Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche

[article]
Titre : |
Approaches to study across four year-levels of undergraduate occupational therapy students: Similar or different? |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Ted Brown ; Yuki Murdolo |
Année de publication : |
2016 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 752-561 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
ergothérapie étudiant |
Résumé : |
Introduction
Past studies that have investigated approaches to study adopted by undergraduate students suggest that university learners enrolled in different year-levels in the same academic course may take up different approaches to study. No research to date has investigated how approaches to learning may differ among undergraduate occupational therapy students enrolled in their first, second, third or fourth year of tertiary level study.
The aim of the current study was to examine the similarities and differences in approaches to study among four year-levels of occupational therapy students at one Australian university.
Method
First-, second-, third- and fourth-year undergraduate occupational therapy students (N = 376; 92.8% response rate) completed the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students. A one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD were conducted to identify differences in approaches to study across the four year-level cohorts of students.
Results
Fourth-year students differed significantly from first-, second- and third-year students on the mean scores of the deep and strategic approaches to study (F(3,372) = 6.958, p = .01 and F(3,372) = 8.366, p = .001 respectively) and on a number of the associated Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students subscales. There was no statistically significant difference across the four student cohorts on the mean score of the surface study approach.
Conclusion
Findings from the current study highlighted the difficulties in facilitating a deep approach to study and the prevalence of a surface study approach among undergraduate occupational therapy students. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47329 |
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.79 Issue 12 (Décembre 2016) . - p. 752-561
[article] Approaches to study across four year-levels of undergraduate occupational therapy students: Similar or different? [texte imprimé] / Ted Brown ; Yuki Murdolo . - 2016 . - p. 752-561. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.79 Issue 12 (Décembre 2016) . - p. 752-561
Mots-clés : |
ergothérapie étudiant |
Résumé : |
Introduction
Past studies that have investigated approaches to study adopted by undergraduate students suggest that university learners enrolled in different year-levels in the same academic course may take up different approaches to study. No research to date has investigated how approaches to learning may differ among undergraduate occupational therapy students enrolled in their first, second, third or fourth year of tertiary level study.
The aim of the current study was to examine the similarities and differences in approaches to study among four year-levels of occupational therapy students at one Australian university.
Method
First-, second-, third- and fourth-year undergraduate occupational therapy students (N = 376; 92.8% response rate) completed the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students. A one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD were conducted to identify differences in approaches to study across the four year-level cohorts of students.
Results
Fourth-year students differed significantly from first-, second- and third-year students on the mean scores of the deep and strategic approaches to study (F(3,372) = 6.958, p = .01 and F(3,372) = 8.366, p = .001 respectively) and on a number of the associated Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students subscales. There was no statistically significant difference across the four student cohorts on the mean score of the surface study approach.
Conclusion
Findings from the current study highlighted the difficulties in facilitating a deep approach to study and the prevalence of a surface study approach among undergraduate occupational therapy students. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47329 |
|  |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |

[article]
Titre : |
Are clients' performances on the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale associated with their functional performance? A preliminary investigation |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Laura Joliffe, Auteur ; Ted Brown, Auteur ; Leesa Fielding, Auteur |
Année de publication : |
2015 |
Article en page(s) : |
p.16-23 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Cognition Function Assessment Dementia Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale Functional Independence Measure |
Résumé : |
Introduction The process of selecting the most appropriate cognitive assessments to use with clients presenting with symptoms of dementia is an important consideration. Are cognitive assessment results associated with the functional performance of clients presenting suspected cognitive decline? The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale was associated with the functional performance of clients with suspected dementia.
Method A within-subjects quantitative research design was employed whereby a sample of 30 participants suspected of having dementia were recruited from three acute care hospital sites in the Melbourne metropolitan region. The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale was used to assess participants' cognitive abilities, while the Functional Independence Measure was the functional scale used. Linear regression analyses were completed.
Results The six Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale items were found to be significantly linked with the Functional Independence Measure total score (adjusted R 2 = 0.298, p < 0.05), the Functional Independence Measure ‘cognition’ subscale score (adjusted R 2 = 0.349, p < 0.05) and the Functional Independence Measure ‘physical’ subscale score (adjusted R 2 = 0.244; p < 0.05).
Conclusion The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale appears to be associated with the functional performance of clients with suspected dementia. The findings provide an insight into the link between cognition and everyday functional performance. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=35920 |
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Volume 78 numéro 1 (Janvier 2015) . - p.16-23
[article] Are clients' performances on the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale associated with their functional performance? A preliminary investigation [texte imprimé] / Laura Joliffe, Auteur ; Ted Brown, Auteur ; Leesa Fielding, Auteur . - 2015 . - p.16-23. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Volume 78 numéro 1 (Janvier 2015) . - p.16-23
Mots-clés : |
Cognition Function Assessment Dementia Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale Functional Independence Measure |
Résumé : |
Introduction The process of selecting the most appropriate cognitive assessments to use with clients presenting with symptoms of dementia is an important consideration. Are cognitive assessment results associated with the functional performance of clients presenting suspected cognitive decline? The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale was associated with the functional performance of clients with suspected dementia.
Method A within-subjects quantitative research design was employed whereby a sample of 30 participants suspected of having dementia were recruited from three acute care hospital sites in the Melbourne metropolitan region. The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale was used to assess participants' cognitive abilities, while the Functional Independence Measure was the functional scale used. Linear regression analyses were completed.
Results The six Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale items were found to be significantly linked with the Functional Independence Measure total score (adjusted R 2 = 0.298, p < 0.05), the Functional Independence Measure ‘cognition’ subscale score (adjusted R 2 = 0.349, p < 0.05) and the Functional Independence Measure ‘physical’ subscale score (adjusted R 2 = 0.244; p < 0.05).
Conclusion The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale appears to be associated with the functional performance of clients with suspected dementia. The findings provide an insight into the link between cognition and everyday functional performance. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=35920 |
|  |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |

[article]
Titre : |
A comparison of bibliometric indicators in occupational therapy journals published in English |
Titre original : |
Comparaison des indicateurs bibliométriques provenant de revues en ergothérapie publiées en anglais |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Ted Brown ; Sharon A. Gutman |
Année de publication : |
2019 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 125-135 |
Note générale : |
doi.org/10.1177/0008417419831453 |
Langues : |
Français (fre) |
Mots-clés : |
Bibliométrie Classement des revues Facteur d’impact Mesure de l’influence d’une revue Scores de qualité |
Résumé : |
L’utilisation de la bibliométrie pour évaluer la qualité et l’impact des revues évaluées par les pairs a augmenté avec l’accès aux bases de données électroniques et au nombre de citations.
But.
Cette analyse comparait et mettait en contraste la gamme de mesures bibliométriques d’une publication disponibles pour les revues en ergothérapie publiées en anglais.
Méthodologie.
Des données bibliométriques ont été extraites pour 23 revues en ergothérapie publiées en anglais, y compris des données provenant du facteur d’impact sur deux ans et sur cinq ans du Journal Citation Reports (JCR), de l’indice d’immédiateté du JCR, de l’indicateur Eigenfactor, de l’indicateur Article Influence, du Scopus Source Normalized Impact per Paper, de l’indicateur SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) et de l’indicateur ResearchGate Journal Impact. Les indices H ont également été extraits.
Résultats.
L’American Journal of Occupational Therapy avaient les indicateurs bibliométriques les plus élevés. Les indicateurs du SJR incluaient un grand nombre de revues, alors que les mesures bibliométriques du JCR étaient plus restrictives quant au nombre de revues comprises dans l’étude.
Conséquences.
De multiples mesures bibliométriques devraient être utilisées pour mieux comprendre la performance des revues en ergothérapie. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84254 |
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 86(2) (Avril 2019) . - p. 125-135
[article] A comparison of bibliometric indicators in occupational therapy journals published in English = Comparaison des indicateurs bibliométriques provenant de revues en ergothérapie publiées en anglais [texte imprimé] / Ted Brown ; Sharon A. Gutman . - 2019 . - p. 125-135. doi.org/10.1177/0008417419831453 Langues : Français ( fre) in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 86(2) (Avril 2019) . - p. 125-135
Mots-clés : |
Bibliométrie Classement des revues Facteur d’impact Mesure de l’influence d’une revue Scores de qualité |
Résumé : |
L’utilisation de la bibliométrie pour évaluer la qualité et l’impact des revues évaluées par les pairs a augmenté avec l’accès aux bases de données électroniques et au nombre de citations.
But.
Cette analyse comparait et mettait en contraste la gamme de mesures bibliométriques d’une publication disponibles pour les revues en ergothérapie publiées en anglais.
Méthodologie.
Des données bibliométriques ont été extraites pour 23 revues en ergothérapie publiées en anglais, y compris des données provenant du facteur d’impact sur deux ans et sur cinq ans du Journal Citation Reports (JCR), de l’indice d’immédiateté du JCR, de l’indicateur Eigenfactor, de l’indicateur Article Influence, du Scopus Source Normalized Impact per Paper, de l’indicateur SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) et de l’indicateur ResearchGate Journal Impact. Les indices H ont également été extraits.
Résultats.
L’American Journal of Occupational Therapy avaient les indicateurs bibliométriques les plus élevés. Les indicateurs du SJR incluaient un grand nombre de revues, alors que les mesures bibliométriques du JCR étaient plus restrictives quant au nombre de revues comprises dans l’étude.
Conséquences.
De multiples mesures bibliométriques devraient être utilisées pour mieux comprendre la performance des revues en ergothérapie. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84254 |
|  |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |

Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |

[article]
Titre : |
Examining content validity and reliability of the assessment of children’s hand skills (ACHS): a preliminary study |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Chi-Wen CHIEN ; Ted Brown ; Rachael McDonald |
Année de publication : |
2010 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 756-767 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Activités vie quotidienne Motricité Pédiatrie |
Résumé : |
Objectives
We developed the Assessment of Children’s Hand Skills (ACHS) to evaluate hand skills using naturalistic observation and examined the assessment’s interrater and test--retest reliability.
Method
We developed the hand skill framework, performed expert review, and pilot tested the ACHS. The ACHS’s reliability was examined by recruiting 54 children (30 typically developing children and 24 children with disabilities).
Results
The test--retest reliability for the ACHS was satisfactory at the individual item level (0.42 < or equal to k < or equal to 0.79) and the total scale level (Spearman’s r 5 0.78, p < .01). Moderate interrater agreement of the total scale scores was demonstrated (r 5 0.63, p < .01), but individual items exhibited varied interrater agreement.
Conclusion
The ACHS demonstrated adequate content validity and preliminary reliability evidence and could be used to quantify children’s hand skill use. Construct validity should be established in a clinical setting. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14100 |
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 64/5 (septembre-octobre 2010) . - p. 756-767
[article] Examining content validity and reliability of the assessment of children’s hand skills (ACHS): a preliminary study [texte imprimé] / Chi-Wen CHIEN ; Ted Brown ; Rachael McDonald . - 2010 . - p. 756-767. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 64/5 (septembre-octobre 2010) . - p. 756-767
Mots-clés : |
Activités vie quotidienne Motricité Pédiatrie |
Résumé : |
Objectives
We developed the Assessment of Children’s Hand Skills (ACHS) to evaluate hand skills using naturalistic observation and examined the assessment’s interrater and test--retest reliability.
Method
We developed the hand skill framework, performed expert review, and pilot tested the ACHS. The ACHS’s reliability was examined by recruiting 54 children (30 typically developing children and 24 children with disabilities).
Results
The test--retest reliability for the ACHS was satisfactory at the individual item level (0.42 < or equal to k < or equal to 0.79) and the total scale level (Spearman’s r 5 0.78, p < .01). Moderate interrater agreement of the total scale scores was demonstrated (r 5 0.63, p < .01), but individual items exhibited varied interrater agreement.
Conclusion
The ACHS demonstrated adequate content validity and preliminary reliability evidence and could be used to quantify children’s hand skill use. Construct validity should be established in a clinical setting. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14100 |
|  |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Réserve | Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes Exclu du prêt |

Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink