Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Susan E. Toth-Cohen |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Beyond research literature: Occupational therapists’ perspectives on and uses of “evidence” in everyday practice / Deborah A. Dougherty in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83(5) (Décembre 2016)
[article]
Titre : Beyond research literature: Occupational therapists’ perspectives on and uses of “evidence” in everyday practice Titre original : Au-delà de la littérature scientifique : Les perspectives des ergothérapeutes sur les « faits probants » et leur usage dans la pratique quotidienne Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Deborah A. Dougherty ; Susan E. Toth-Cohen ; George Tomlin Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : p. 288-296 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : ergothérapie pratique centrée sur le client pratique fondée sur les faits probants raisonnement clinique recherche qualitative Résumé : Background.
Recent literature in evidence-based practice indicates that evidence is defined differently from practice and research perspectives. However, few published works address therapists’ perspectives of the nature and use of evidence in everyday practice.
Purpose.
This study describes the definition, types, and use of evidence from the perspective of six school-based occupational therapists.
Method.
Data were collected through focus groups and participant-submitted documentation and analyzed using qualitative and quantitative content analysis.
Findings.
Two categories of evidence emerged: internalized evidence and evidence gathered during the intervention process. Clinical reasoning, identified as a key skill in evidence-based practice, supported the synthesis of therapist internalized evidence with “in-the-moment” evidence gathered from activity, contextual, and occupational analyses of the client.
Implications.
The findings support current literature that has suggested expanding the definition of evidence (i.e., more than research findings alone). Further investigation of evidence building in practice may help in constructing a more inclusive professional culture of evidence-based practice.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47798
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(5) (Décembre 2016) . - p. 288-296[article] Beyond research literature: Occupational therapists’ perspectives on and uses of “evidence” in everyday practice = Au-delà de la littérature scientifique : Les perspectives des ergothérapeutes sur les « faits probants » et leur usage dans la pratique quotidienne [texte imprimé] / Deborah A. Dougherty ; Susan E. Toth-Cohen ; George Tomlin . - 2016 . - p. 288-296.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(5) (Décembre 2016) . - p. 288-296
Mots-clés : ergothérapie pratique centrée sur le client pratique fondée sur les faits probants raisonnement clinique recherche qualitative Résumé : Background.
Recent literature in evidence-based practice indicates that evidence is defined differently from practice and research perspectives. However, few published works address therapists’ perspectives of the nature and use of evidence in everyday practice.
Purpose.
This study describes the definition, types, and use of evidence from the perspective of six school-based occupational therapists.
Method.
Data were collected through focus groups and participant-submitted documentation and analyzed using qualitative and quantitative content analysis.
Findings.
Two categories of evidence emerged: internalized evidence and evidence gathered during the intervention process. Clinical reasoning, identified as a key skill in evidence-based practice, supported the synthesis of therapist internalized evidence with “in-the-moment” evidence gathered from activity, contextual, and occupational analyses of the client.
Implications.
The findings support current literature that has suggested expanding the definition of evidence (i.e., more than research findings alone). Further investigation of evidence building in practice may help in constructing a more inclusive professional culture of evidence-based practice.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47798 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt