Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn Louvain-la-Neuve
Horaires d'ouverture (en période scolaire)
Lundi, Mardi, Mercredi :
8h30 - 12h30 / 13h15 - 17h
jeudi : matin sur RDV / 13h15 - 17h
vendredi : 8h30 - 12h30 / 13h15 - 15h00
Bienvenue au Centre de documentation de la HELHa Cardijn Louvain-la-Neuve
Le centre de documentation de la HELHa Cardijn LLN met à disposition de ses lecteurs un fonds documentaire spécialisé dans les domaines pouvant intéresser – de près ou de loin - les (futur·e·s) travailleur·euse·s sociaux·ales : travail social, sociologie, psychologie, droit, santé, économie, pédagogie, immigration, vieillissement, famille, précarité, délinquance, emploi, communication, etc.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Wilkins, David |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche
Balancing Risk and Protective Factors : How Do Social Workers and Social Work Managers Analyse Referrals that May Indicate Children Are at Risk of Significant Harm / Wilkins, David in The british journal of social work, 1, vol. 45 (January 2015)
[article]
Titre : Balancing Risk and Protective Factors : How Do Social Workers and Social Work Managers Analyse Referrals that May Indicate Children Are at Risk of Significant Harm Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Wilkins, David, Auteur Editeur : Oxford University Press Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : pp. 395-411 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Cardijn
Evaluation # Risque # Travail socialRésumé : "This paper is based upon the findings of a qualitative study of how child protection social workers and social work managers analyse referrals. The study involved interviews with eighteen participants based on four vignettes of children potentially at risk of emotional, physical or sexual abuse or neglect. Three themes in particular are discussed?the balancing of risk, protective and resilience factors; the use of family history and the child's wider circumstances; and ?known? and ?unknown? unknowns (?missing information?). These findings are considered in relation to the potential use of actuarial risk assessment tools or Structured Decisions Making tools in child protection social work. The first of two conclusions is that when given adequate space and time the participants tended to be to be reflective and analytical, but that difficulties remained in their ability to analyse the referrals, in particular with the identification of protective or resilience factors and in the balancing of risk and protective or resilience factors in relation to individual children. The second conclusion is that social workers and managers may benefit from assistance in identifying protective and resilience factors (and distinguishing between protective factors and resilience factors) in particular and this may offer a focus for the introduction of structured tools as a way to support current practice rather than to replace it." Permalink : http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=21450
in The british journal of social work > 1, vol. 45 (January 2015) . - pp. 395-411[article] Balancing Risk and Protective Factors : How Do Social Workers and Social Work Managers Analyse Referrals that May Indicate Children Are at Risk of Significant Harm [texte imprimé] / Wilkins, David, Auteur . - [S.l.] : Oxford University Press, 2015 . - pp. 395-411.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in The british journal of social work > 1, vol. 45 (January 2015) . - pp. 395-411
Catégories : Cardijn
Evaluation # Risque # Travail socialRésumé : "This paper is based upon the findings of a qualitative study of how child protection social workers and social work managers analyse referrals. The study involved interviews with eighteen participants based on four vignettes of children potentially at risk of emotional, physical or sexual abuse or neglect. Three themes in particular are discussed?the balancing of risk, protective and resilience factors; the use of family history and the child's wider circumstances; and ?known? and ?unknown? unknowns (?missing information?). These findings are considered in relation to the potential use of actuarial risk assessment tools or Structured Decisions Making tools in child protection social work. The first of two conclusions is that when given adequate space and time the participants tended to be to be reflective and analytical, but that difficulties remained in their ability to analyse the referrals, in particular with the identification of protective or resilience factors and in the balancing of risk and protective or resilience factors in relation to individual children. The second conclusion is that social workers and managers may benefit from assistance in identifying protective and resilience factors (and distinguishing between protective factors and resilience factors) in particular and this may offer a focus for the introduction of structured tools as a way to support current practice rather than to replace it." Permalink : http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=21450 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité PER BJS 45/1 (2015) Périodique Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn LLN Réserve Périodiques Disponible