[article]
Titre : |
A systematic review of porcine models in translational pain research |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Suzan Meijs ; Martin Schmelz ; Sigal Meilin ; Winnie Jensen |
Année de publication : |
2021 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 8-24 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Animals Models, Animal Pain / veterinary Pain Measurement Proteomics Swine Translational Research, Biomedical Systematic Review |
Résumé : |
Translating basic pain research from rodents to humans has proven to be a challenging task. Efforts have been made to develop preclinical large animal models of pain, such as the pig. However, no consistent overview and comparison of pig models of pain are currently available. Therefore, in this review, our primary aim was to identify the available pig models in pain research and compare these models in terms of intensity and duration. First, we systematically searched Proquest, Scopus and Web of Science and compared the duration for which the pigs were significantly sensitized as well as the intensity of mechanical sensitization. We searched models within the specific field of pain and adjacent fields in which pain induction or assessment is relevant, such as pig production. Second, we compared assessment methodologies in surrogate pain models in humans and pigs to identify areas of overlap and possible improvement. Based on the literature search, 23 types of porcine pain models were identified; 13 of which could be compared quantitatively. The induced sensitization lasted from hours to months and intensities ranged from insignificant to the maximum attainable. We also found a near to complete overlap of assessment methodologies between human and pig models within the area of peripheral neurophysiology, which allows for direct comparison of results obtained in the two species. In spite of this overlap, further development of pain assessment methodologies is still needed. We suggest that central nervous system electrophysiology, such as electroencephalography, electrocorticography or intracortical recordings, may pave the way for future objective pain assessment. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=99011 |
in LabAnimal > Vol. 21 N°12 (December 2021) . - p. 8-24
[article] A systematic review of porcine models in translational pain research [texte imprimé] / Suzan Meijs ; Martin Schmelz ; Sigal Meilin ; Winnie Jensen . - 2021 . - p. 8-24. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in LabAnimal > Vol. 21 N°12 (December 2021) . - p. 8-24
Mots-clés : |
Animals Models, Animal Pain / veterinary Pain Measurement Proteomics Swine Translational Research, Biomedical Systematic Review |
Résumé : |
Translating basic pain research from rodents to humans has proven to be a challenging task. Efforts have been made to develop preclinical large animal models of pain, such as the pig. However, no consistent overview and comparison of pig models of pain are currently available. Therefore, in this review, our primary aim was to identify the available pig models in pain research and compare these models in terms of intensity and duration. First, we systematically searched Proquest, Scopus and Web of Science and compared the duration for which the pigs were significantly sensitized as well as the intensity of mechanical sensitization. We searched models within the specific field of pain and adjacent fields in which pain induction or assessment is relevant, such as pig production. Second, we compared assessment methodologies in surrogate pain models in humans and pigs to identify areas of overlap and possible improvement. Based on the literature search, 23 types of porcine pain models were identified; 13 of which could be compared quantitatively. The induced sensitization lasted from hours to months and intensities ranged from insignificant to the maximum attainable. We also found a near to complete overlap of assessment methodologies between human and pig models within the area of peripheral neurophysiology, which allows for direct comparison of results obtained in the two species. In spite of this overlap, further development of pain assessment methodologies is still needed. We suggest that central nervous system electrophysiology, such as electroencephalography, electrocorticography or intracortical recordings, may pave the way for future objective pain assessment. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=99011 |
|