Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Attention, votre centre de documentation sera fermé ce vendredi 17 mai.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Attention, votre centre de documentation sera fermé ce vendredi 17 mai.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Résultat de la recherche
1 résultat(s) recherche sur le mot-clé 'Unilateral neglect,Rehabilitation,Stroke'
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Rehabilitation of unilateral neglect: Evidence-based medicine / Philippe Azouvi in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 60, n° 3 (June 2017)
[article]
Titre : Rehabilitation of unilateral neglect: Evidence-based medicine Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Philippe Azouvi, Auteur ; Jacques Luauté, Auteur ; Sophie Jacquin-Courtois, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : p. 191-197 Langues : Anglais (eng) Français (fre) Mots-clés : Rééducation fonctionnelle Accident cérébrovasculaire Médecine fondée sur les preuves Unilateral neglect,Rehabilitation,Stroke Résumé : Background: In the last decades, several rehabilitation methods have been developed to improve spatial neglect. These can be classified according to their theoretical basis: (i) enhance awareness of neglect behaviour through a top-down mechanism; (ii) low-level bottom-up sensory stimulation; (iii) modulation of inhibitory processes; (iv) increase arousal.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of the evidence on the effectiveness of rehabilitation procedures for unilateral neglect.
Method: A systematic search was performed to look for all randomised controlled trials aimed at reducing left spatial neglect that included a functional assessment. In addition, recent review papers and meta-analyses were analysed.
Results: Thirty-seven randomized controlled trials were found (12 bottom-up; 12 top-down; 1 interhemispheric competition; 12 combination of approaches) that included 1027 patients with neglect. Although there are some encouraging results, overall, the level of evidence remains low. Poor methodological quality and small sample sizes are major limitations in many published trials.
Conclusion: There is a need for well-conducted, large-scale randomised controlled trials that incorporate blinded assessments, evaluation of the generalization to activities of daily living and long-term follow-up.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=51688
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 60, n° 3 (June 2017) . - p. 191-197[article] Rehabilitation of unilateral neglect: Evidence-based medicine [texte imprimé] / Philippe Azouvi, Auteur ; Jacques Luauté, Auteur ; Sophie Jacquin-Courtois, Auteur . - 2017 . - p. 191-197.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Français (fre)
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 60, n° 3 (June 2017) . - p. 191-197
Mots-clés : Rééducation fonctionnelle Accident cérébrovasculaire Médecine fondée sur les preuves Unilateral neglect,Rehabilitation,Stroke Résumé : Background: In the last decades, several rehabilitation methods have been developed to improve spatial neglect. These can be classified according to their theoretical basis: (i) enhance awareness of neglect behaviour through a top-down mechanism; (ii) low-level bottom-up sensory stimulation; (iii) modulation of inhibitory processes; (iv) increase arousal.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of the evidence on the effectiveness of rehabilitation procedures for unilateral neglect.
Method: A systematic search was performed to look for all randomised controlled trials aimed at reducing left spatial neglect that included a functional assessment. In addition, recent review papers and meta-analyses were analysed.
Results: Thirty-seven randomized controlled trials were found (12 bottom-up; 12 top-down; 1 interhemispheric competition; 12 combination of approaches) that included 1027 patients with neglect. Although there are some encouraging results, overall, the level of evidence remains low. Poor methodological quality and small sample sizes are major limitations in many published trials.
Conclusion: There is a need for well-conducted, large-scale randomised controlled trials that incorporate blinded assessments, evaluation of the generalization to activities of daily living and long-term follow-up.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=51688 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt