Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
[article]
| Titre : |
Cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) in upper-limb prosthesis users |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Helena Burger ; Andrea Giordano ; Maja Mlakar ; Caterina Albensi ; Darinka Brezovar ; Franco Franchignoni |
| Année de publication : |
2019 |
| Article en page(s) : |
p. 168-173 |
| Note générale : |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.03.003 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Mots-clés : |
Patient satisfaction Upper extremity Prosthesis Outcome assessment Questionnaire Rehabilitation |
| Résumé : |
Objective
To validate the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) 8-item Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) questionnaire in upper-limb prosthesis users and to further verify measurement properties of this tool with Rasch analysis.
Design
Participants consisted of a convenience sample of 76 adults (54 men) using a prosthesis after unilateral upper-limb amputation who consecutively attended a follow-up visit at our centre.
Methods
After translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the CSD into the Slovene language, we evaluated functioning of the rating scale categories, item fit (internal construct validity), reliability indices and dimensionality, as well as convergent and discriminant construct validity of the questionnaire.
Results
Rasch analysis indicated that: (1) functioning of the 4 response options was acceptable; (2) all items fitted the measured construct [information-weighted (infit) and outlier-sensitive (outfit) mean-square statistics 0.60 to 1.40]; (3) person separation reliability was 0.62 (and Cronbach α = 0.76), item separation reliability was 0.83; (4) on principal component analysis (PCA) on the standardised residuals, the CSD showed borderline but acceptable unidimensionality and no local item dependency. Moreover, as expected, the CSD score showed good correlation with the QUEST 2.0 score (rs = 0.57) and little to fair correlation with the OPUS Upper Extremity Functional Status score (rs = 0.21).
Conclusion
The metric properties of the Slovene version of CSD agree with previous studies. The present study confirms the validity of CSD for measuring patient satisfaction with an upper-limb device, enhances the confidence in this tool for assessing upper-limb prosthesis users, and contributes to further refining the technical quality of this measure. |
| Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84115 |
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 168-173
[article] Cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch validation of the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) in upper-limb prosthesis users [texte imprimé] / Helena Burger ; Andrea Giordano ; Maja Mlakar ; Caterina Albensi ; Darinka Brezovar ; Franco Franchignoni . - 2019 . - p. 168-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.03.003 Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 168-173
| Mots-clés : |
Patient satisfaction Upper extremity Prosthesis Outcome assessment Questionnaire Rehabilitation |
| Résumé : |
Objective
To validate the Slovene version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) 8-item Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) questionnaire in upper-limb prosthesis users and to further verify measurement properties of this tool with Rasch analysis.
Design
Participants consisted of a convenience sample of 76 adults (54 men) using a prosthesis after unilateral upper-limb amputation who consecutively attended a follow-up visit at our centre.
Methods
After translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the CSD into the Slovene language, we evaluated functioning of the rating scale categories, item fit (internal construct validity), reliability indices and dimensionality, as well as convergent and discriminant construct validity of the questionnaire.
Results
Rasch analysis indicated that: (1) functioning of the 4 response options was acceptable; (2) all items fitted the measured construct [information-weighted (infit) and outlier-sensitive (outfit) mean-square statistics 0.60 to 1.40]; (3) person separation reliability was 0.62 (and Cronbach α = 0.76), item separation reliability was 0.83; (4) on principal component analysis (PCA) on the standardised residuals, the CSD showed borderline but acceptable unidimensionality and no local item dependency. Moreover, as expected, the CSD score showed good correlation with the QUEST 2.0 score (rs = 0.57) and little to fair correlation with the OPUS Upper Extremity Functional Status score (rs = 0.21).
Conclusion
The metric properties of the Slovene version of CSD agree with previous studies. The present study confirms the validity of CSD for measuring patient satisfaction with an upper-limb device, enhances the confidence in this tool for assessing upper-limb prosthesis users, and contributes to further refining the technical quality of this measure. |
| Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84115 |
|  |
Exemplaires (1)
|
| Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt |
Exemplaires (1)
|
| Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt |
