Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Rachel Sherman |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Anxieties of Entitlement : Elite Common Sense about Merit and Moral Worth / Rachel Sherman in Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques [Périodique électronique], 1, vol. 51 (2020)
[article]
Titre : Anxieties of Entitlement : Elite Common Sense about Merit and Moral Worth Type de document : document électronique Auteurs : Rachel Sherman Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : p. 61-86 Note générale : Issu du dossier : "Nouvelles directions dans les recherches sur la distinction sociale" Langues : Français (fre) Mots-clés : Classes sociales Valeurs (philosophie) Reconnaissance sociale Résumé : "Despite the rise of the “moral economy” as a frame for analyzing increasing inequality, few scholars have explored the moral dimensions of elites’ experience and interpretations of their own privilege. Based on in-depth interviews with 50 affluent New York parents, this paper focuses on how they manage the peculiar concept of “entitlement”. In U.S. political culture, this concept links individuals’ dispositions and behaviors to whether they deserve resources, as studies of welfare recipients have established. I argue that a similar analysis is needed for elites. These privileged actors want to interpret themselves as legitimately deserving of (i.e., entitled to) their social advantages, which means not being “entitled” in a behavioral and dispositional sense. They cast legitimate entitlement as depending upon moral worth in three areas: hard work, reasonable consumption, and “giving back”. They also feel a strong obligation to raise children who share the se values. In invoking these criteria of worth, affluent respondents primarily attach themselves to the symbolically-worthy American middle class. The paper concludes with a discussion of how this relationship between dispositions and distributions justifies inequality." En ligne : https://journals.openedition.org/rsa/3878 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=97889
in Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques [Périodique électronique] > 1, vol. 51 (2020) . - p. 61-86[article] Anxieties of Entitlement : Elite Common Sense about Merit and Moral Worth [document électronique] / Rachel Sherman . - 2020 . - p. 61-86.
Issu du dossier : "Nouvelles directions dans les recherches sur la distinction sociale"
Langues : Français (fre)
in Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques [Périodique électronique] > 1, vol. 51 (2020) . - p. 61-86
Mots-clés : Classes sociales Valeurs (philosophie) Reconnaissance sociale Résumé : "Despite the rise of the “moral economy” as a frame for analyzing increasing inequality, few scholars have explored the moral dimensions of elites’ experience and interpretations of their own privilege. Based on in-depth interviews with 50 affluent New York parents, this paper focuses on how they manage the peculiar concept of “entitlement”. In U.S. political culture, this concept links individuals’ dispositions and behaviors to whether they deserve resources, as studies of welfare recipients have established. I argue that a similar analysis is needed for elites. These privileged actors want to interpret themselves as legitimately deserving of (i.e., entitled to) their social advantages, which means not being “entitled” in a behavioral and dispositional sense. They cast legitimate entitlement as depending upon moral worth in three areas: hard work, reasonable consumption, and “giving back”. They also feel a strong obligation to raise children who share the se values. In invoking these criteria of worth, affluent respondents primarily attach themselves to the symbolically-worthy American middle class. The paper concludes with a discussion of how this relationship between dispositions and distributions justifies inequality." En ligne : https://journals.openedition.org/rsa/3878 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=97889 Exemplaires
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire