Assessment Frameworks : A Critical Reflection / Beth R. Crisp in The british journal of social work, 6, vol. 37 (sept. 2007)

Public ISBD [article]  inThe british journal of social work > 6, vol. 37 (sept. 2007) . - pp. 1059-1077 Titre : Assessment Frameworks : A Critical Reflection Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Beth R. Crisp, Auteur ; Mark R. Anderson, Auteur ; Joan Orme, Auteur Editeur : Oxford : Oxford university press - GB - Oxford Année de publication : 2007 Article en page(s) : pp. 1059-1077 Langues : Anglo-saxon (ang) Catégories : Cardijn Evaluation # Pratique professionnelle # Pratique sociale # Travail social Mots-clés : Evaluation  Pratique sociale  Pratique professionnelle  Travail social Résumé : "Increasing widespread requirements that assessment practice conforms to generic guidelines contained in assessment frameworks has been contentious and critiques offered on individual frameworks have been assumed to apply to the concept of assessment frameworks more generally. After comparing four assessment frameworks currently being used in the UK, this paper argues that although some generalizations can be made, for the most part, they are highly individual documents in terms of range and depth of content, the extent to which they are evidenced and the quality of that evidence and implicit expectations as to the skill bases of assessors. Furthermore, the introduction of assessment frameworks is not in itself a panacea to ensure good practice. Even with the most comprehensive frameworks, social workers will still need comprehensive training in assessment and supervision of their practice." Permalink : http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=12825 [article] Assessment Frameworks : A Critical Reflection [texte imprimé] / Beth R. Crisp, Auteur ; Mark R. Anderson, Auteur ; Joan Orme, Auteur . - Oxford : Oxford university press - GB - Oxford, 2007 . - pp. 1059-1077. Langues : Anglo-saxon (ang) in The british journal of social work > 6, vol. 37 (sept. 2007) . - pp. 1059-1077 Catégories : Cardijn Evaluation # Pratique professionnelle # Pratique sociale # Travail social Mots-clés : Evaluation  Pratique sociale  Pratique professionnelle  Travail social Résumé : "Increasing widespread requirements that assessment practice conforms to generic guidelines contained in assessment frameworks has been contentious and critiques offered on individual frameworks have been assumed to apply to the concept of assessment frameworks more generally. After comparing four assessment frameworks currently being used in the UK, this paper argues that although some generalizations can be made, for the most part, they are highly individual documents in terms of range and depth of content, the extent to which they are evidenced and the quality of that evidence and implicit expectations as to the skill bases of assessors. Furthermore, the introduction of assessment frameworks is not in itself a panacea to ensure good practice. Even with the most comprehensive frameworks, social workers will still need comprehensive training in assessment and supervision of their practice." Permalink : http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=12825

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
PER BJS 37/6 (2007)	Périodique	Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn LLN	Réserve Périodiques	Disponible

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1)