Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Brenda K. Merritt |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Scoping review of the Multiple Errands Test: Is it relevant to youths with acquired brain injury? / Vanessa L. Hanberg in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 81 Issue 12 (Décembre 2018)
[article]
Titre : Scoping review of the Multiple Errands Test: Is it relevant to youths with acquired brain injury? Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Vanessa L. Hanberg ; Diane E. MacKenzie ; Brenda K. Merritt Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 673-686 Note générale : doi.org/10.1177/0308022618791714 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Occupational therapy executive function performance-based assessment brain injuries adolescent young adult youths Résumé : Introduction
For youths who sustain acquired brain injuries, distinguishing typical development of executive function from the impairment(s) can be a challenging but critical assessment consideration. Occupational therapists working with individuals after brain injury can use the Multiple Errands Test as a performance-based assessment of the effect of executive dysfunction in the real world. Although numerous test versions exist for different settings and diagnostic populations, their relevance to youths is unclear. We surveyed the non-virtual reality literature for test versions to determine the measurement properties and clinical utility for assessing youths in a community setting.
Method
A scoping review was completed to summarize study purpose/design, Multiple Errands Test structure, assessment environment, sample characteristics, psychometric properties, clinical utility and main findings of the test versions.
Results
We included 10 quantitative studies and found the strongest reliability and validity evidence for male adults with moderate to severe acquired brain injury, in a hospital setting. Multiple Errands Test versions can distinguish people with brain injury from controls and identify challenges in the home and community. No studies examined the test performance of younger participants.
Conclusion
This review highlights the research of several Multiple Errands Test versions and identifies gaps in that research, including the need for development of a test version for youths in a community setting.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80283
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 81 Issue 12 (Décembre 2018) . - p. 673-686[article] Scoping review of the Multiple Errands Test: Is it relevant to youths with acquired brain injury? [texte imprimé] / Vanessa L. Hanberg ; Diane E. MacKenzie ; Brenda K. Merritt . - 2018 . - p. 673-686.
doi.org/10.1177/0308022618791714
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 81 Issue 12 (Décembre 2018) . - p. 673-686
Mots-clés : Occupational therapy executive function performance-based assessment brain injuries adolescent young adult youths Résumé : Introduction
For youths who sustain acquired brain injuries, distinguishing typical development of executive function from the impairment(s) can be a challenging but critical assessment consideration. Occupational therapists working with individuals after brain injury can use the Multiple Errands Test as a performance-based assessment of the effect of executive dysfunction in the real world. Although numerous test versions exist for different settings and diagnostic populations, their relevance to youths is unclear. We surveyed the non-virtual reality literature for test versions to determine the measurement properties and clinical utility for assessing youths in a community setting.
Method
A scoping review was completed to summarize study purpose/design, Multiple Errands Test structure, assessment environment, sample characteristics, psychometric properties, clinical utility and main findings of the test versions.
Results
We included 10 quantitative studies and found the strongest reliability and validity evidence for male adults with moderate to severe acquired brain injury, in a hospital setting. Multiple Errands Test versions can distinguish people with brain injury from controls and identify challenges in the home and community. No studies examined the test performance of younger participants.
Conclusion
This review highlights the research of several Multiple Errands Test versions and identifies gaps in that research, including the need for development of a test version for youths in a community setting.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80283 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtValidity of using the assessment of motor and process skills to determine the need for assistance / Brenda K. Merritt in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 65/6 (novembre-décembre 2011)
[article]
Titre : Validity of using the assessment of motor and process skills to determine the need for assistance Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Brenda K. Merritt Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p. 643-650 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Activités vie quotidienne Evaluation Handicap Sensation Motricité Résumé : OBJECTIVE. This study evaluated the validity of using Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) measures as evidence of the need for assistance in the community.
METHOD. In a retrospective analysis of existing data (N = 64,466), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and a split-sample method was used to validate the predictions.
RESULTS. When identifying people who need assistance versus those who do not need assistance in the community, activity of daily living (ADL) motor and ADL process measures have fair and good discriminating value, respectively (areas under the ROC curves were .78 and .84). Evidence supports placing ADL motor and ADL process independence cutoff measures at 1.50 logits (sensitivity = .67, specificity = .72) and 1.00 logit (sensitivity = .81, specificity = .70), respectively. Accuracy was highest when matched motor and process decisions occurred (sensitivity = .85, specificity = .83).
CONCLUSION. Evidence supports using ADL ability measures from the AMPS to provide evidence of a client’s need for assistance in the community.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14264
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 65/6 (novembre-décembre 2011) . - p. 643-650[article] Validity of using the assessment of motor and process skills to determine the need for assistance [texte imprimé] / Brenda K. Merritt . - 2011 . - p. 643-650.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 65/6 (novembre-décembre 2011) . - p. 643-650
Mots-clés : Activités vie quotidienne Evaluation Handicap Sensation Motricité Résumé : OBJECTIVE. This study evaluated the validity of using Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) measures as evidence of the need for assistance in the community.
METHOD. In a retrospective analysis of existing data (N = 64,466), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and a split-sample method was used to validate the predictions.
RESULTS. When identifying people who need assistance versus those who do not need assistance in the community, activity of daily living (ADL) motor and ADL process measures have fair and good discriminating value, respectively (areas under the ROC curves were .78 and .84). Evidence supports placing ADL motor and ADL process independence cutoff measures at 1.50 logits (sensitivity = .67, specificity = .72) and 1.00 logit (sensitivity = .81, specificity = .70), respectively. Accuracy was highest when matched motor and process decisions occurred (sensitivity = .85, specificity = .83).
CONCLUSION. Evidence supports using ADL ability measures from the AMPS to provide evidence of a client’s need for assistance in the community.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14264 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Réserve Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes
Exclu du prêt