Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Teng Cheng Khoo |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Outcomes for older adults in inpatient specialist neurorehabilitation / Teng Cheng Khoo in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 63, n°4 (Juillet 2020)
[article]
Titre : Outcomes for older adults in inpatient specialist neurorehabilitation Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Teng Cheng Khoo ; Alasdair FitzGerald ; Elizabeth MacDonald ; Lloyd Bradley Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : p. 340-343 Note générale : doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.05.001 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Neurorehabilitation Rehabilitation Rehabilitation potential Older adults UK FIM + FAM Résumé : Background
Inpatient specialist neurorehabilitation in the United Kingdom is based on providing a service to “working-age” adults (<65 years), with little evidence for outcomes for older adults involved with these services.
Objective
The aim of this study is to determine any difference in outcome after inpatient neurorehabilitation between younger and older adults assessed as having rehabilitation potential.
Methods
A two-centre retrospective review was performed comparing patients aged < 65 and ≥ 65 years by diagnostic group in terms of length of stay, changes in UK Functional Independence Measure + Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM + FAM) scores and discharge destination.
Results
Six hundred and sixteen patients (32% ≥ 65 years) were included. The 2 age groups did not differ in length of stay (median difference 7 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] −2 to 15, P = 0.112), but both UK FIM + FAM change and efficiency were higher for the older than younger group (median difference 7, 95% CI 2–13, P = 0.006 and 0.10, 0.01–0.19, P = 0.031 respectively). Older age was associated with discharge to long-term care (6% < 65 years; 11% ≥ 65 years, x2 = 4.10, P = 0.043). Results and trends were similar in patients with acquired brain injury (n = 429), spinal cord injury (n = 59) and peripheral neuropathy (n = 34) but not progressive neurological disorders (n = 70).
Conclusion
Older adults considered to have rehabilitation potential may have greater functional gains from inpatient specialist inpatient rehabilitation than younger adults. Age alone should not exclude admission to inpatient specialist neurorehabilitation.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=90880
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 63, n°4 (Juillet 2020) . - p. 340-343[article] Outcomes for older adults in inpatient specialist neurorehabilitation [texte imprimé] / Teng Cheng Khoo ; Alasdair FitzGerald ; Elizabeth MacDonald ; Lloyd Bradley . - 2020 . - p. 340-343.
doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.05.001
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 63, n°4 (Juillet 2020) . - p. 340-343
Mots-clés : Neurorehabilitation Rehabilitation Rehabilitation potential Older adults UK FIM + FAM Résumé : Background
Inpatient specialist neurorehabilitation in the United Kingdom is based on providing a service to “working-age” adults (<65 years), with little evidence for outcomes for older adults involved with these services.
Objective
The aim of this study is to determine any difference in outcome after inpatient neurorehabilitation between younger and older adults assessed as having rehabilitation potential.
Methods
A two-centre retrospective review was performed comparing patients aged < 65 and ≥ 65 years by diagnostic group in terms of length of stay, changes in UK Functional Independence Measure + Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM + FAM) scores and discharge destination.
Results
Six hundred and sixteen patients (32% ≥ 65 years) were included. The 2 age groups did not differ in length of stay (median difference 7 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] −2 to 15, P = 0.112), but both UK FIM + FAM change and efficiency were higher for the older than younger group (median difference 7, 95% CI 2–13, P = 0.006 and 0.10, 0.01–0.19, P = 0.031 respectively). Older age was associated with discharge to long-term care (6% < 65 years; 11% ≥ 65 years, x2 = 4.10, P = 0.043). Results and trends were similar in patients with acquired brain injury (n = 429), spinal cord injury (n = 59) and peripheral neuropathy (n = 34) but not progressive neurological disorders (n = 70).
Conclusion
Older adults considered to have rehabilitation potential may have greater functional gains from inpatient specialist inpatient rehabilitation than younger adults. Age alone should not exclude admission to inpatient specialist neurorehabilitation.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=90880 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt