Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Mention de date : Octobre 2016
Paru le : 01/10/2016
|
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |
Dépouillements
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier
[article]
Titre : |
Préciser les différences et explorer les possibilités de collaboration entre la RCE et les Actualités ergothérapiques |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Janna MacLachlan ; Jane A. Davis |
Année de publication : |
2016 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 202-203 |
Langues : |
Français (fre) |
Résumé : |
L’Association canadienne des ergothérapeutes (ACE) dispose de deux plateformes pour publier des articles, soient la Revue canadienne d’ergothérapie (RCE)—une revue examinée par les pairs—et les Actualités ergothérapiques—un périodique axé sur la pratique. Ces deux publications offrent aux membres de l’ACE et aux lecteurs du monde entier des articles de pointe traitant de la portée actuelle de la pratique de l’ergothérapie, de même que du développement de nouvelles possibilités en matière de pratique, dans le contexte canadien. Au cours des dernières années, les comités de rédaction de la RCE et des Actualités ergothérapiques ont discuté de différentes façons de créer des possibilités de collaboration, en vue d’optimiser les occasions offertes par la portée et la nature de la production de chacune des publications. Comme les deux publications évoluent constamment afin de répondre aux milieux dynamiques de la pratique et du processus de publication, cet éditorial vise à décrire la portée de chaque publication, leurs similarités et leurs différences, de même que les possibilités de collaboration en vue de promouvoir la pratique fondée sur les faits et basée sur l’occupation. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47062 |
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 202-203
[article] Préciser les différences et explorer les possibilités de collaboration entre la RCE et les Actualités ergothérapiques [texte imprimé] / Janna MacLachlan ; Jane A. Davis . - 2016 . - p. 202-203. Langues : Français ( fre) in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 202-203
Résumé : |
L’Association canadienne des ergothérapeutes (ACE) dispose de deux plateformes pour publier des articles, soient la Revue canadienne d’ergothérapie (RCE)—une revue examinée par les pairs—et les Actualités ergothérapiques—un périodique axé sur la pratique. Ces deux publications offrent aux membres de l’ACE et aux lecteurs du monde entier des articles de pointe traitant de la portée actuelle de la pratique de l’ergothérapie, de même que du développement de nouvelles possibilités en matière de pratique, dans le contexte canadien. Au cours des dernières années, les comités de rédaction de la RCE et des Actualités ergothérapiques ont discuté de différentes façons de créer des possibilités de collaboration, en vue d’optimiser les occasions offertes par la portée et la nature de la production de chacune des publications. Comme les deux publications évoluent constamment afin de répondre aux milieux dynamiques de la pratique et du processus de publication, cet éditorial vise à décrire la portée de chaque publication, leurs similarités et leurs différences, de même que les possibilités de collaboration en vue de promouvoir la pratique fondée sur les faits et basée sur l’occupation. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47062 |
| |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |
[article]
Titre : |
Partnership in research : A vehicle for reaching higher summits |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Isabelle Gélinas |
Année de publication : |
2016 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 204-213 |
Langues : |
Français (fre) |
Mots-clés : |
Automobile driving Collaborative partnership Occupational therapy Research Scholarship of practice |
Résumé : |
Partnerships in occupational therapy between practitioners and researchers are important to advance knowledge relevant to clinical practice and support evidence-based practice in the profession.
Purpose.
This Muriel Driver lecture discusses why we should support practitioners’ engagement in research and examines essential conditions required for successful collaborative partnerships in research.
Key Issues.
Collaborative partnerships can alleviate the challenges preventing practitioners from participating in research and ensure that research initiatives are more relevant to clinical practice. Key factors for building and sustaining meaningful partnerships include the presence of favourable pre-partnership conditions related to the context and the use of guiding principles focusing on vision, values, trust, communication, power sharing, and interactions.
Implications.
Several of the factors found to foster a good collaborative partnership are consistent with our core competency roles and reflect our professional values. Being mindful of these factors when initiating research collaborations would increase the likelihood of success |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47063 |
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 204-213
[article] Partnership in research : A vehicle for reaching higher summits [texte imprimé] / Isabelle Gélinas . - 2016 . - p. 204-213. Langues : Français ( fre) in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 204-213
Mots-clés : |
Automobile driving Collaborative partnership Occupational therapy Research Scholarship of practice |
Résumé : |
Partnerships in occupational therapy between practitioners and researchers are important to advance knowledge relevant to clinical practice and support evidence-based practice in the profession.
Purpose.
This Muriel Driver lecture discusses why we should support practitioners’ engagement in research and examines essential conditions required for successful collaborative partnerships in research.
Key Issues.
Collaborative partnerships can alleviate the challenges preventing practitioners from participating in research and ensure that research initiatives are more relevant to clinical practice. Key factors for building and sustaining meaningful partnerships include the presence of favourable pre-partnership conditions related to the context and the use of guiding principles focusing on vision, values, trust, communication, power sharing, and interactions.
Implications.
Several of the factors found to foster a good collaborative partnership are consistent with our core competency roles and reflect our professional values. Being mindful of these factors when initiating research collaborations would increase the likelihood of success |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47063 |
| |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |
[article]
Titre : |
The Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP): A scoping review |
Titre original : |
L’approche CO-OP (Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance) : examen de la portée |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Emma Scammel ; Stephanie V. Bates ; Adina Houldin ; Helene J. Polatajko |
Année de publication : |
2016 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 216-225 |
Langues : |
Français (fre) |
Mots-clés : |
études d’intervention pratique fondée sur les faits résolution de problème |
Résumé : |
Background.
The Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach—now trademarked as the CO-OPApproach—was introduced in the literature in 2001 as an intervention to improve real-world performance in children with developmental coordination disorder. CO-OP has since appeared in numerous publications and has seen adoption with various populations. No compilation of the CO-OP literature is available.
Purpose.
The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the extent (number) and nature (features and characteristics) of the literature on CO-OP.
Method.
Using the scoping review methodology outlined by Arksey and O’Malley, 10 online databases were searched for materials discussing CO-OP. Materials found were reviewed by two reviewers, independently. Articles were categorized according to identified study characteristics.
Findings.
In all, 94 documents were found, including 27 research articles examining application and adaptations of CO-OP with eight populations. In all cases, the approach was deemed useful; however, in many cases, adaptations to the CO-OP protocol were recommended.
Implications.
CO-OP has been applied with a number of populations. There is now sufficient research to warrant a systematic review of the research literature. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47064 |
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 216-225
[article] The Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP): A scoping review = L’approche CO-OP (Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance) : examen de la portée [texte imprimé] / Emma Scammel ; Stephanie V. Bates ; Adina Houldin ; Helene J. Polatajko . - 2016 . - p. 216-225. Langues : Français ( fre) in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 216-225
Mots-clés : |
études d’intervention pratique fondée sur les faits résolution de problème |
Résumé : |
Background.
The Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach—now trademarked as the CO-OPApproach—was introduced in the literature in 2001 as an intervention to improve real-world performance in children with developmental coordination disorder. CO-OP has since appeared in numerous publications and has seen adoption with various populations. No compilation of the CO-OP literature is available.
Purpose.
The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the extent (number) and nature (features and characteristics) of the literature on CO-OP.
Method.
Using the scoping review methodology outlined by Arksey and O’Malley, 10 online databases were searched for materials discussing CO-OP. Materials found were reviewed by two reviewers, independently. Articles were categorized according to identified study characteristics.
Findings.
In all, 94 documents were found, including 27 research articles examining application and adaptations of CO-OP with eight populations. In all cases, the approach was deemed useful; however, in many cases, adaptations to the CO-OP protocol were recommended.
Implications.
CO-OP has been applied with a number of populations. There is now sufficient research to warrant a systematic review of the research literature. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47064 |
| |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |
[article]
Titre : |
Preparing for community development practice: A Delphi study of Canadian occupational therapists |
Titre original : |
La préparation requise pour la pratique dans le domaine du développement communautaire : Étude Delphi sur les ergothérapeutes canadiens |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Leanne L. Leclair ; Morgan L. Ashcroft ; Tamara L. Canning ; Marla A. Lisowsky |
Année de publication : |
2016 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 226-236 |
Langues : |
Français (fre) |
Mots-clés : |
compétence clinique connaissances éducation pratique à base communautaire renforcement des compétences |
Résumé : |
Increasingly, community development is recognized as an important process for occupational therapy practice. However, occupational therapists working in community development report feeling unprepared.
Purpose.
This study aimed to identify the knowledge, skills, and experiences that occupational therapists need for practice in community development.
Method.
Using the Delphi technique, the researchers developed statements from the Round 1 (n = 8) responses of occupational therapists involved in community development practice or scholarship. Rounds 2 (n = 14) and 3 (n = 12) sought to establish consensus among the occupational therapists on the areas of focus.
Findings.
Participants rated the importance of 64 statements grouped into 11 domains. After three rounds, researchers eliminated six statements by analyzing the median, interquartile range, and percentage of agreement. Participants reached consensus on 58 statements.
Implications.
Many of the competencies identified were relevant to all areas of practice, while others were specific to community development, suggesting a need for specialized education and training in this area. The results provide information that can be used to enhance the preparation of occupational therapists for practice in community development. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47095 |
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 226-236
[article] Preparing for community development practice: A Delphi study of Canadian occupational therapists = La préparation requise pour la pratique dans le domaine du développement communautaire : Étude Delphi sur les ergothérapeutes canadiens [texte imprimé] / Leanne L. Leclair ; Morgan L. Ashcroft ; Tamara L. Canning ; Marla A. Lisowsky . - 2016 . - p. 226-236. Langues : Français ( fre) in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 226-236
Mots-clés : |
compétence clinique connaissances éducation pratique à base communautaire renforcement des compétences |
Résumé : |
Increasingly, community development is recognized as an important process for occupational therapy practice. However, occupational therapists working in community development report feeling unprepared.
Purpose.
This study aimed to identify the knowledge, skills, and experiences that occupational therapists need for practice in community development.
Method.
Using the Delphi technique, the researchers developed statements from the Round 1 (n = 8) responses of occupational therapists involved in community development practice or scholarship. Rounds 2 (n = 14) and 3 (n = 12) sought to establish consensus among the occupational therapists on the areas of focus.
Findings.
Participants rated the importance of 64 statements grouped into 11 domains. After three rounds, researchers eliminated six statements by analyzing the median, interquartile range, and percentage of agreement. Participants reached consensus on 58 statements.
Implications.
Many of the competencies identified were relevant to all areas of practice, while others were specific to community development, suggesting a need for specialized education and training in this area. The results provide information that can be used to enhance the preparation of occupational therapists for practice in community development. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47095 |
| |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |
[article]
Titre : |
Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool: Clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation |
Titre original : |
Utilité clinique du Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool pour la réadaptation en milieu hospitalier |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Susan W. Darzin ; Christine Imms ; Marilyn Di Stefano ; [et al...] |
Année de publication : |
2016 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 237-248 |
Langues : |
Français (fre) |
Mots-clés : |
activités de la vie quotidienne Classification internationale du fonctionnement du handicap et de la santé (CIF) évaluation des besoins évaluation des résultats (soins de santé) restriction de la participation (CIF) |
Résumé : |
Evidence supports validity of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART), but clinical utility remains unverified.
Purpose.
This study aimed to investigate occupational therapists’ perceptions about the PC-PART’s clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation.
Method.
Using mixed methods, occupational therapists who had used the PC-PART as part of a research study in an inpatient rehabilitation setting completed a questionnaire (n = 9) and participated in a focus group (n = 6) to explore their perspectives about its clinical utility. Quantitative data were summarized and qualitative data analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Findings.
Quantitative data highlighted both positive and negative aspects of the PC-PART’s clinical utility. Five themes emerged from the qualitative data: nature of information gathered; familiarity with the instrument; perceived time and effort; item phrasing, interpretation, and presentation; and external influences on clinical use.
Implications.
The PC-PART was perceived to support gathering of clinically useful information, helpful to intervention and discharge planning. Recommendations for improving some item phrasing, operational definitions, and instructions were identified. Although standardized assessments were valued, use in routine practice was challenging, requiring a knowledge translation strategy. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47096 |
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 237-248
[article] Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool: Clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation = Utilité clinique du Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool pour la réadaptation en milieu hospitalier [texte imprimé] / Susan W. Darzin ; Christine Imms ; Marilyn Di Stefano ; [et al...] . - 2016 . - p. 237-248. Langues : Français ( fre) in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 237-248
Mots-clés : |
activités de la vie quotidienne Classification internationale du fonctionnement du handicap et de la santé (CIF) évaluation des besoins évaluation des résultats (soins de santé) restriction de la participation (CIF) |
Résumé : |
Evidence supports validity of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART), but clinical utility remains unverified.
Purpose.
This study aimed to investigate occupational therapists’ perceptions about the PC-PART’s clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation.
Method.
Using mixed methods, occupational therapists who had used the PC-PART as part of a research study in an inpatient rehabilitation setting completed a questionnaire (n = 9) and participated in a focus group (n = 6) to explore their perspectives about its clinical utility. Quantitative data were summarized and qualitative data analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Findings.
Quantitative data highlighted both positive and negative aspects of the PC-PART’s clinical utility. Five themes emerged from the qualitative data: nature of information gathered; familiarity with the instrument; perceived time and effort; item phrasing, interpretation, and presentation; and external influences on clinical use.
Implications.
The PC-PART was perceived to support gathering of clinically useful information, helpful to intervention and discharge planning. Recommendations for improving some item phrasing, operational definitions, and instructions were identified. Although standardized assessments were valued, use in routine practice was challenging, requiring a knowledge translation strategy. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47096 |
| |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |
[article]
Titre : |
Toward the reconceptualization of the relationship between occupation and health and well-being |
Titre original : |
Vers la reconceptualisation de la relation entre l’occupation et la santé et le bien-être |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Katherine E. Stewart ; Tess M. Fischer ; Rehana Hirji ; Jane A. Davis |
Année de publication : |
2016 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 249-259 |
Langues : |
Français (fre) |
Mots-clés : |
comportements liés à la santé croyances professionnelles discours ergothérapie maladie |
Résumé : |
Foundational to the occupational therapy profession is the belief that engagement in occupation is health promoting; however, this belief fails to account for occupational engagement that may be risky or illness producing. Consensus regarding the nature of the relationship between occupation and health has yet to be achieved.
Purpose.
The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive description of how the relationship between occupation and health and well-being is discussed within the occupational therapy and occupational science literature.
Method.
The methodological framework outlined by Arksey and O’Malley served as the basis for this scoping review of the occupational therapy and occupational science literature.
Findings.
One hundred and twelve articles were identified as meeting the criteria for inclusion. The dominant discourse portrays the relationship between occupation and health as positive.
Implications.
The broader literature suggests that occupational engagement can have both positive and negative effects on health and well-being. As such, the reconceptualization of the relationship between occupation and health and well-being is warranted to enable occupational therapists to practise in a more client-centred manner. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47097 |
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 249-259
[article] Toward the reconceptualization of the relationship between occupation and health and well-being = Vers la reconceptualisation de la relation entre l’occupation et la santé et le bien-être [texte imprimé] / Katherine E. Stewart ; Tess M. Fischer ; Rehana Hirji ; Jane A. Davis . - 2016 . - p. 249-259. Langues : Français ( fre) in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 249-259
Mots-clés : |
comportements liés à la santé croyances professionnelles discours ergothérapie maladie |
Résumé : |
Foundational to the occupational therapy profession is the belief that engagement in occupation is health promoting; however, this belief fails to account for occupational engagement that may be risky or illness producing. Consensus regarding the nature of the relationship between occupation and health has yet to be achieved.
Purpose.
The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive description of how the relationship between occupation and health and well-being is discussed within the occupational therapy and occupational science literature.
Method.
The methodological framework outlined by Arksey and O’Malley served as the basis for this scoping review of the occupational therapy and occupational science literature.
Findings.
One hundred and twelve articles were identified as meeting the criteria for inclusion. The dominant discourse portrays the relationship between occupation and health as positive.
Implications.
The broader literature suggests that occupational engagement can have both positive and negative effects on health and well-being. As such, the reconceptualization of the relationship between occupation and health and well-being is warranted to enable occupational therapists to practise in a more client-centred manner. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47097 |
| |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |