Reasoning Processes in Child Protection Decision Making : Negotiating Moral Minefields and Risky Relationships / Emily Keddell in The british journal of social work, 7, vol. 41 (October 2011)

Public ISBD [article]  inThe british journal of social work > 7, vol. 41 (October 2011) . - pp. 1251-1270 Titre : Reasoning Processes in Child Protection Decision Making : Negotiating Moral Minefields and Risky Relationships Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Emily Keddell, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : pp. 1251-1270 Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Cardijn Pratique # Pratique professionnelle # Travail social TS Enfants:Enfants -- Protection, assistance, etc. Résumé : "This paper investigates the reasoning processes of social workers in child protection social work as they make decisions. Within this interpretive process, they assign meaning to clients' behaviours in a context containing a multitude of competing discourses relating to the nature and cause of clients' problems. The study used a qualitative approach, specifically a critical incident framework. It asked workers to describe cases they felt ‘pleased with’ and explain the reasoning processes they used in those cases. It also asked clients their views of decisions made about them." Permalink : http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=16702 [article] Reasoning Processes in Child Protection Decision Making : Negotiating Moral Minefields and Risky Relationships [texte imprimé] / Emily Keddell, Auteur . - 2011 . - pp. 1251-1270. Langues : Anglais (eng) in The british journal of social work > 7, vol. 41 (October 2011) . - pp. 1251-1270 Catégories : Cardijn Pratique # Pratique professionnelle # Travail social TS Enfants:Enfants -- Protection, assistance, etc. Résumé : "This paper investigates the reasoning processes of social workers in child protection social work as they make decisions. Within this interpretive process, they assign meaning to clients' behaviours in a context containing a multitude of competing discourses relating to the nature and cause of clients' problems. The study used a qualitative approach, specifically a critical incident framework. It asked workers to describe cases they felt ‘pleased with’ and explain the reasoning processes they used in those cases. It also asked clients their views of decisions made about them." Permalink : http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=16702

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
PER BJS 41/7 (2011)	Périodique	Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn LLN	Réserve Périodiques	Disponible

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1)