Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn Louvain-la-Neuve
Horaires d'ouverture (en période scolaire)
Lundi, Mardi, Mercredi :
8h30 - 12h30 / 13h15 - 17h
jeudi : matin sur RDV / 13h15 - 17h
vendredi : 8h30 - 12h30 / 13h15 - 15h00
Fermé exceptionnellement toute la journée des mardi 3 juin, vendredi 13 juin, lundi 23 juin et la matinée du mardi 1er juillet 2025
Fermé pour l'été 2025 du 14 juillet au 17 août inclus
Bienvenue au Centre de documentation de la HELHa Cardijn Louvain-la-Neuve
Le centre de documentation de la HELHa Cardijn LLN met à disposition de ses lecteurs un fonds documentaire spécialisé dans les domaines pouvant intéresser – de près ou de loin - les (futur·e·s) travailleur·euse·s sociaux·ales : travail social, sociologie, psychologie, droit, santé, économie, pédagogie, immigration, vieillissement, famille, précarité, délinquance, emploi, communication, etc.
Détail de l'auteur
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche

: Student Placements in Campaigning Organisations and Social Movements in South Africa
Exemplaires (1)
|
PER BJS 42/5 (2012) | Périodique | Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn LLN | Réserve Périodiques | Disponible |

[article]
Titre : |
Increasing User Choice or Privatizing Risk? The Antinomies of Personalization |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Iain Ferguson, Auteur |
Editeur : |
Oxford : Oxford university press - GB - Oxford |
Année de publication : |
2007 |
Article en page(s) : |
pp. 387-403. |
Langues : |
Anglo-saxon (ang) |
Catégories : |
Cardijn Profession # Responsabilité # Travail social TS Société de consommation
|
Mots-clés : |
Travail social Responsabilité Profession Consommation |
Résumé : |
"Within a very short space of time, the concept of personalization has come to occupy a central place within dominant social work and adult care discourses within the UK. Through an analysis of one influential model of personalization, this paper will explore the factors behind the concept’s current popularity. I shall argue that this popularity is due primarily to its congruence with key themes of New Labour thought, including individualization, responsibilization and the transfer of risk from the state to the individual. I shall conclude that, given its acceptance of the marketization of social work and social care, its neglect of issues of poverty and inequality, its flawed conception of the people who use social work services, its potentially stigmatizing view of welfare dependency and its potential for promoting, rather than challenging, the deprofessionalization of social work, the philosophy of personalization is not one that social workers should accept uncritically." |
Permalink : |
http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=12807 |
in The british journal of social work > 3, vol. 37 (avril 2007) . - pp. 387-403.
[article] Increasing User Choice or Privatizing Risk? The Antinomies of Personalization [texte imprimé] / Iain Ferguson, Auteur . - Oxford : Oxford university press - GB - Oxford, 2007 . - pp. 387-403. Langues : Anglo-saxon ( ang) in The british journal of social work > 3, vol. 37 (avril 2007) . - pp. 387-403.
Catégories : |
Cardijn Profession # Responsabilité # Travail social TS Société de consommation
|
Mots-clés : |
Travail social Responsabilité Profession Consommation |
Résumé : |
"Within a very short space of time, the concept of personalization has come to occupy a central place within dominant social work and adult care discourses within the UK. Through an analysis of one influential model of personalization, this paper will explore the factors behind the concept’s current popularity. I shall argue that this popularity is due primarily to its congruence with key themes of New Labour thought, including individualization, responsibilization and the transfer of risk from the state to the individual. I shall conclude that, given its acceptance of the marketization of social work and social care, its neglect of issues of poverty and inequality, its flawed conception of the people who use social work services, its potentially stigmatizing view of welfare dependency and its potential for promoting, rather than challenging, the deprofessionalization of social work, the philosophy of personalization is not one that social workers should accept uncritically." |
Permalink : |
http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=12807 |
|
Exemplaires (1)
|
PER BJS 37/3 (2007) | Périodique | Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn LLN | Réserve Périodiques | Disponible |