Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Michael Loughlin |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
An empirical investigation into the role of values in occupational therapy decision-making / Yvonne Thomas in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 82 Issue 6 (Juin 2019)
[article]
Titre : An empirical investigation into the role of values in occupational therapy decision-making Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Yvonne Thomas ; David Seedhouse ; Vanessa Peutherer ; Michael Loughlin Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 357-366 Note générale : doi.org/10.1177/0308022619829722 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Healthcare values ethics education occupational therapy Résumé : Introduction
The importance of values in occupational therapy is generally agreed; however, there is no consensus about their nature or their influence on practice. It is widely assumed that occupational therapists hold and act on a body of shared values, yet there is a lack of evidence to support this.
Method
The research tested the hypothesis that occupational therapists’ responses to ethically challenging situations would reveal common values specific to the occupational therapy profession. A total of 156 occupational therapists were asked to decide what should be done in five common-place yet ethically complex situations, presented as scenarios for debate.
Results
The results show that while most occupational therapists share very general values, they frequently disagree about what to do in practice situations, often justifying their choices with different and sometimes conflicting specific values. In some cases, the same respondents espouse contradictory values in similar situations.
Conclusion
The extensive literature about decision-making – together with the study’s results – confirm that when occupational therapists make decisions, they draw on multiple factors, consciously and unconsciously. These factors vary between individuals. Value judgements are one part only of a complex process which includes personal experience, intuition, social influences, culture, psychological influences and relationships with both colleagues and clients.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84443
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 82 Issue 6 (Juin 2019) . - p. 357-366[article] An empirical investigation into the role of values in occupational therapy decision-making [texte imprimé] / Yvonne Thomas ; David Seedhouse ; Vanessa Peutherer ; Michael Loughlin . - 2019 . - p. 357-366.
doi.org/10.1177/0308022619829722
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 82 Issue 6 (Juin 2019) . - p. 357-366
Mots-clés : Healthcare values ethics education occupational therapy Résumé : Introduction
The importance of values in occupational therapy is generally agreed; however, there is no consensus about their nature or their influence on practice. It is widely assumed that occupational therapists hold and act on a body of shared values, yet there is a lack of evidence to support this.
Method
The research tested the hypothesis that occupational therapists’ responses to ethically challenging situations would reveal common values specific to the occupational therapy profession. A total of 156 occupational therapists were asked to decide what should be done in five common-place yet ethically complex situations, presented as scenarios for debate.
Results
The results show that while most occupational therapists share very general values, they frequently disagree about what to do in practice situations, often justifying their choices with different and sometimes conflicting specific values. In some cases, the same respondents espouse contradictory values in similar situations.
Conclusion
The extensive literature about decision-making – together with the study’s results – confirm that when occupational therapists make decisions, they draw on multiple factors, consciously and unconsciously. These factors vary between individuals. Value judgements are one part only of a complex process which includes personal experience, intuition, social influences, culture, psychological influences and relationships with both colleagues and clients.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84443 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt