Changes in care pathways and follow-up of individuals with severe traumatic brain injury between 1998 and 2015 : Comparison of 2 cohorts / Odile Kozlowski-Moreau in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 63, n°3 (Mai-Juin 2020)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 63, n°3 (Mai-Juin 2020) . - p. 255-257 Titre : Changes in care pathways and follow-up of individuals with severe traumatic brain injury between 1998 and 2015 : Comparison of 2 cohorts Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Odile Kozlowski-Moreau ; Marie Blanc ; Walter Daveluy ; Xavier Molders ; Etienne Allart Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : p. 255-257 Note générale : doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.10.003 Langues : Anglais (eng) Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=90805 [article] Changes in care pathways and follow-up of individuals with severe traumatic brain injury between 1998 and 2015 : Comparison of 2 cohorts [texte imprimé] / Odile Kozlowski-Moreau ; Marie Blanc ; Walter Daveluy ; Xavier Molders ; Etienne Allart . - 2020 . - p. 255-257. doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.10.003 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 63, n°3 (Mai-Juin 2020) . - p. 255-257 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=90805

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

French clinical guidelines for peripheral motor nerve blocks in a PRM setting / Alain P. Yelnik in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°4 (Juillet 2019)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°4 (Juillet 2019) . - p. 252-264 Titre : French clinical guidelines for peripheral motor nerve blocks in a PRM setting Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Alain P. Yelnik ; Claire Hentzen ; Philippe Cuvillon ; Etienne Allart ; Isabelle V. Bonan ; François C. Boyer ; Flavia Coroian ; Éric Viel (1931-2008) Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 252-264 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.06.001 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Motor nerve block  Physical and rehabilitation medicine  Spasticity  Rehabilitation Résumé : Introduction Motor nerve blocks with anesthetic drug for local anesthesia are commonly used in physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM), especially in the field of spasticity. Guidelines in this context are currently lacking. Method Eighteen experts selected on the basis of their recognized experience by the scientific committees of the French PRM (SOFMER) and Anesthesia and Intensive care (SFAR) societies were invited to work and propose guidelines for the use of loco-regional anesthetic drug for motor nerve blocks in PRM setting. Eight issues were addressed: which neural blocks for which indications; drugs and contraindications; medical survey and attitude in case of adverse event; injection and guidance material; patient preparation and pain relief; efficacy assessment; patient information; education of PRM physiatrists. The Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases for the period 1999 to 2018 were consulted and 355 papers analyzed. The drafts were commented then approved by the whole group using electronic vote, before final approval by scientific committee of each society. Results No scientific evidence emerged from the literature. Thus, these guidelines are mainly based on the opinion of the expert panel. Guidelines for each issue are reported with the main points of arguments. The main question deals with the recommendation about doses for each drug: for lidocaine – up to 2 mg/kg – “check contraindications, emergency truck available, no need of previous anesthetic consultation nor presence of anesthetic physician”; for ropivacaine – up to 1.5 mg/kg, with a maximum of 100 mg – the same but after intravenous line. Beyond these doses, SFAR guidelines have to be applied with the need of anesthetic physician. Conclusion These are the first organizational guidelines devoted to increase the security of motor nerve block use in PRM settings. En ligne : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065719300739 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84130 [article] French clinical guidelines for peripheral motor nerve blocks in a PRM setting [texte imprimé] / Alain P. Yelnik ; Claire Hentzen ; Philippe Cuvillon ; Etienne Allart ; Isabelle V. Bonan ; François C. Boyer ; Flavia Coroian ; Éric Viel (1931-2008) . - 2019 . - p. 252-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.06.001 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°4 (Juillet 2019) . - p. 252-264 Mots-clés : Motor nerve block  Physical and rehabilitation medicine  Spasticity  Rehabilitation Résumé : Introduction Motor nerve blocks with anesthetic drug for local anesthesia are commonly used in physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM), especially in the field of spasticity. Guidelines in this context are currently lacking. Method Eighteen experts selected on the basis of their recognized experience by the scientific committees of the French PRM (SOFMER) and Anesthesia and Intensive care (SFAR) societies were invited to work and propose guidelines for the use of loco-regional anesthetic drug for motor nerve blocks in PRM setting. Eight issues were addressed: which neural blocks for which indications; drugs and contraindications; medical survey and attitude in case of adverse event; injection and guidance material; patient preparation and pain relief; efficacy assessment; patient information; education of PRM physiatrists. The Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases for the period 1999 to 2018 were consulted and 355 papers analyzed. The drafts were commented then approved by the whole group using electronic vote, before final approval by scientific committee of each society. Results No scientific evidence emerged from the literature. Thus, these guidelines are mainly based on the opinion of the expert panel. Guidelines for each issue are reported with the main points of arguments. The main question deals with the recommendation about doses for each drug: for lidocaine – up to 2 mg/kg – “check contraindications, emergency truck available, no need of previous anesthetic consultation nor presence of anesthetic physician”; for ropivacaine – up to 1.5 mg/kg, with a maximum of 100 mg – the same but after intravenous line. Beyond these doses, SFAR guidelines have to be applied with the need of anesthetic physician. Conclusion These are the first organizational guidelines devoted to increase the security of motor nerve block use in PRM settings. En ligne : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065719300739 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84130

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)