Systematic reviews informing occupational therapy / Sally Bennett in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 67/3 (mai-juin 2013)

Public ISBD [article]  inAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 67/3 (mai-juin 2013) . - p. 345-354 Titre : Systematic reviews informing occupational therapy Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Sally Bennett ; Tammy HOFFMANN ; et al. ; Annie McCluskey Année de publication : 2013 Article en page(s) : p. 345-354 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Banque donnée  Revue de littérature  Médecine fondée sur les preuves  Ergothérapie Résumé : OBJECTIVE:We sought to identify and describe the number, topics, and publishing trends of systematic reviews relevant to occupational therapy indexed in the OTseeker database. METHOD:We performed a cross-sectional survey of the systematic reviews contained in OTseeker in December 2011. RESULTS:Of the 1,940 systematic reviews indexed in OTseeker, only 53 (2.7%) were published in occupational therapy journals. The most common diagnostic categories were stroke (n = 195, 10.1%) and affective disorders (n = 204, 10.5%). The most common intervention categories were consumer education (n = 644, 33.2%) and psychosocial techniques (n = 571, 29.4%). Only 390 (20.1%) of the 1,940 systematic reviews specifically involved occupational therapy. CONCLUSION:Occupational therapists need to search broadly to locate relevant systematic reviews or, alternatively, to use databases such as OTseeker. Clarity about the involvement of occupational therapy in reports of future research will improve the ability to identify occupational therapy research for all stakeholders. Finally, occupational therapy practitioners need to read systematic reviews critically to determine whether review conclusions are justified. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14245 [article] Systematic reviews informing occupational therapy [texte imprimé] / Sally Bennett ; Tammy HOFFMANN ; et al. ; Annie McCluskey . - 2013 . - p. 345-354. Langues : Anglais (eng) in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 67/3 (mai-juin 2013) . - p. 345-354 Mots-clés : Banque donnée  Revue de littérature  Médecine fondée sur les preuves  Ergothérapie Résumé : OBJECTIVE:We sought to identify and describe the number, topics, and publishing trends of systematic reviews relevant to occupational therapy indexed in the OTseeker database. METHOD:We performed a cross-sectional survey of the systematic reviews contained in OTseeker in December 2011. RESULTS:Of the 1,940 systematic reviews indexed in OTseeker, only 53 (2.7%) were published in occupational therapy journals. The most common diagnostic categories were stroke (n = 195, 10.1%) and affective disorders (n = 204, 10.5%). The most common intervention categories were consumer education (n = 644, 33.2%) and psychosocial techniques (n = 571, 29.4%). Only 390 (20.1%) of the 1,940 systematic reviews specifically involved occupational therapy. CONCLUSION:Occupational therapists need to search broadly to locate relevant systematic reviews or, alternatively, to use databases such as OTseeker. Clarity about the involvement of occupational therapy in reports of future research will improve the ability to identify occupational therapy research for all stakeholders. Finally, occupational therapy practitioners need to read systematic reviews critically to determine whether review conclusions are justified. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14245

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Réserve	Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes Exclu du prêt

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1)