Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn Louvain-la-Neuve
Horaires d'ouverture (en période scolaire)
Lundi, Mardi, Mercredi :
8h30 - 12h30 / 13h15 - 17h
jeudi : matin sur RDV / 13h15 - 17h
vendredi : 8h30 - 12h30 / 13h15 - 15h00
Bienvenue au Centre de documentation de la HELHa Cardijn Louvain-la-Neuve
Le centre de documentation de la HELHa Cardijn LLN met à disposition de ses lecteurs un fonds documentaire spécialisé dans les domaines pouvant intéresser – de près ou de loin - les (futur·e·s) travailleur·euse·s sociaux·ales : travail social, sociologie, psychologie, droit, santé, économie, pédagogie, immigration, vieillissement, famille, précarité, délinquance, emploi, communication, etc.
Catégories
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche
[article]
| Titre : |
Des choix personnels aux orientations politiques : comment décidons-nous ? [Dossier] |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Fabien Trécourt, Directeur de publication, rédacteur en chef |
| Année de publication : |
2022 |
| Article en page(s) : |
p. 29-48 |
| Langues : |
Français (fre) |
| Catégories : |
TS
Choix (psychologie):Prise de décision
|
| Résumé : |
"Trois grandes familles de réponses ont été apportées à cette interrogation. Dès l’Antiquité, la philosophie s’intéresse notamment aux enjeux moraux : se décider, c’est préférer certaines valeurs, un modèle de vie et de société à d’autres. Aux 19e et 20e siècles, l’économie met un fort accent sur la question de la délibération, soit le calcul rationnel des décisions supposées les plus bénéfiques à un individu. Plus près de nous, la psychologie explore à nouveaux frais les choix automatiques que chacun fait au quotidien. Ces trois dimensions ne sont pas forcément exclusives et s’enrichissent même. Entre raison et intuition, préférence morale et subjective, la décision n’a pas fini de livrer ses mystères." |
| Permalink : |
http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=34315 |
in Sciences humaines > 348 (Juin 2022) . - p. 29-48
[article] Des choix personnels aux orientations politiques : comment décidons-nous ? [Dossier] [texte imprimé] / Fabien Trécourt, Directeur de publication, rédacteur en chef . - 2022 . - p. 29-48. Langues : Français ( fre) in Sciences humaines > 348 (Juin 2022) . - p. 29-48
| Catégories : |
TS
Choix (psychologie):Prise de décision
|
| Résumé : |
"Trois grandes familles de réponses ont été apportées à cette interrogation. Dès l’Antiquité, la philosophie s’intéresse notamment aux enjeux moraux : se décider, c’est préférer certaines valeurs, un modèle de vie et de société à d’autres. Aux 19e et 20e siècles, l’économie met un fort accent sur la question de la délibération, soit le calcul rationnel des décisions supposées les plus bénéfiques à un individu. Plus près de nous, la psychologie explore à nouveaux frais les choix automatiques que chacun fait au quotidien. Ces trois dimensions ne sont pas forcément exclusives et s’enrichissent même. Entre raison et intuition, préférence morale et subjective, la décision n’a pas fini de livrer ses mystères." |
| Permalink : |
http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=34315 |
|  |
Exemplaires (1)
|
| PER SHU 348 (2022) | Périodique | Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn LLN | Salle de lecture (Périodiques) | Disponible |
: le "pouvoir judiciaire est de retour
Exemplaires (1)
|
| PER ESP 271 (2001) | Périodique | Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn LLN | Réserve Périodiques | Disponible |
: The Use of Experiential and Analytical Cognitive Processes
[article]
| Titre : |
Decision Making in Social Work with Children and Families : The Use of Experiential and Analytical Cognitive Processes |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Simon Hackett, Auteur ; Taylor, Abi, Auteur |
| Editeur : |
Oxford University Press |
| Année de publication : |
2014 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 2182-2199 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Catégories : |
Cardijn
Evaluation
TS
Choix (psychologie):Prise de décision # Expérience
|
| Résumé : |
"Documentary analysis of ninety-eight core assessments of children and families was used as a means of investigating social workers' cognitive decision-making processes. Follow-up semi-structured interviews were carried out with the fifty social workers responsible for completing these assessments. Particular focus was given to investigating the use of experiential and analytical decision making and the effects of case and environmental characteristics. Statistical tests and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) were used in order to explore the causal mechanisms affecting the decision process. Whilst decision making was primarily experiential, relying on social workers' prior casework experience and intuition, there was fluidity between modes of cognition. Typically, analytical cognition was used as a check or backup to experiential decision strategies. Variations in decision-making strategies were found due to a range and combination of case characteristics and environmental factors. Of particular importance were the dynamic nature of the decision environment, whether the family was previously known to social services, the level of risk involved, the familiarity of the worker with the case type and whether strong evidence was needed to support decision making. Implications for social work policy and practice are discussed." |
| Permalink : |
http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=21413 |
in The british journal of social work > 8, vol. 44 (December 2014) . - pp. 2182-2199
[article] Decision Making in Social Work with Children and Families : The Use of Experiential and Analytical Cognitive Processes [texte imprimé] / Simon Hackett, Auteur ; Taylor, Abi, Auteur . - [S.l.] : Oxford University Press, 2014 . - pp. 2182-2199. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in The british journal of social work > 8, vol. 44 (December 2014) . - pp. 2182-2199
| Catégories : |
Cardijn
Evaluation
TS
Choix (psychologie):Prise de décision # Expérience
|
| Résumé : |
"Documentary analysis of ninety-eight core assessments of children and families was used as a means of investigating social workers' cognitive decision-making processes. Follow-up semi-structured interviews were carried out with the fifty social workers responsible for completing these assessments. Particular focus was given to investigating the use of experiential and analytical decision making and the effects of case and environmental characteristics. Statistical tests and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) were used in order to explore the causal mechanisms affecting the decision process. Whilst decision making was primarily experiential, relying on social workers' prior casework experience and intuition, there was fluidity between modes of cognition. Typically, analytical cognition was used as a check or backup to experiential decision strategies. Variations in decision-making strategies were found due to a range and combination of case characteristics and environmental factors. Of particular importance were the dynamic nature of the decision environment, whether the family was previously known to social services, the level of risk involved, the familiarity of the worker with the case type and whether strong evidence was needed to support decision making. Implications for social work policy and practice are discussed." |
| Permalink : |
http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=21413 |
|
Exemplaires (1)
|
| PER BJS 44/8 (2014) | Périodique | Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn LLN | Réserve Périodiques | Disponible |
[article]
| Titre : |
Decision-Making Tools and Their Influence on Caseworkers' Room for Discretion |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Matilde Høybye-Mortensen |
| Editeur : |
Oxford University Press |
| Année de publication : |
2015 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 600-615 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Catégories : |
Cardijn
Evaluation
TS
Choix (psychologie):Prise de décision # Etudes de cas
|
| Résumé : |
"One of the cornerstones in the provision of social services in modern welfare states is decision making about who is eligible for particular services or benefits. Here, the central decision maker is the caseworker who assesses clients? needs and obligations. In response to concerns regarding decision-making processes and outcomes, decision-making tools directing how a decision should be made and documented are implemented. The literature on front line workers and regulation provides no clear answers concerning the relationship between regulation, such as decision-making tools, and room for discretion. This article explores how decision-making tools affect caseworkers? room for discretion. The article reports on findings from a qualitative cross-sector study of three decision-making tools used in employment services, child protection and elderly services in Denmark. The empirical data consist of thirty group interviews with caseworkers. Even though all of the tools are in the shape of a form that is to be filled in, differences are found across decision-making tools. For instance, it seems as though forms based on a theoretical foundation have greater impact on caseworkers? room for discretion than those based on an understanding of information as neutral and objective, since the latter requires intensive interpretation on the part of the caseworkers." |
| Permalink : |
http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=21461 |
in The british journal of social work > 2, vol. 45 (March 2015) . - pp. 600-615
[article] Decision-Making Tools and Their Influence on Caseworkers' Room for Discretion [texte imprimé] / Matilde Høybye-Mortensen . - [S.l.] : Oxford University Press, 2015 . - pp. 600-615. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in The british journal of social work > 2, vol. 45 (March 2015) . - pp. 600-615
| Catégories : |
Cardijn
Evaluation
TS
Choix (psychologie):Prise de décision # Etudes de cas
|
| Résumé : |
"One of the cornerstones in the provision of social services in modern welfare states is decision making about who is eligible for particular services or benefits. Here, the central decision maker is the caseworker who assesses clients? needs and obligations. In response to concerns regarding decision-making processes and outcomes, decision-making tools directing how a decision should be made and documented are implemented. The literature on front line workers and regulation provides no clear answers concerning the relationship between regulation, such as decision-making tools, and room for discretion. This article explores how decision-making tools affect caseworkers? room for discretion. The article reports on findings from a qualitative cross-sector study of three decision-making tools used in employment services, child protection and elderly services in Denmark. The empirical data consist of thirty group interviews with caseworkers. Even though all of the tools are in the shape of a form that is to be filled in, differences are found across decision-making tools. For instance, it seems as though forms based on a theoretical foundation have greater impact on caseworkers? room for discretion than those based on an understanding of information as neutral and objective, since the latter requires intensive interpretation on the part of the caseworkers." |
| Permalink : |
http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=21461 |
|
Exemplaires (1)
|
| PER BJS 45/2 (2015) | Périodique | Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn LLN | Réserve Périodiques | Disponible |
: Lessons from Judgment and Decision-Making Theory
[article]
| Titre : |
Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work : Lessons from Judgment and Decision-Making Theory |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Guido M. J. van de Luitgaarden, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2009 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 243-260 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Catégories : |
Cardijn
Pratique professionnelle # Travail social
TS
Choix (psychologie):Prise de décision
|
| Résumé : |
"This paper introduces a critique of the experimentalist strand of the evidence-based practice movement in social work. It does so by drawing on the available body of knowledge that is found within the field of judgment and decision making. The nexus between experimentalist evidence-based practice and rational choice approaches to social work decision making is demonstrated. Subsequently, it argues that the properties of social work decision tasks are more likely to facilitate naturalistic than analytical decision making strategies. Recognition-primed decision making is introduced as a possible alternative to practice guidelines and decision aids. Finally, the consequences of embracing the principles of recognition-primed decision making are considered regarding social work practice, education and research." |
| Permalink : |
http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14294 |
in The british journal of social work > 2, vol. 39 (March 2009) . - pp. 243-260
[article] Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work : Lessons from Judgment and Decision-Making Theory [texte imprimé] / Guido M. J. van de Luitgaarden, Auteur . - 2009 . - pp. 243-260. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in The british journal of social work > 2, vol. 39 (March 2009) . - pp. 243-260
| Catégories : |
Cardijn
Pratique professionnelle # Travail social
TS
Choix (psychologie):Prise de décision
|
| Résumé : |
"This paper introduces a critique of the experimentalist strand of the evidence-based practice movement in social work. It does so by drawing on the available body of knowledge that is found within the field of judgment and decision making. The nexus between experimentalist evidence-based practice and rational choice approaches to social work decision making is demonstrated. Subsequently, it argues that the properties of social work decision tasks are more likely to facilitate naturalistic than analytical decision making strategies. Recognition-primed decision making is introduced as a possible alternative to practice guidelines and decision aids. Finally, the consequences of embracing the principles of recognition-primed decision making are considered regarding social work practice, education and research." |
| Permalink : |
http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14294 |
|
Exemplaires (1)
|
| PER BJS 39/2 (2009) | Périodique | Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn LLN | Réserve Périodiques | Disponible |
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
: Will Tackling Court Delay Result in Pre-Court Delay in its Place?
Permalink
Permalink
