Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Attention, votre centre de documentation sera fermé ce vendredi 17 mai.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Attention, votre centre de documentation sera fermé ce vendredi 17 mai.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Résultat de la recherche
2 résultat(s) recherche sur le mot-clé 'pratique centrée sur le client'
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Beyond research literature: Occupational therapists’ perspectives on and uses of “evidence” in everyday practice / Deborah A. Dougherty in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83(5) (Décembre 2016)
[article]
Titre : Beyond research literature: Occupational therapists’ perspectives on and uses of “evidence” in everyday practice Titre original : Au-delà de la littérature scientifique : Les perspectives des ergothérapeutes sur les « faits probants » et leur usage dans la pratique quotidienne Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Deborah A. Dougherty ; Susan E. Toth-Cohen ; George Tomlin Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : p. 288-296 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : ergothérapie pratique centrée sur le client pratique fondée sur les faits probants raisonnement clinique recherche qualitative Résumé : Background.
Recent literature in evidence-based practice indicates that evidence is defined differently from practice and research perspectives. However, few published works address therapists’ perspectives of the nature and use of evidence in everyday practice.
Purpose.
This study describes the definition, types, and use of evidence from the perspective of six school-based occupational therapists.
Method.
Data were collected through focus groups and participant-submitted documentation and analyzed using qualitative and quantitative content analysis.
Findings.
Two categories of evidence emerged: internalized evidence and evidence gathered during the intervention process. Clinical reasoning, identified as a key skill in evidence-based practice, supported the synthesis of therapist internalized evidence with “in-the-moment” evidence gathered from activity, contextual, and occupational analyses of the client.
Implications.
The findings support current literature that has suggested expanding the definition of evidence (i.e., more than research findings alone). Further investigation of evidence building in practice may help in constructing a more inclusive professional culture of evidence-based practice.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47798
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(5) (Décembre 2016) . - p. 288-296[article] Beyond research literature: Occupational therapists’ perspectives on and uses of “evidence” in everyday practice = Au-delà de la littérature scientifique : Les perspectives des ergothérapeutes sur les « faits probants » et leur usage dans la pratique quotidienne [texte imprimé] / Deborah A. Dougherty ; Susan E. Toth-Cohen ; George Tomlin . - 2016 . - p. 288-296.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(5) (Décembre 2016) . - p. 288-296
Mots-clés : ergothérapie pratique centrée sur le client pratique fondée sur les faits probants raisonnement clinique recherche qualitative Résumé : Background.
Recent literature in evidence-based practice indicates that evidence is defined differently from practice and research perspectives. However, few published works address therapists’ perspectives of the nature and use of evidence in everyday practice.
Purpose.
This study describes the definition, types, and use of evidence from the perspective of six school-based occupational therapists.
Method.
Data were collected through focus groups and participant-submitted documentation and analyzed using qualitative and quantitative content analysis.
Findings.
Two categories of evidence emerged: internalized evidence and evidence gathered during the intervention process. Clinical reasoning, identified as a key skill in evidence-based practice, supported the synthesis of therapist internalized evidence with “in-the-moment” evidence gathered from activity, contextual, and occupational analyses of the client.
Implications.
The findings support current literature that has suggested expanding the definition of evidence (i.e., more than research findings alone). Further investigation of evidence building in practice may help in constructing a more inclusive professional culture of evidence-based practice.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47798 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtHow attention to everyday technology could contribute to modern occupational therapy: A focus group study / Louise Nygard in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol.79 N°8 (August 2016)
[article]
Titre : How attention to everyday technology could contribute to modern occupational therapy: A focus group study Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Louise Nygard ; Lena Rosenberg Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : p. 467-474 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : ergothérapie communication technologie pratique centrée sur le client Résumé : Introduction Everyday technologies such as mobile phones and ticket vending machines have become increasingly indispensable, profoundly influencing daily life activities. Yet this has been given little attention in occupational therapy. The aim of this study was to explore occupational therapists’ views on everyday technologies’ relevance, meaning and potential applicability in practice.
Method Focus groups were undertaken with 42 occupational therapists who had been introduced to an assessment of people’s ability to use everyday technologies. Data comprised eight focus groups and were analysed with a constant comparative approach.
Findings The findings show how the participants’ fields of vision expanded when they discovered new ways of using information related to their clients’ everyday technology use, and new roles as therapists that would help make occupational therapy ‘modern’, that is, more timely and up-to-date. However, this also implied a risk of receiving information that was considered potentially unethical if the detected problems could not be dealt with.
Conclusion Attending to clients as everyday technology users could give occupational therapists new expert roles, and allow clients to be seen as more complete persons. However, as this opportunity also involves priority conflicts and ethical dilemmas, the issue can inspire critical discussion about client-centred occupational therapy.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=45786
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.79 N°8 (August 2016) . - p. 467-474[article] How attention to everyday technology could contribute to modern occupational therapy: A focus group study [texte imprimé] / Louise Nygard ; Lena Rosenberg . - 2016 . - p. 467-474.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.79 N°8 (August 2016) . - p. 467-474
Mots-clés : ergothérapie communication technologie pratique centrée sur le client Résumé : Introduction Everyday technologies such as mobile phones and ticket vending machines have become increasingly indispensable, profoundly influencing daily life activities. Yet this has been given little attention in occupational therapy. The aim of this study was to explore occupational therapists’ views on everyday technologies’ relevance, meaning and potential applicability in practice.
Method Focus groups were undertaken with 42 occupational therapists who had been introduced to an assessment of people’s ability to use everyday technologies. Data comprised eight focus groups and were analysed with a constant comparative approach.
Findings The findings show how the participants’ fields of vision expanded when they discovered new ways of using information related to their clients’ everyday technology use, and new roles as therapists that would help make occupational therapy ‘modern’, that is, more timely and up-to-date. However, this also implied a risk of receiving information that was considered potentially unethical if the detected problems could not be dealt with.
Conclusion Attending to clients as everyday technology users could give occupational therapists new expert roles, and allow clients to be seen as more complete persons. However, as this opportunity also involves priority conflicts and ethical dilemmas, the issue can inspire critical discussion about client-centred occupational therapy.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=45786 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt