Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Attention,
Votre centre de documentation sera fermé ce lundi 26 août.
Également, ce mercredi 28 août il sera fermé de 12 à 13h.
Enfin, ce jeudi 29 août il ouvrira à 14h45.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Attention,
Votre centre de documentation sera fermé ce lundi 26 août.
Également, ce mercredi 28 août il sera fermé de 12 à 13h.
Enfin, ce jeudi 29 août il ouvrira à 14h45.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Elke Van Eynde |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
![](./images/expand_all.gif)
![](./images/collapse_all.gif)
![Tris disponibles](./images/orderby_az.gif)
Functional outcome of ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition after failed first carpometacarpal joint prosthesis / Lyne Anthonissen in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, Vol.87/1 (Mars 2021)
[article]
Titre : Functional outcome of ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition after failed first carpometacarpal joint prosthesis Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Lyne Anthonissen ; Elke Van Eynde ; Maarten Van Nuffel ; Luc De Smet Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : p. 137-142 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.52628/87.1.17 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : thumb LRTI first carpometacarpal joint prosthesis revision strength loss Résumé : The purpose is to determine if ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition (LRTI) is a recommendable salvage option for failed total joint prosthesis of the first carpometacarpal joint.
Twenty-two patients in our database met the in- clusion criteria for this retrospective study, with at least 6 months follow-up. Fourteen participated and were invited for a clinical examination and asked to fill out two questionnaires. They were evaluated for pain (VAS), impairment (NHS), disability (Quick DASH), opposition (Kapandji test) and grip strength (hydraulic dynamometer). Results of the questionnaires were compared to a cohort study of primary LRTI’s. Kapandji test and grip strength were compared to the contralateral side.
Compared to primary LRTI’s, revision surgery showed mild deterioration of impairment and disability. The average VAS score was 2.9 out of 10. Twelve patients mentioned a sense of strength loss, which could be quantified with the dynamometer : a mean of 15.1 kg (operated thumb) versus 20.5 kg (contralateral). There was a relatively small decline of opposition with Kapandji 8.6 versus 9.9. The overall satisfaction was good for 8 patients, fair for 3 and poor for the remaining 3 (mainly based on strength loss). One patient needed a second revision.
Failed first carpometacarpal joint replacement can be salvaged by ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition, providing an acceptable functional outcome in 79% of cases studied. However, compared to the functional outcome of primary LRTI’s, mild aggravation of impairment and disability should be taken into account.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96597
in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol.87/1 (Mars 2021) . - p. 137-142[article] Functional outcome of ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition after failed first carpometacarpal joint prosthesis [texte imprimé] / Lyne Anthonissen ; Elke Van Eynde ; Maarten Van Nuffel ; Luc De Smet . - 2021 . - p. 137-142.
https://doi.org/10.52628/87.1.17
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol.87/1 (Mars 2021) . - p. 137-142
Mots-clés : thumb LRTI first carpometacarpal joint prosthesis revision strength loss Résumé : The purpose is to determine if ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition (LRTI) is a recommendable salvage option for failed total joint prosthesis of the first carpometacarpal joint.
Twenty-two patients in our database met the in- clusion criteria for this retrospective study, with at least 6 months follow-up. Fourteen participated and were invited for a clinical examination and asked to fill out two questionnaires. They were evaluated for pain (VAS), impairment (NHS), disability (Quick DASH), opposition (Kapandji test) and grip strength (hydraulic dynamometer). Results of the questionnaires were compared to a cohort study of primary LRTI’s. Kapandji test and grip strength were compared to the contralateral side.
Compared to primary LRTI’s, revision surgery showed mild deterioration of impairment and disability. The average VAS score was 2.9 out of 10. Twelve patients mentioned a sense of strength loss, which could be quantified with the dynamometer : a mean of 15.1 kg (operated thumb) versus 20.5 kg (contralateral). There was a relatively small decline of opposition with Kapandji 8.6 versus 9.9. The overall satisfaction was good for 8 patients, fair for 3 and poor for the remaining 3 (mainly based on strength loss). One patient needed a second revision.
Failed first carpometacarpal joint replacement can be salvaged by ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition, providing an acceptable functional outcome in 79% of cases studied. However, compared to the functional outcome of primary LRTI’s, mild aggravation of impairment and disability should be taken into account.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96597 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtHospital accreditation and patient care, a dilemma? / Yves Fortems in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, Vol.87/2 (Juin 2021)
[article]
Titre : Hospital accreditation and patient care, a dilemma? Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Yves Fortems ; Elke Van Eynde ; Charlotte Fortems Année de publication : 2021 Article en page(s) : p. 205-210 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.52628/87.2.01 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Hospital accreditation patient knowledge patient perspective quality of care hospital choice Résumé : Despite the massive financial and human efforts of hospitals in the Flemish part of Belgium to increase quality through the path of external accreditation, so far this has not convinced the end user, in casu the patient. In this study of 307 hospital patients we conclude that the knowledge about accreditation is very limited to none existent (2%) in a sample of Belgian patients not working in medical practice and that patients do not choose their hospital care in accordance to the accreditation status of the hospital. We remain convinced that improving quality is a continuous concern for medical professionals and hospital management. However, we believe that patients, medical professionals and hospital managers might define quality care in a somewhat different way and we question the methodology of imposing a 2 vast amount of strict protocols as a way to improve quality in patient care. There is no conclusive evidence to support that these uniformly imposed “quality programs” improve patient care, except on safety issues. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96616
in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol.87/2 (Juin 2021) . - p. 205-210[article] Hospital accreditation and patient care, a dilemma? [texte imprimé] / Yves Fortems ; Elke Van Eynde ; Charlotte Fortems . - 2021 . - p. 205-210.
https://doi.org/10.52628/87.2.01
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol.87/2 (Juin 2021) . - p. 205-210
Mots-clés : Hospital accreditation patient knowledge patient perspective quality of care hospital choice Résumé : Despite the massive financial and human efforts of hospitals in the Flemish part of Belgium to increase quality through the path of external accreditation, so far this has not convinced the end user, in casu the patient. In this study of 307 hospital patients we conclude that the knowledge about accreditation is very limited to none existent (2%) in a sample of Belgian patients not working in medical practice and that patients do not choose their hospital care in accordance to the accreditation status of the hospital. We remain convinced that improving quality is a continuous concern for medical professionals and hospital management. However, we believe that patients, medical professionals and hospital managers might define quality care in a somewhat different way and we question the methodology of imposing a 2 vast amount of strict protocols as a way to improve quality in patient care. There is no conclusive evidence to support that these uniformly imposed “quality programs” improve patient care, except on safety issues. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96616 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt