Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Attention, votre centre de documentation sera fermé ce vendredi 17 mai.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Attention, votre centre de documentation sera fermé ce vendredi 17 mai.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Résultat de la recherche
2 résultat(s) recherche sur le mot-clé 'bilateral'
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Outcomes Of Bilateral Sacroiliac Joint Fusions And The Importance Of Understanding Potential Coexisting Lumbosacral Pathology That Might Also Require Surgical Treatment / Bruce E. DALL in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, Vol 81/2 (Juin 2015)
[article]
Titre : Outcomes Of Bilateral Sacroiliac Joint Fusions And The Importance Of Understanding Potential Coexisting Lumbosacral Pathology That Might Also Require Surgical Treatment Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Bruce E. DALL, Auteur ; Sonia V. EDEN, Auteur Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : p.233-239 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Sacroiliac joint fusion surgery, outcomes bilateral lumbosacral algorithm treatment Résumé : Only one study in the literature describes performing a bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion, and the results were poor. Many patients needing a bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion frequently have had previous lumbosacral surgeries and present with lumbosacral pain as well. This study reviews our results in consecutive patients having had a bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion over a five-year period. Fifteen patients had bilateral sacroiliac joint fusions with 13 having concurrent lumbosacral fusions. The modified posterior midline fascial splitting approach, first described by Belanger was utilized. Patients were followed for an average of 30.3 months. There were no infections, neurovascular injuries, lasting morbidity or deaths. One non-union of a sacroiliac joint (7%) occurred, which after revision was satisfactory. There was a statistically significant drop in pain (p = 0.01488) using the VAS, and patient satisfaction rates were 86%. With all those patients saying they would have the surgery again for the same result. There was no significant increase in functionality. Patients needing bilateral sacroiliac joint fusions frequently fall into the “failed back” category, and it is important to evaluate both the sacroiliac joints and the lumbosacral spine for potential pain generators. This study shows that by treating all the pain generators in both areas there were significant decreases in pain, low complications, low re-operation rates, and high patient satisfaction scores. Overall functionality, however, was not positively affected. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=40565
in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol 81/2 (Juin 2015) . - p.233-239[article] Outcomes Of Bilateral Sacroiliac Joint Fusions And The Importance Of Understanding Potential Coexisting Lumbosacral Pathology That Might Also Require Surgical Treatment [texte imprimé] / Bruce E. DALL, Auteur ; Sonia V. EDEN, Auteur . - 2015 . - p.233-239.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol 81/2 (Juin 2015) . - p.233-239
Mots-clés : Sacroiliac joint fusion surgery, outcomes bilateral lumbosacral algorithm treatment Résumé : Only one study in the literature describes performing a bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion, and the results were poor. Many patients needing a bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion frequently have had previous lumbosacral surgeries and present with lumbosacral pain as well. This study reviews our results in consecutive patients having had a bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion over a five-year period. Fifteen patients had bilateral sacroiliac joint fusions with 13 having concurrent lumbosacral fusions. The modified posterior midline fascial splitting approach, first described by Belanger was utilized. Patients were followed for an average of 30.3 months. There were no infections, neurovascular injuries, lasting morbidity or deaths. One non-union of a sacroiliac joint (7%) occurred, which after revision was satisfactory. There was a statistically significant drop in pain (p = 0.01488) using the VAS, and patient satisfaction rates were 86%. With all those patients saying they would have the surgery again for the same result. There was no significant increase in functionality. Patients needing bilateral sacroiliac joint fusions frequently fall into the “failed back” category, and it is important to evaluate both the sacroiliac joints and the lumbosacral spine for potential pain generators. This study shows that by treating all the pain generators in both areas there were significant decreases in pain, low complications, low re-operation rates, and high patient satisfaction scores. Overall functionality, however, was not positively affected. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=40565 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtThe demographics and outcomes in patients with bilateral distal radius fractures / Matthew Gonzalez in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, Vol.87/2 (Juin 2021)
[article]
Titre : The demographics and outcomes in patients with bilateral distal radius fractures Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Matthew Gonzalez ; Ayesha Rahman ; Philipp Leucht ; Tejwani Nirmal Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : p. 219-225 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.52628/87.2.03 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : distal radius bilateral fracture wrist demographics outcomes Résumé : Although distal radius fractures are quite common, bilateral distal radius fractures seldomly occur. Due to this, treatment is primarily based on surgeon experience with unilateral fractures, however bi- lateral fractures add a level of complexity : loss of functional independence. The purpose of this study was to examine a cohort of patients with bilateral distal radius fractures to identify differences in demographics, mechanism of injury, and outcomes to further our understanding of these rare injuries. 23 patients were identified retrospectively over a 5-year period that met inclusion criteria. The medical records were reviewed with multiple demographic and clinical parameters recorded and analyzed. Males were more likely to sustain high-energy mechanisms (80% vs. 53%). Patients <50 years old were more likely to sustain high-energy mechanisms (90% vs. 46%) and were more likely to be treated operatively (80% vs. 62%). The most commonly associated injury was a head injury (30%). All patients treated non-operatively reported minimal/no pain upon final follow-up where 57% of patients treated operatively noted regular pain. 75% of patients with medical comorbidities had minimal/no pain upon final follow- up. Conclusions : Patients with bilateral fractures were more likely to be younger males who suffered from higher energy mechanisms. Age was a critical factor in determining treatment strategy. Rates of associated head injuries were elevated, which is an important factor for the clinician to keep in mind when treating this population. As we further our understanding of this unique population, we can improve our treatment approaches and subsequently attain better outcomes. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96621
in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol.87/2 (Juin 2021) . - p. 219-225[article] The demographics and outcomes in patients with bilateral distal radius fractures [texte imprimé] / Matthew Gonzalez ; Ayesha Rahman ; Philipp Leucht ; Tejwani Nirmal . - 2021 . - p. 219-225.
https://doi.org/10.52628/87.2.03
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol.87/2 (Juin 2021) . - p. 219-225
Mots-clés : distal radius bilateral fracture wrist demographics outcomes Résumé : Although distal radius fractures are quite common, bilateral distal radius fractures seldomly occur. Due to this, treatment is primarily based on surgeon experience with unilateral fractures, however bi- lateral fractures add a level of complexity : loss of functional independence. The purpose of this study was to examine a cohort of patients with bilateral distal radius fractures to identify differences in demographics, mechanism of injury, and outcomes to further our understanding of these rare injuries. 23 patients were identified retrospectively over a 5-year period that met inclusion criteria. The medical records were reviewed with multiple demographic and clinical parameters recorded and analyzed. Males were more likely to sustain high-energy mechanisms (80% vs. 53%). Patients <50 years old were more likely to sustain high-energy mechanisms (90% vs. 46%) and were more likely to be treated operatively (80% vs. 62%). The most commonly associated injury was a head injury (30%). All patients treated non-operatively reported minimal/no pain upon final follow-up where 57% of patients treated operatively noted regular pain. 75% of patients with medical comorbidities had minimal/no pain upon final follow- up. Conclusions : Patients with bilateral fractures were more likely to be younger males who suffered from higher energy mechanisms. Age was a critical factor in determining treatment strategy. Rates of associated head injuries were elevated, which is an important factor for the clinician to keep in mind when treating this population. As we further our understanding of this unique population, we can improve our treatment approaches and subsequently attain better outcomes. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96621 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt