Method for the Systematic Reviews on Occupational Therapy and Driving and Community Mobility for Older Adults / Marian Arbesman in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 68/6 (novembre/décembre 2014)

Public ISBD [article]  inAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 68/6 (novembre/décembre 2014) . - p. 657-661 Titre : Method for the Systematic Reviews on Occupational Therapy and Driving and Community Mobility for Older Adults Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Marian Arbesman ; Deborah LIEBERMAN ; Debra R. BERLANSTEIN Année de publication : 2014 Article en page(s) : p. 657-661 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Personne âgée  Ergothérapie  Conduite automobile Résumé : Systematic reviews of literature relevant to driving and community mobility for older adults are important to the practice of occupational therapy. We describe the four questions that served as the focus for the systematic reviews of the effectiveness of occupational therapy assessments and interventions for driving and community mobility for older adults. We include the background for the reviews; the process followed for each question, including search terms and search strategy; the databases searched; and the methods used to summarize and critically appraise the literature. The final number of articles included in each systematic review, a summary of the themes of the results, the strengths and limitations of the findings, and the implications for practice, education, and research are presented. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=34407 [article] Method for the Systematic Reviews on Occupational Therapy and Driving and Community Mobility for Older Adults [texte imprimé] / Marian Arbesman ; Deborah LIEBERMAN ; Debra R. BERLANSTEIN . - 2014 . - p. 657-661. Langues : Anglais (eng) in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 68/6 (novembre/décembre 2014) . - p. 657-661 Mots-clés : Personne âgée  Ergothérapie  Conduite automobile Résumé : Systematic reviews of literature relevant to driving and community mobility for older adults are important to the practice of occupational therapy. We describe the four questions that served as the focus for the systematic reviews of the effectiveness of occupational therapy assessments and interventions for driving and community mobility for older adults. We include the background for the reviews; the process followed for each question, including search terms and search strategy; the databases searched; and the methods used to summarize and critically appraise the literature. The final number of articles included in each systematic review, a summary of the themes of the results, the strengths and limitations of the findings, and the implications for practice, education, and research are presented. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=34407

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Réserve	Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes Exclu du prêt

Method for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy and early intervention and early childhood services / Marian Arbesman in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 67/4 (juillet-aout 2013)

Public ISBD [article]  inAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 67/4 (juillet-aout 2013) . - p. 389-394 Titre : Method for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy and early intervention and early childhood services Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Marian Arbesman ; Deborah LIEBERMAN ; Debra R. BERLANSTEIN Année de publication : 2013 Article en page(s) : p. 389-394 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Médecine fondée sur les preuves  Enfant  Pédiatrie  Ergothérapie  Développement  Soins infirmiers Résumé : Systematic reviews of literature relevant to early intervention and early childhood services are important to the practice of occupational therapy. We describe the five questions that served as the focus for the systematic reviews of the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions in early intervention and early childhood services. We include the background for the reviews; the process followed for each question, including search terms and search strategy; the databases searched; and the methods used to summarize and critically appraise the literature. The final number of articles included in each systematic review; a summary of the themes of the results; the strengths and limitations of the findings; and implications for practice, education, and research are presented. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14142 [article] Method for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy and early intervention and early childhood services [texte imprimé] / Marian Arbesman ; Deborah LIEBERMAN ; Debra R. BERLANSTEIN . - 2013 . - p. 389-394. Langues : Anglais (eng) in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 67/4 (juillet-aout 2013) . - p. 389-394 Mots-clés : Médecine fondée sur les preuves  Enfant  Pédiatrie  Ergothérapie  Développement  Soins infirmiers Résumé : Systematic reviews of literature relevant to early intervention and early childhood services are important to the practice of occupational therapy. We describe the five questions that served as the focus for the systematic reviews of the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions in early intervention and early childhood services. We include the background for the reviews; the process followed for each question, including search terms and search strategy; the databases searched; and the methods used to summarize and critically appraise the literature. The final number of articles included in each systematic review; a summary of the themes of the results; the strengths and limitations of the findings; and implications for practice, education, and research are presented. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14142

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Réserve	Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes Exclu du prêt

Method for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy and neurodegenerative diseases / Marian Arbesman in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 68/1 (janvier-février 2014)

Public ISBD [article]  inAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 68/1 (janvier-février 2014) . - p.15-19 Titre : Method for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy and neurodegenerative diseases Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Marian Arbesman ; Deborah LIEBERMAN ; Debra R. BERLANSTEIN Année de publication : 2014 Article en page(s) : p.15-19 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Ergothérapie  Maladie dégénérative  Sclérose plaque  Revue de littérature Résumé : Systematic reviews of the literature relevant to neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), are important to the practice of occupational therapy. We describe the four questions that served as the focus for systematic reviews of the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions for PD, MS, and ALS. We include the background for the reviews; the process followed for addressing each question, including search terms and search strategy; the databases searched; and the methods used to summarize and critically appraise the literature. The final number of articles included in each systematic review; a summary of the themes of the results; the strengths and limitations of the findings; and implications for practice, education, and research are presented. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=19441 [article] Method for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy and neurodegenerative diseases [texte imprimé] / Marian Arbesman ; Deborah LIEBERMAN ; Debra R. BERLANSTEIN . - 2014 . - p.15-19. Langues : Anglais (eng) in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 68/1 (janvier-février 2014) . - p.15-19 Mots-clés : Ergothérapie  Maladie dégénérative  Sclérose plaque  Revue de littérature Résumé : Systematic reviews of the literature relevant to neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), are important to the practice of occupational therapy. We describe the four questions that served as the focus for systematic reviews of the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions for PD, MS, and ALS. We include the background for the reviews; the process followed for addressing each question, including search terms and search strategy; the databases searched; and the methods used to summarize and critically appraise the literature. The final number of articles included in each systematic review; a summary of the themes of the results; the strengths and limitations of the findings; and implications for practice, education, and research are presented. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=19441

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Réserve	Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes Exclu du prêt

Methodology for the systematic reviews on occupation- and activity-based intervention related to productive aging / Marian Arbesman in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 66/3 (mai-juin 2012)

Public ISBD [article]  inAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 66/3 (mai-juin 2012) . - p. 271-276 Titre : Methodology for the systematic reviews on occupation- and activity-based intervention related to productive aging Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Marian Arbesman ; Deborah LIEBERMAN Année de publication : 2012 Article en page(s) : p. 271-276 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Recherche médicale  Vieillissement  Médecine fondée sur les preuves Résumé : Systematic reviews of the literature relevant to community-dwelling older adults are important to the practice of occupational therapy. We describe the four questions that served as the focus for the systematic reviews of the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions for older adults living in the community. This article includes the background for the reviews; the process followed for each question, including search terms and search strategy; the databases searched; and the methods used to summarize and critically appraise the literature. The final number of articles included in each systematic review; a summary of the results; the strengths and limitations of the findings; and implications for practice, education, and research are presented. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14143 [article] Methodology for the systematic reviews on occupation- and activity-based intervention related to productive aging [texte imprimé] / Marian Arbesman ; Deborah LIEBERMAN . - 2012 . - p. 271-276. Langues : Anglais (eng) in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 66/3 (mai-juin 2012) . - p. 271-276 Mots-clés : Recherche médicale  Vieillissement  Médecine fondée sur les preuves Résumé : Systematic reviews of the literature relevant to community-dwelling older adults are important to the practice of occupational therapy. We describe the four questions that served as the focus for the systematic reviews of the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions for older adults living in the community. This article includes the background for the reviews; the process followed for each question, including search terms and search strategy; the databases searched; and the methods used to summarize and critically appraise the literature. The final number of articles included in each systematic review; a summary of the results; the strengths and limitations of the findings; and implications for practice, education, and research are presented. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14143

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Réserve	Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes Exclu du prêt

Methodology for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy for adults with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias / Marian Arbesman in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 65/5 (septembre-octobre 2011)

Public ISBD [article]  inAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 65/5 (septembre-octobre 2011) . - p. 490-496 Titre : Methodology for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy for adults with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Marian Arbesman ; Deborah LIEBERMAN Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p. 490-496 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Ergothérapie  Méthodologie  Démence Alzheimer Résumé : Systematic reviews of literature relevant to adults with Alzheimer’s disease and their families are important to the practice of occupational therapy. We describe the seven questions that served as the focus for systematic reviews of the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions for adults with Alzheimer’s disease and their families. We include the background for the reviews; the process followed for each question, including search terms and search strategy; the databases searched; and the methods used to summarize and critically appraise the literature. The final number of articles included in each systematic review; a summary of the results; the strengths and limitations of the findings; and implications for practice, education, and research are presented for the six questions addressing interventions in the areas of occupation, perception, environment, activity demands, fall prevention, and caregiver strategies. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14144 [article] Methodology for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy for adults with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias [texte imprimé] / Marian Arbesman ; Deborah LIEBERMAN . - 2011 . - p. 490-496. Langues : Anglais (eng) in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 65/5 (septembre-octobre 2011) . - p. 490-496 Mots-clés : Ergothérapie  Méthodologie  Démence Alzheimer Résumé : Systematic reviews of literature relevant to adults with Alzheimer’s disease and their families are important to the practice of occupational therapy. We describe the seven questions that served as the focus for systematic reviews of the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions for adults with Alzheimer’s disease and their families. We include the background for the reviews; the process followed for each question, including search terms and search strategy; the databases searched; and the methods used to summarize and critically appraise the literature. The final number of articles included in each systematic review; a summary of the results; the strengths and limitations of the findings; and implications for practice, education, and research are presented for the six questions addressing interventions in the areas of occupation, perception, environment, activity demands, fall prevention, and caregiver strategies. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14144

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Réserve	Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes Exclu du prêt

Methodology for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy for individuals with work-related injuries and illnesses / Marian Arbesman in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 65/1 (janvier-février 2011)

Permalink

Methodology for the systematic reviews on occupational therapy interventions for older adults with low vision / Marian Arbesman in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 67/3 (mai-juin 2013)

Permalink

Occupational Therapy Interventions for Adults With Multiple Sclerosis / Katharine PREISSNER in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 70/3 (mai - juin 2016)

Permalink

Occupational Therapy Interventions for People With Alzheimer's Disease. / Catherine Verrier Piersol in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 72/1 (January/February 2018)

Permalink

Using Evidence to Promote the Distinct Value of Occupational Therapy / Marian Arbesman in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 68/4 (juillet - août 2014)

Permalink

---

1 (1 - 10 / 10)