices and dimensionality, as well as convergent and discriminant construct validity of the questionnaire. Results Rasch analysis indicated that: (1) functioning of the 4 response options was acceptable; (2) all items fitted the measured construct [information-weighted (infit) and outlier-sensitive (outfit) mean-square statistics 0.60 to 1.40]; (3) person separation reliability was 0.62 (and Cronbach α = 0.76), item separation reliability was 0.83; (4) on principal component analysis (PCA) on the standardised residuals, the CSD showed borderline but acceptable unidimensionality and no local item dependency. Moreover, as expected, the CSD score showed good correlation with the QUEST 2.0 score (rs = 0.57) and little to fair correlation with the OPUS Upper Extremity Functional Status score (rs = 0.21). Conclusion The metric properties of the Slovene version of CSD agree with previous studies. The present study confirms the validity of CSD for measuring patient satisfaction with an upper-limb device, enhances the confidence in this tool for assessing upper-limb prosthesis users, and contributes to further refining the technical quality of this measure. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84115 [article] Cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) in upper-limb prosthesis users [texte imprimé] / Helena Burger ; Andrea Giordano ; Maja Mlakar ; Caterina Albensi ; Darinka Brezovar ; Franco Franchignoni . - 2019 . - p. 168-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.03.003 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 168-173 Mots-clés : Patient satisfaction  Upper extremity  Prosthesis  Outcome assessment  Questionnaire  Rehabilitation Résumé : Objective To validate the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) 8-item Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) questionnaire in upper-limb prosthesis users and to further verify measurement properties of this tool with Rasch analysis. Design Participants consisted of a convenience sample of 76 adults (54 men) using a prosthesis after unilateral upper-limb amputation who consecutively attended a follow-up visit at our centre. Methods After translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the CSD into the Slovene language, we evaluated functioning of the rating scale categories, item fit (internal construct validity), reliability indices and dimensionality, as well as convergent and discriminant construct validity of the questionnaire. Results Rasch analysis indicated that: (1) functioning of the 4 response options was acceptable; (2) all items fitted the measured construct [information-weighted (infit) and outlier-sensitive (outfit) mean-square statistics 0.60 to 1.40]; (3) person separation reliability was 0.62 (and Cronbach α = 0.76), item separation reliability was 0.83; (4) on principal component analysis (PCA) on the standardised residuals, the CSD showed borderline but acceptable unidimensionality and no local item dependency. Moreover, as expected, the CSD score showed good correlation with the QUEST 2.0 score (rs = 0.57) and little to fair correlation with the OPUS Upper Extremity Functional Status score (rs = 0.21). Conclusion The metric properties of the Slovene version of CSD agree with previous studies. The present study confirms the validity of CSD for measuring patient satisfaction with an upper-limb device, enhances the confidence in this tool for assessing upper-limb prosthesis users, and contributes to further refining the technical quality of this measure. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84115

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 in people with lower limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training / Franco Franchignoni in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 137-141 Titre : Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 in people with lower limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Franco Franchignoni ; Marco Traballesi ; Marco Monticone ; Andrea Giordano ; Stefano Brunelli ; Giorgio Ferriero Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 137-141 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.02.004 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Lower-limb amputation  Leg prosthesis  Outcome assessment  Psychometrics  Rehabilitation  Prosthetic training Résumé : Objective To determine the sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the self-administered Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 (LCI-5) in people with lower limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training. Design Prospective single-group observational study. Methods The LCI-5 was administered to 110 patients (69 males [63%]; median [interquartile range] age, 60 [48–69] years) before and after prosthetic training. The external anchor administered after the program was a 7-point Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS) designed to quantify the effect (improvement or deterioration) of the intervention. Results Test–retest reliability of the LCI-5 (n = 30) was high (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2,1] = 0.92). The minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level was 5.66 points. After triangulating these results with those of the mean-change approach and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the ROC curve ≥ 0.90), based on a different GRCS score splitting, we identified 2 cutoffs for the LCI-5: a change of 7 points, indicating the MCID, and 12 points, indicating “large improvement” in locomotor capabilities (12.5% and 21.4% of the maximum possible score, respectively). Conclusions The LCI-5 showed a high ability to detect change over time (responsiveness). The 2 proposed values (MCID of 7 points and large improvement of 12 points), based on a mix of distribution- and anchor-based approaches, represent cutoffs that can accurately identify 2 different levels of true change (as perceived by the patient) in locomotor capability after prosthetic training. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84110 [article] Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 in people with lower limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training [texte imprimé] / Franco Franchignoni ; Marco Traballesi ; Marco Monticone ; Andrea Giordano ; Stefano Brunelli ; Giorgio Ferriero . - 2019 . - p. 137-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.02.004 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 137-141 Mots-clés : Lower-limb amputation  Leg prosthesis  Outcome assessment  Psychometrics  Rehabilitation  Prosthetic training Résumé : Objective To determine the sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the self-administered Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 (LCI-5) in people with lower limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training. Design Prospective single-group observational study. Methods The LCI-5 was administered to 110 patients (69 males [63%]; median [interquartile range] age, 60 [48–69] years) before and after prosthetic training. The external anchor administered after the program was a 7-point Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS) designed to quantify the effect (improvement or deterioration) of the intervention. Results Test–retest reliability of the LCI-5 (n = 30) was high (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC2,1] = 0.92). The minimum detectable change at the 95% confidence level was 5.66 points. After triangulating these results with those of the mean-change approach and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the ROC curve ≥ 0.90), based on a different GRCS score splitting, we identified 2 cutoffs for the LCI-5: a change of 7 points, indicating the MCID, and 12 points, indicating “large improvement” in locomotor capabilities (12.5% and 21.4% of the maximum possible score, respectively). Conclusions The LCI-5 showed a high ability to detect change over time (responsiveness). The 2 proposed values (MCID of 7 points and large improvement of 12 points), based on a mix of distribution- and anchor-based approaches, represent cutoffs that can accurately identify 2 different levels of true change (as perceived by the patient) in locomotor capability after prosthetic training. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84110

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)