Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Attention, votre centre de documentation sera fermé ce vendredi 17 mai.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Attention, votre centre de documentation sera fermé ce vendredi 17 mai.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Elsa A. Spaans |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Acute femoral fracture does not compromise the outcome of total hip arthroplasty : 5 year results from a single center cohort study in 2,782 patients / Stefan B.T. Bolder in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, Vol.87/2 (Juin 2021)
[article]
Titre : Acute femoral fracture does not compromise the outcome of total hip arthroplasty : 5 year results from a single center cohort study in 2,782 patients Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Stefan B.T. Bolder ; Elsa A. Spaans ; Joost A.A.M. Van Den Hout ; Robert Wagenmakers ; Keon L.M. Koenraadt Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : p. 332-338 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.52628/87.2.19 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : hip arthroplasty femoral neck fracture osteoarthritis Résumé : National arthroplasty registries reveal a higher risk of revision for periprosthetic fracture and dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with a femoral neck fracture compared to those with osteoarthritis (OA). Since these registries may con- tain confounding factors, we conducted a single center cohort study comparing survival and reason for failure between THA for an acute femoral neck fracture and OA using the same hip prosthesis after a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
We retrospectively analyzed 2782 patients who had undergone THA with an Accolade TMZF stem and a Trident cup between March 2009 and September 2014. Primary diagnosis before THA was osteoarthritis (OA group : n=2610) or acute femoral fracture (Fracture group : n=172). Patients in both groups were operated on by the same hip surgeons. Effect of diagnosis on THA survival was analyzed using Cox-regression analysis. Chi-square tests were used to illustrate the different reasons for revision between the groups.
Mean follow-up was 4.6 years (2-7.6). A total of 100 revisions were performed. The revision risk was comparable between the OA and Fracture group (HR=1.04, 95% CI :0.46-2.39). No differences were found between the OA and Fracture group with respect to the occurrence of periprosthetic fractures (0.8% vs. 0.6%, p=0.71) and revisions for dislocation (0.6% vs. 1.2%, p=0.38).
We found no difference in outcome or reason for revision between THA for OA or femoral neck frac- ture. Using an implant with a proven ODEP rating and having experienced hip surgeons carry out the procedures may be more important than the primary diagnosis.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96669
in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol.87/2 (Juin 2021) . - p. 332-338[article] Acute femoral fracture does not compromise the outcome of total hip arthroplasty : 5 year results from a single center cohort study in 2,782 patients [texte imprimé] / Stefan B.T. Bolder ; Elsa A. Spaans ; Joost A.A.M. Van Den Hout ; Robert Wagenmakers ; Keon L.M. Koenraadt . - 2021 . - p. 332-338.
https://doi.org/10.52628/87.2.19
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol.87/2 (Juin 2021) . - p. 332-338
Mots-clés : hip arthroplasty femoral neck fracture osteoarthritis Résumé : National arthroplasty registries reveal a higher risk of revision for periprosthetic fracture and dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with a femoral neck fracture compared to those with osteoarthritis (OA). Since these registries may con- tain confounding factors, we conducted a single center cohort study comparing survival and reason for failure between THA for an acute femoral neck fracture and OA using the same hip prosthesis after a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
We retrospectively analyzed 2782 patients who had undergone THA with an Accolade TMZF stem and a Trident cup between March 2009 and September 2014. Primary diagnosis before THA was osteoarthritis (OA group : n=2610) or acute femoral fracture (Fracture group : n=172). Patients in both groups were operated on by the same hip surgeons. Effect of diagnosis on THA survival was analyzed using Cox-regression analysis. Chi-square tests were used to illustrate the different reasons for revision between the groups.
Mean follow-up was 4.6 years (2-7.6). A total of 100 revisions were performed. The revision risk was comparable between the OA and Fracture group (HR=1.04, 95% CI :0.46-2.39). No differences were found between the OA and Fracture group with respect to the occurrence of periprosthetic fractures (0.8% vs. 0.6%, p=0.71) and revisions for dislocation (0.6% vs. 1.2%, p=0.38).
We found no difference in outcome or reason for revision between THA for OA or femoral neck frac- ture. Using an implant with a proven ODEP rating and having experienced hip surgeons carry out the procedures may be more important than the primary diagnosis.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96669 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt