Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Attention, votre centre de documentation sera fermé du 27/04 au 12/05 inclus.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Attention, votre centre de documentation sera fermé du 27/04 au 12/05 inclus.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Résultat de la recherche
2 résultat(s) recherche sur le mot-clé 'Psychometric properties'
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey in people with serious mental illness / Gemma Prat in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 82 Issue 12 (Décembre 2019)
[article]
Titre : Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey in people with serious mental illness Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Gemma Prat ; Arantxa Ribot ; Silvia Recorder ; Francisco Munoz Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 743-749 Note générale : doi.org/10.1177/0308022619856557 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey (EMAS) psychometric properties people with serious mental illness (PSMI) community adjustment social functioning occupational therapy Résumé : Introduction
Facilitating engagement in meaningful activities is a key intervention in the recovery process of people with serious mental illness. This study validates the use of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey in the Spanish mental health population for the purposes of measuring such engagement.
Method
Two hundred and ninety-five people with serious mental illness (68.3% were male; M = 47.5, SD = 9.7 years) participated voluntarily and anonymously in the study. All gave written informed consent. A translation into Spanish and back-translation to English was made. Reliability and validity of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey was assessed by the internal consistency, temporal stability and dimensionality of the scale.
Results
The Cronbach’s alpha of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey scale was 0.91 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.76. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure of the scale (χ2 = 93.906, p < .001; comparative fit index = .96, Tucker–Lewis index = .95, root-mean-square error of approximation (90% confidence interval) = .05 (.03–.07) and standardized root mean square residual = .04). All the items showed significant standardized factor loadings above .59. Correlation between the two factors was .97 (p < .001).
Conclusion
The instrument could be useful for assessing engagement in meaningful activities and helpful for recovery process interventions focused on enhancing community adjustment in people with serious mental illness.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=85670
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 82 Issue 12 (Décembre 2019) . - p. 743-749[article] Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey in people with serious mental illness [texte imprimé] / Gemma Prat ; Arantxa Ribot ; Silvia Recorder ; Francisco Munoz . - 2019 . - p. 743-749.
doi.org/10.1177/0308022619856557
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 82 Issue 12 (Décembre 2019) . - p. 743-749
Mots-clés : Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey (EMAS) psychometric properties people with serious mental illness (PSMI) community adjustment social functioning occupational therapy Résumé : Introduction
Facilitating engagement in meaningful activities is a key intervention in the recovery process of people with serious mental illness. This study validates the use of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey in the Spanish mental health population for the purposes of measuring such engagement.
Method
Two hundred and ninety-five people with serious mental illness (68.3% were male; M = 47.5, SD = 9.7 years) participated voluntarily and anonymously in the study. All gave written informed consent. A translation into Spanish and back-translation to English was made. Reliability and validity of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey was assessed by the internal consistency, temporal stability and dimensionality of the scale.
Results
The Cronbach’s alpha of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey scale was 0.91 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.76. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a two-factor structure of the scale (χ2 = 93.906, p < .001; comparative fit index = .96, Tucker–Lewis index = .95, root-mean-square error of approximation (90% confidence interval) = .05 (.03–.07) and standardized root mean square residual = .04). All the items showed significant standardized factor loadings above .59. Correlation between the two factors was .97 (p < .001).
Conclusion
The instrument could be useful for assessing engagement in meaningful activities and helpful for recovery process interventions focused on enhancing community adjustment in people with serious mental illness.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=85670 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtUse and psychometric properties of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index in rehabilitation: A systematic review / Natacha Bourget in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 61, n°4 (Juillet 2018)
[article]
Titre : Use and psychometric properties of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index in rehabilitation: A systematic review Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Natacha Bourget ; Anne Deblock-Bellamy ; Andreanne K. Blanchette ; Sèbiyo Charles Batcho Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 262-269 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Participation measure Reintegration to Normal Living Index Psychometric properties Rehabilitation Résumé : Background
Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI) is a generic 11-item questionnaire-based instrument that measures the degree to which individuals achieve reintegration to normal social activities.
Objectives
This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the use of this questionnaire in rehabilitation (objective 1) and to analyze its psychometric properties (objective 2).
Methods
We searched the literature in 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science) for articles published in English or French between 1988 and 2017. Studies that used RNLI or investigated at least one of its psychometric properties were included and analyzed according to the PRISMA statement. Data extraction and critical methodological appraisal of the articles were independently performed by 2 authors.
Results
A total of 117 studies met the inclusion criteria for objective 1. Half of these studies were conducted in North America (50.4%), mainly with stroke patients. The RNLI was used according to 7 different response formats. The 0–10 visual analog scale and 3-point Likert scale were the most commonly used response formats. For objective 2, 10 studies had evaluated the psychometric properties of the RNLI. Their results suggested good test–retest reliability (intraclass coefficient: 0.83–0.87); good internal consistency (Cronbach α: 0.73–0.97); poor to good construct validity, with Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficients between the RNLI and scores for many other well-known questionnaires ranging from 0.25 to 0.77. Other types of psychometric properties (e.g., responsiveness) were poorly investigated.
Conclusion
Despite the increasing use of RNLI in clinical studies, some aspects of its psychometric properties are still poorly evaluated. In addition to the validity and reliability shown in different studies, further studies are needed to investigate other measurement properties such as responsiveness.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80608
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 61, n°4 (Juillet 2018) . - p. 262-269[article] Use and psychometric properties of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index in rehabilitation: A systematic review [texte imprimé] / Natacha Bourget ; Anne Deblock-Bellamy ; Andreanne K. Blanchette ; Sèbiyo Charles Batcho . - 2018 . - p. 262-269.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 61, n°4 (Juillet 2018) . - p. 262-269
Mots-clés : Participation measure Reintegration to Normal Living Index Psychometric properties Rehabilitation Résumé : Background
Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI) is a generic 11-item questionnaire-based instrument that measures the degree to which individuals achieve reintegration to normal social activities.
Objectives
This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the use of this questionnaire in rehabilitation (objective 1) and to analyze its psychometric properties (objective 2).
Methods
We searched the literature in 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science) for articles published in English or French between 1988 and 2017. Studies that used RNLI or investigated at least one of its psychometric properties were included and analyzed according to the PRISMA statement. Data extraction and critical methodological appraisal of the articles were independently performed by 2 authors.
Results
A total of 117 studies met the inclusion criteria for objective 1. Half of these studies were conducted in North America (50.4%), mainly with stroke patients. The RNLI was used according to 7 different response formats. The 0–10 visual analog scale and 3-point Likert scale were the most commonly used response formats. For objective 2, 10 studies had evaluated the psychometric properties of the RNLI. Their results suggested good test–retest reliability (intraclass coefficient: 0.83–0.87); good internal consistency (Cronbach α: 0.73–0.97); poor to good construct validity, with Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficients between the RNLI and scores for many other well-known questionnaires ranging from 0.25 to 0.77. Other types of psychometric properties (e.g., responsiveness) were poorly investigated.
Conclusion
Despite the increasing use of RNLI in clinical studies, some aspects of its psychometric properties are still poorly evaluated. In addition to the validity and reliability shown in different studies, further studies are needed to investigate other measurement properties such as responsiveness.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80608 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt