Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche

[article]
Titre : |
Scoping review of the Multiple Errands Test: Is it relevant to youths with acquired brain injury? |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Vanessa L. Hanberg ; Diane E. MacKenzie ; Brenda K. Merritt |
Année de publication : |
2018 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 673-686 |
Note générale : |
doi.org/10.1177/0308022618791714 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Occupational therapy executive function performance-based assessment brain injuries adolescent young adult youths |
Résumé : |
Introduction
For youths who sustain acquired brain injuries, distinguishing typical development of executive function from the impairment(s) can be a challenging but critical assessment consideration. Occupational therapists working with individuals after brain injury can use the Multiple Errands Test as a performance-based assessment of the effect of executive dysfunction in the real world. Although numerous test versions exist for different settings and diagnostic populations, their relevance to youths is unclear. We surveyed the non-virtual reality literature for test versions to determine the measurement properties and clinical utility for assessing youths in a community setting.
Method
A scoping review was completed to summarize study purpose/design, Multiple Errands Test structure, assessment environment, sample characteristics, psychometric properties, clinical utility and main findings of the test versions.
Results
We included 10 quantitative studies and found the strongest reliability and validity evidence for male adults with moderate to severe acquired brain injury, in a hospital setting. Multiple Errands Test versions can distinguish people with brain injury from controls and identify challenges in the home and community. No studies examined the test performance of younger participants.
Conclusion
This review highlights the research of several Multiple Errands Test versions and identifies gaps in that research, including the need for development of a test version for youths in a community setting. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80283 |
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 81 Issue 12 (Décembre 2018) . - p. 673-686
[article] Scoping review of the Multiple Errands Test: Is it relevant to youths with acquired brain injury? [texte imprimé] / Vanessa L. Hanberg ; Diane E. MacKenzie ; Brenda K. Merritt . - 2018 . - p. 673-686. doi.org/10.1177/0308022618791714 Langues : Anglais ( eng) in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 81 Issue 12 (Décembre 2018) . - p. 673-686
Mots-clés : |
Occupational therapy executive function performance-based assessment brain injuries adolescent young adult youths |
Résumé : |
Introduction
For youths who sustain acquired brain injuries, distinguishing typical development of executive function from the impairment(s) can be a challenging but critical assessment consideration. Occupational therapists working with individuals after brain injury can use the Multiple Errands Test as a performance-based assessment of the effect of executive dysfunction in the real world. Although numerous test versions exist for different settings and diagnostic populations, their relevance to youths is unclear. We surveyed the non-virtual reality literature for test versions to determine the measurement properties and clinical utility for assessing youths in a community setting.
Method
A scoping review was completed to summarize study purpose/design, Multiple Errands Test structure, assessment environment, sample characteristics, psychometric properties, clinical utility and main findings of the test versions.
Results
We included 10 quantitative studies and found the strongest reliability and validity evidence for male adults with moderate to severe acquired brain injury, in a hospital setting. Multiple Errands Test versions can distinguish people with brain injury from controls and identify challenges in the home and community. No studies examined the test performance of younger participants.
Conclusion
This review highlights the research of several Multiple Errands Test versions and identifies gaps in that research, including the need for development of a test version for youths in a community setting. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80283 |
|  |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |

[article]
Titre : |
Validity of using the assessment of motor and process skills to determine the need for assistance |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Brenda K. Merritt |
Année de publication : |
2011 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 643-650 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Activités vie quotidienne Evaluation Handicap Sensation Motricité |
Résumé : |
OBJECTIVE. This study evaluated the validity of using Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) measures as evidence of the need for assistance in the community.
METHOD. In a retrospective analysis of existing data (N = 64,466), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and a split-sample method was used to validate the predictions.
RESULTS. When identifying people who need assistance versus those who do not need assistance in the community, activity of daily living (ADL) motor and ADL process measures have fair and good discriminating value, respectively (areas under the ROC curves were .78 and .84). Evidence supports placing ADL motor and ADL process independence cutoff measures at 1.50 logits (sensitivity = .67, specificity = .72) and 1.00 logit (sensitivity = .81, specificity = .70), respectively. Accuracy was highest when matched motor and process decisions occurred (sensitivity = .85, specificity = .83).
CONCLUSION. Evidence supports using ADL ability measures from the AMPS to provide evidence of a client’s need for assistance in the community. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14264 |
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 65/6 (novembre-décembre 2011) . - p. 643-650
[article] Validity of using the assessment of motor and process skills to determine the need for assistance [texte imprimé] / Brenda K. Merritt . - 2011 . - p. 643-650. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 65/6 (novembre-décembre 2011) . - p. 643-650
Mots-clés : |
Activités vie quotidienne Evaluation Handicap Sensation Motricité |
Résumé : |
OBJECTIVE. This study evaluated the validity of using Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) measures as evidence of the need for assistance in the community.
METHOD. In a retrospective analysis of existing data (N = 64,466), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and a split-sample method was used to validate the predictions.
RESULTS. When identifying people who need assistance versus those who do not need assistance in the community, activity of daily living (ADL) motor and ADL process measures have fair and good discriminating value, respectively (areas under the ROC curves were .78 and .84). Evidence supports placing ADL motor and ADL process independence cutoff measures at 1.50 logits (sensitivity = .67, specificity = .72) and 1.00 logit (sensitivity = .81, specificity = .70), respectively. Accuracy was highest when matched motor and process decisions occurred (sensitivity = .85, specificity = .83).
CONCLUSION. Evidence supports using ADL ability measures from the AMPS to provide evidence of a client’s need for assistance in the community. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14264 |
|  |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Réserve | Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes Exclu du prêt |