Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Attention,
Votre centre de documentation sera fermé ce lundi 26 août.
Également, ce mercredi 28 août il sera fermé de 12 à 13h.
Enfin, ce jeudi 29 août il ouvrira à 14h45.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Diane E. MacKenzie
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
![détail détail](./getgif.php?nomgif=plus)
[article]
Titre : |
Face validity of the youth Multiple Errands Test (yMET) in the community: A focus group and pilot study |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Vanessa L. Hanberg ; Diane E. MacKenzie ; Joan Versnel |
Année de publication : |
2019 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 248-258 |
Note générale : |
doi.org/10.1177/0308022618813098 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Executive function, adolescent young adult multiple errands test face validity occupational therapy |
Résumé : |
Introduction
During late adolescence and early adulthood, maturation of cognitive functions including executive functions are occurring. The multiple errands test is an assessment of real-world executive functions and, to date, non-virtual reality multiple errands test research has focused primarily on adults with acquired brain injury in hospital settings. There is poor evidence across multiple errands test studies for content and face validity and limited studies in the community. This study aimed to explore multiple errands test face validity for typically developing youth (age 16–24 years) and describe their community setting performance on a youth multiple errands test.
Methods
A youth focus group (N = 5) was conducted to explore perceptions of the multiple errands test. From their input, the youth multiple errands test was developed and pilot tested (N = 9) in a shopping mall.
Results
Two themes emerged from focus group analysis and limited changes, relevant to youth, were made to develop the youth multiple errands test. The focus group and pilot study found the youth multiple errands test was acceptable and cognitively challenging for youth, with older youth performing better than younger youth. Overall youth multiple errands test performance suggests similarities to healthy adults in previous studies.
Conclusion
Findings must be interpreted with caution since the sample was small, but preliminary results indicate that future studies with the youth multiple errands test are feasible and warranted. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80410 |
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 85 Issue 4 (Avril 2019) . - p. 248-258
[article] Face validity of the youth Multiple Errands Test (yMET) in the community: A focus group and pilot study [texte imprimé] / Vanessa L. Hanberg ; Diane E. MacKenzie ; Joan Versnel . - 2019 . - p. 248-258. doi.org/10.1177/0308022618813098 Langues : Anglais ( eng) in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 85 Issue 4 (Avril 2019) . - p. 248-258
Mots-clés : |
Executive function, adolescent young adult multiple errands test face validity occupational therapy |
Résumé : |
Introduction
During late adolescence and early adulthood, maturation of cognitive functions including executive functions are occurring. The multiple errands test is an assessment of real-world executive functions and, to date, non-virtual reality multiple errands test research has focused primarily on adults with acquired brain injury in hospital settings. There is poor evidence across multiple errands test studies for content and face validity and limited studies in the community. This study aimed to explore multiple errands test face validity for typically developing youth (age 16–24 years) and describe their community setting performance on a youth multiple errands test.
Methods
A youth focus group (N = 5) was conducted to explore perceptions of the multiple errands test. From their input, the youth multiple errands test was developed and pilot tested (N = 9) in a shopping mall.
Results
Two themes emerged from focus group analysis and limited changes, relevant to youth, were made to develop the youth multiple errands test. The focus group and pilot study found the youth multiple errands test was acceptable and cognitively challenging for youth, with older youth performing better than younger youth. Overall youth multiple errands test performance suggests similarities to healthy adults in previous studies.
Conclusion
Findings must be interpreted with caution since the sample was small, but preliminary results indicate that future studies with the youth multiple errands test are feasible and warranted. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80410 |
| ![Face validity of the youth Multiple Errands Test (yMET) in the community: A focus group and pilot study vignette](./images/vide.png) |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |
![détail détail](./getgif.php?nomgif=plus)
[article]
Titre : |
Investigating visual attention during scene perception of safe and unsafe occupational performance |
Titre original : |
L’analyse de l’attention visuelle durant une scène permettant de percevoir un rendement occupationnel sécuritaire ou non sécuritaire |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Diane E. MacKenzie, Auteur ; David A. Westwood, Auteur |
Année de publication : |
2015 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 224-234 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Activities of Daily Living Attention Eye movement Occupational therapy Visual perception |
Résumé : |
Background. Occupational therapists routinely use observation for evaluation, intervention planning, and prediction of a client’s occupational performance and/or safety within the environment. Perception of safety contributes to the decision-making process for discharge or placement recommendations.
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine if differences exist in safety ratings and eye movements between occupational therapists and nontrained matched individuals while viewing domain-specific versus non-domain-specific images.
Method. Ten licensed occupational therapists and 10 age-, gender-, and education level–matched participants completed this eye-tracking study.
Findings. For all image exposure durations, occupational therapists had more polarized safety ratings for stroke-related image content but little evidence of differences in eye movements between groups. Eye movement group differences did not emerge in the regions of interest identified by an independent expert panel.
Implications. The results point to a complex relationship between decision making and observational behaviour in occupational assessment and highlight the need to look beyond image features. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=40887 |
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 82(4) (Octobre 2015) . - p. 224-234
[article] Investigating visual attention during scene perception of safe and unsafe occupational performance = L’analyse de l’attention visuelle durant une scène permettant de percevoir un rendement occupationnel sécuritaire ou non sécuritaire [texte imprimé] / Diane E. MacKenzie, Auteur ; David A. Westwood, Auteur . - 2015 . - p. 224-234. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 82(4) (Octobre 2015) . - p. 224-234
Mots-clés : |
Activities of Daily Living Attention Eye movement Occupational therapy Visual perception |
Résumé : |
Background. Occupational therapists routinely use observation for evaluation, intervention planning, and prediction of a client’s occupational performance and/or safety within the environment. Perception of safety contributes to the decision-making process for discharge or placement recommendations.
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to determine if differences exist in safety ratings and eye movements between occupational therapists and nontrained matched individuals while viewing domain-specific versus non-domain-specific images.
Method. Ten licensed occupational therapists and 10 age-, gender-, and education level–matched participants completed this eye-tracking study.
Findings. For all image exposure durations, occupational therapists had more polarized safety ratings for stroke-related image content but little evidence of differences in eye movements between groups. Eye movement group differences did not emerge in the regions of interest identified by an independent expert panel.
Implications. The results point to a complex relationship between decision making and observational behaviour in occupational assessment and highlight the need to look beyond image features. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=40887 |
| ![Investigating visual attention during scene perception of safe and unsafe occupational performance vignette](./images/vide.png) |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |
![détail détail](./getgif.php?nomgif=plus)
[article]
Titre : |
Scoping review of the Multiple Errands Test: Is it relevant to youths with acquired brain injury? |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Vanessa L. Hanberg ; Diane E. MacKenzie ; Brenda K. Merritt |
Année de publication : |
2018 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 673-686 |
Note générale : |
doi.org/10.1177/0308022618791714 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Occupational therapy executive function performance-based assessment brain injuries adolescent young adult youths |
Résumé : |
Introduction
For youths who sustain acquired brain injuries, distinguishing typical development of executive function from the impairment(s) can be a challenging but critical assessment consideration. Occupational therapists working with individuals after brain injury can use the Multiple Errands Test as a performance-based assessment of the effect of executive dysfunction in the real world. Although numerous test versions exist for different settings and diagnostic populations, their relevance to youths is unclear. We surveyed the non-virtual reality literature for test versions to determine the measurement properties and clinical utility for assessing youths in a community setting.
Method
A scoping review was completed to summarize study purpose/design, Multiple Errands Test structure, assessment environment, sample characteristics, psychometric properties, clinical utility and main findings of the test versions.
Results
We included 10 quantitative studies and found the strongest reliability and validity evidence for male adults with moderate to severe acquired brain injury, in a hospital setting. Multiple Errands Test versions can distinguish people with brain injury from controls and identify challenges in the home and community. No studies examined the test performance of younger participants.
Conclusion
This review highlights the research of several Multiple Errands Test versions and identifies gaps in that research, including the need for development of a test version for youths in a community setting. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80283 |
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 81 Issue 12 (Décembre 2018) . - p. 673-686
[article] Scoping review of the Multiple Errands Test: Is it relevant to youths with acquired brain injury? [texte imprimé] / Vanessa L. Hanberg ; Diane E. MacKenzie ; Brenda K. Merritt . - 2018 . - p. 673-686. doi.org/10.1177/0308022618791714 Langues : Anglais ( eng) in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 81 Issue 12 (Décembre 2018) . - p. 673-686
Mots-clés : |
Occupational therapy executive function performance-based assessment brain injuries adolescent young adult youths |
Résumé : |
Introduction
For youths who sustain acquired brain injuries, distinguishing typical development of executive function from the impairment(s) can be a challenging but critical assessment consideration. Occupational therapists working with individuals after brain injury can use the Multiple Errands Test as a performance-based assessment of the effect of executive dysfunction in the real world. Although numerous test versions exist for different settings and diagnostic populations, their relevance to youths is unclear. We surveyed the non-virtual reality literature for test versions to determine the measurement properties and clinical utility for assessing youths in a community setting.
Method
A scoping review was completed to summarize study purpose/design, Multiple Errands Test structure, assessment environment, sample characteristics, psychometric properties, clinical utility and main findings of the test versions.
Results
We included 10 quantitative studies and found the strongest reliability and validity evidence for male adults with moderate to severe acquired brain injury, in a hospital setting. Multiple Errands Test versions can distinguish people with brain injury from controls and identify challenges in the home and community. No studies examined the test performance of younger participants.
Conclusion
This review highlights the research of several Multiple Errands Test versions and identifies gaps in that research, including the need for development of a test version for youths in a community setting. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80283 |
| ![Scoping review of the Multiple Errands Test: Is it relevant to youths with acquired brain injury? vignette](./images/vide.png) |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |