Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Shubha Gundmi |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Exercise and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis / A. Sampath Kumar in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°2 (Mars 2019)
[article]
Titre : Exercise and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : A. Sampath Kumar ; Arun G. Maiya ; B.A. Shastry ; K. Vaishali ; N. Ravishankar ; Animesh Hazari ; Shubha Gundmi ; Radhika Jadhav Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 98-103 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.11.001 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Insulin resistance Homa-IR Fasting insulin Glycated hemoglobin Type 2 diabetes mellitus Aerobic exercise Resistance exercise Résumé : Background
Insulin resistance is a determining factor in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Exercise is known to improve insulin resistance, but a systematic review of the literature is lacking.
Objective
This systematic review and meta-analysis focused on identifying evidence for the effectiveness of a structured exercise intervention program for insulin resistance in T2DM.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, CINHAL, Scopus and Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for reports of studies on fasting insulin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (Homa-IR), fasting blood sugar, glycated hemoglobin and body mass index in patients with T2DM and healthy controls that were published between 1990 and 2017. Data are reported as the standardized mean difference or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Among 2242 records retrieved, only 11 full-text articles were available for meta-analysis. Data for 846 participants were analyzed, 440 in the intervention group, and 406 in the control group. The mean difference for fasting insulin level was −1.64 (95% CI; −3.38 to 0.10), Homa-Ir 0.14 (−1.48 to 1.76), fasting blood sugar −5.12 (−7.78 to −2.45), hemoglobin A1c 0.63 (−0.82 to 2.08) and body mass index −0.36 (−1.51 to 0.79).
Conclusion
The evidence highlights the effectiveness of a structured exercise intervention program for insulin resistance in T2DM with a moderate level 2 of evidence.En ligne : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065718314830 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84104
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°2 (Mars 2019) . - p. 98-103[article] Exercise and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis [texte imprimé] / A. Sampath Kumar ; Arun G. Maiya ; B.A. Shastry ; K. Vaishali ; N. Ravishankar ; Animesh Hazari ; Shubha Gundmi ; Radhika Jadhav . - 2019 . - p. 98-103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.11.001
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°2 (Mars 2019) . - p. 98-103
Mots-clés : Insulin resistance Homa-IR Fasting insulin Glycated hemoglobin Type 2 diabetes mellitus Aerobic exercise Resistance exercise Résumé : Background
Insulin resistance is a determining factor in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Exercise is known to improve insulin resistance, but a systematic review of the literature is lacking.
Objective
This systematic review and meta-analysis focused on identifying evidence for the effectiveness of a structured exercise intervention program for insulin resistance in T2DM.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, CINHAL, Scopus and Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for reports of studies on fasting insulin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (Homa-IR), fasting blood sugar, glycated hemoglobin and body mass index in patients with T2DM and healthy controls that were published between 1990 and 2017. Data are reported as the standardized mean difference or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Among 2242 records retrieved, only 11 full-text articles were available for meta-analysis. Data for 846 participants were analyzed, 440 in the intervention group, and 406 in the control group. The mean difference for fasting insulin level was −1.64 (95% CI; −3.38 to 0.10), Homa-Ir 0.14 (−1.48 to 1.76), fasting blood sugar −5.12 (−7.78 to −2.45), hemoglobin A1c 0.63 (−0.82 to 2.08) and body mass index −0.36 (−1.51 to 0.79).
Conclusion
The evidence highlights the effectiveness of a structured exercise intervention program for insulin resistance in T2DM with a moderate level 2 of evidence.En ligne : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065718314830 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84104 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtHand dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Systematic review with meta-analysis / Shubha Gundmi in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 61, n°2 (Mars 2018)
[article]
Titre : Hand dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Systematic review with meta-analysis Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Shubha Gundmi ; Arun G. Maiya ; Anil K. Bhat ; N. Ravishankar ; Manjunatha H. Hande ; K.V. Rajagopal Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 99-104 Note générale : Doi : 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.12.006 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Type 2 diabetes mellitus Hand Dysfunction Strength, Dexterity Résumé : Background
People with type 2 diabetes mellitus frequently show complications in feet and hands. However, the literature has mostly focused on foot complications. The disease can affect the strength and dexterity of the hands, thereby reducing function.
Objectives
This systematic review and meta-analysis focused on identifying the existing evidence on how type 2 diabetes mellitus affects hand strength, dexterity and function.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, CINHAL, Scopus and Web of Science, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials for reports of studies of grip and pinch strength as well as hand dexterity and function evaluated by questionnaires comparing patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy controls that were published between 1990 and 2017. Data are reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Among 2077 records retrieved, only 7 full-text articles were available for meta-analysis. For both the dominant and non-dominant hand, type 2 diabetes mellitus negatively affected grip strength (SMD: −1.03; 95% CI: −2.24 to 0.18 and −1.37, −3.07 to 0.33) and pinch strength (−1.09, −2.56 to 0.38 and −1.12, −2.73 to 0.49), although not significantly. Dexterity of the dominant hand did not differ between diabetes and control groups but was poorer for the non-dominant hand, although not significantly. Hand function was worse for diabetes than control groups in 2 studies (MD: −8.7; 95% CI: −16.88 to −1.52 and 4.69, 2.03 to 7.35).
Conclusion
This systematic review with meta-analysis suggested reduced hand function, specifically grip and pinch strength, for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus versus healthy controls. However, the sample size for all studies was low. Hence, we need studies with adequate sample size and randomized controlled trials to provide statistically significant results.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80453
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 61, n°2 (Mars 2018) . - p. 99-104[article] Hand dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Systematic review with meta-analysis [texte imprimé] / Shubha Gundmi ; Arun G. Maiya ; Anil K. Bhat ; N. Ravishankar ; Manjunatha H. Hande ; K.V. Rajagopal . - 2018 . - p. 99-104.
Doi : 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.12.006
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 61, n°2 (Mars 2018) . - p. 99-104
Mots-clés : Type 2 diabetes mellitus Hand Dysfunction Strength, Dexterity Résumé : Background
People with type 2 diabetes mellitus frequently show complications in feet and hands. However, the literature has mostly focused on foot complications. The disease can affect the strength and dexterity of the hands, thereby reducing function.
Objectives
This systematic review and meta-analysis focused on identifying the existing evidence on how type 2 diabetes mellitus affects hand strength, dexterity and function.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, CINHAL, Scopus and Web of Science, and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials for reports of studies of grip and pinch strength as well as hand dexterity and function evaluated by questionnaires comparing patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy controls that were published between 1990 and 2017. Data are reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Among 2077 records retrieved, only 7 full-text articles were available for meta-analysis. For both the dominant and non-dominant hand, type 2 diabetes mellitus negatively affected grip strength (SMD: −1.03; 95% CI: −2.24 to 0.18 and −1.37, −3.07 to 0.33) and pinch strength (−1.09, −2.56 to 0.38 and −1.12, −2.73 to 0.49), although not significantly. Dexterity of the dominant hand did not differ between diabetes and control groups but was poorer for the non-dominant hand, although not significantly. Hand function was worse for diabetes than control groups in 2 studies (MD: −8.7; 95% CI: −16.88 to −1.52 and 4.69, 2.03 to 7.35).
Conclusion
This systematic review with meta-analysis suggested reduced hand function, specifically grip and pinch strength, for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus versus healthy controls. However, the sample size for all studies was low. Hence, we need studies with adequate sample size and randomized controlled trials to provide statistically significant results.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80453 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt