Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Votre centre de documentation fermera de 12h30 à 13h ce vendredi 28 juin et fermera à 14h30.
Dès ce lundi 1er juillet jusqu'au mercredi 10 juillet l'horaire du centre de documentation sera adapté :
Lundi 1er juillet : de 8h à 12h et de 12h30 à 16h
Mardi 2 juillet : de 8h à 12h15
Mercredi 3 juillet : de 9h à 12h et de 12h30 à 15h15
Jeudi 4 juillet : de 8h à 12h30 et de 13h à 18h30
Lundi 8 juillet : de 8h à 12h et de 12h30 à 16h
Mardi 9 juillet : de 8h à 12h15
Mercredi 10 juillet : de 9h à 11h
Réouverture dès ce lundi 19 août.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Votre centre de documentation fermera de 12h30 à 13h ce vendredi 28 juin et fermera à 14h30.
Dès ce lundi 1er juillet jusqu'au mercredi 10 juillet l'horaire du centre de documentation sera adapté :
Lundi 1er juillet : de 8h à 12h et de 12h30 à 16h
Mardi 2 juillet : de 8h à 12h15
Mercredi 3 juillet : de 9h à 12h et de 12h30 à 15h15
Jeudi 4 juillet : de 8h à 12h30 et de 13h à 18h30
Lundi 8 juillet : de 8h à 12h et de 12h30 à 16h
Mardi 9 juillet : de 8h à 12h15
Mercredi 10 juillet : de 9h à 11h
Réouverture dès ce lundi 19 août.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Johanna Jonsdottir |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
![](./images/expand_all.gif)
![](./images/collapse_all.gif)
![Tris disponibles](./images/orderby_az.gif)
Factors influencing balance improvement in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: A pragmatic multicentric trial / Davide Cattaneo in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 63, n°2 (Mars 2020)
[article]
Titre : Factors influencing balance improvement in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: A pragmatic multicentric trial Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Davide Cattaneo ; Susan Coote ; Kamila Rasova ; Elisa Gervasoni ; Elisabetta Groppo ; Terezie Prokopiusova ; Jitka Reznickova ; Angelo Montesano ; Johanna Jonsdottir Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : p. 93-98 Note générale : doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.05.007 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Multiple sclerosis Rehabilitation Outcome Balance improvement Résumé : Objectives
Treatment for progressive multiple sclerosis (pMS) is a key area of research. To date, whether MS type and the rehabilitation setting are associated with worse or better response to rehabilitation is unclear. We aimed to understand the association between balance and MS type, in/outpatient treatment and specificity of the intervention.
Methods
We assessed 150 people with MS before and after in/outpatient rehabilitation. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was used to discriminate between responders (≥ +3-point improvement in BBS score; a clinically meaningful improvement) and non-responders to specific or non-specific balance rehabilitation. Factors associated with balance were analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Balance improved after rehabilitation: median (quartile 1 [Q1]–Q3) BBS score pre- and post-rehabilitation of 49 (45–53) and 52 (47–55) (P < 0.001). Univariate logistic analysis revealed a clinically meaningful improvement in balance associated with pMS (OR 2.21 [95% CI 1.09–4.05]), inpatient therapy (0.41 [0.19–0.84]), using a walking aid (1.68 [1.06–2.69]), and low baseline BBS score (0.86 [0.81–0.92]). On multivariable analysis, probability of improvement was similar for participants with pMS and the relapsing-remitting form but was associated with low baseline BBS score and specific treatment (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.74–0.89] and 5.66 [1.79–21.5]).
Conclusion
A clinically meaningful improvement in balance was more likely when MS individuals with moderate to high disability had specific exercises targeting balance, but MS type did not influence the outcome.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=90777
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 63, n°2 (Mars 2020) . - p. 93-98[article] Factors influencing balance improvement in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: A pragmatic multicentric trial [texte imprimé] / Davide Cattaneo ; Susan Coote ; Kamila Rasova ; Elisa Gervasoni ; Elisabetta Groppo ; Terezie Prokopiusova ; Jitka Reznickova ; Angelo Montesano ; Johanna Jonsdottir . - 2020 . - p. 93-98.
doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.05.007
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 63, n°2 (Mars 2020) . - p. 93-98
Mots-clés : Multiple sclerosis Rehabilitation Outcome Balance improvement Résumé : Objectives
Treatment for progressive multiple sclerosis (pMS) is a key area of research. To date, whether MS type and the rehabilitation setting are associated with worse or better response to rehabilitation is unclear. We aimed to understand the association between balance and MS type, in/outpatient treatment and specificity of the intervention.
Methods
We assessed 150 people with MS before and after in/outpatient rehabilitation. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was used to discriminate between responders (≥ +3-point improvement in BBS score; a clinically meaningful improvement) and non-responders to specific or non-specific balance rehabilitation. Factors associated with balance were analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Balance improved after rehabilitation: median (quartile 1 [Q1]–Q3) BBS score pre- and post-rehabilitation of 49 (45–53) and 52 (47–55) (P < 0.001). Univariate logistic analysis revealed a clinically meaningful improvement in balance associated with pMS (OR 2.21 [95% CI 1.09–4.05]), inpatient therapy (0.41 [0.19–0.84]), using a walking aid (1.68 [1.06–2.69]), and low baseline BBS score (0.86 [0.81–0.92]). On multivariable analysis, probability of improvement was similar for participants with pMS and the relapsing-remitting form but was associated with low baseline BBS score and specific treatment (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.74–0.89] and 5.66 [1.79–21.5]).
Conclusion
A clinically meaningful improvement in balance was more likely when MS individuals with moderate to high disability had specific exercises targeting balance, but MS type did not influence the outcome.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=90777 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt