Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Attention,
Votre centre de documentation sera fermé ce lundi 26 août.
Également, ce mercredi 28 août il sera fermé de 12 à 13h.
Enfin, ce jeudi 29 août il ouvrira à 14h45.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Attention,
Votre centre de documentation sera fermé ce lundi 26 août.
Également, ce mercredi 28 août il sera fermé de 12 à 13h.
Enfin, ce jeudi 29 août il ouvrira à 14h45.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Ruth H. Parry |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
![](./images/expand_all.gif)
![](./images/collapse_all.gif)
![Tris disponibles](./images/orderby_az.gif)
Content and acceptability of an Occupational Therapy intervention in HomEcare Re-ablement Services (OTHERS) / Phillip J. Whitehead in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol.81 Issue 9 (Septembre 2018)
[article]
Titre : Content and acceptability of an Occupational Therapy intervention in HomEcare Re-ablement Services (OTHERS) Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Phillip J. Whitehead ; Avril Drummond ; Ruth H. Parry ; Marion F. Walker Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 535-542 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Re-ablement homecare ADL acceptability of intervention Résumé : Introduction
Despite clear compatibilities between the tenets of occupational therapy and re-ablement, there is limited research on occupational therapy in homecare reablement services. This article describes an occupational therapy intervention that was delivered as part of a feasibility randomised controlled trial (Occupational Therapy intervention in HomEcare Re-ablement Services), and evaluates whether the intervention was acceptable to participants.
Method
There were three phases: (1) a bespoke pro forma was completed, recording the activities undertaken after each therapy visit; (2) an acceptability questionnaire was sent to every intervention participant and (3) semi-structured interviews were completed with key informants who received the intervention.
Results
The principal activities undertaken were assessment, case management, goal-setting, advice and support, and practising activities in relation to bathing/showering or kitchen activities. Participants particularly valued the advice and support provided. However, there were difficulties due to fluctuations in circumstances and with activities of daily living outside the home within the 6 week timescale.
Conclusion
An intervention focusing on activities of daily living within the home was acceptable for participants and consistent with their goals; however, they also had goals beyond personal activities of daily living and the timescale of the re-ablement episode. Further research should focus on extended activities of daily living, beyond this time-limited period.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80203
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.81 Issue 9 (Septembre 2018) . - p. 535-542[article] Content and acceptability of an Occupational Therapy intervention in HomEcare Re-ablement Services (OTHERS) [texte imprimé] / Phillip J. Whitehead ; Avril Drummond ; Ruth H. Parry ; Marion F. Walker . - 2018 . - p. 535-542.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.81 Issue 9 (Septembre 2018) . - p. 535-542
Mots-clés : Re-ablement homecare ADL acceptability of intervention Résumé : Introduction
Despite clear compatibilities between the tenets of occupational therapy and re-ablement, there is limited research on occupational therapy in homecare reablement services. This article describes an occupational therapy intervention that was delivered as part of a feasibility randomised controlled trial (Occupational Therapy intervention in HomEcare Re-ablement Services), and evaluates whether the intervention was acceptable to participants.
Method
There were three phases: (1) a bespoke pro forma was completed, recording the activities undertaken after each therapy visit; (2) an acceptability questionnaire was sent to every intervention participant and (3) semi-structured interviews were completed with key informants who received the intervention.
Results
The principal activities undertaken were assessment, case management, goal-setting, advice and support, and practising activities in relation to bathing/showering or kitchen activities. Participants particularly valued the advice and support provided. However, there were difficulties due to fluctuations in circumstances and with activities of daily living outside the home within the 6 week timescale.
Conclusion
An intervention focusing on activities of daily living within the home was acceptable for participants and consistent with their goals; however, they also had goals beyond personal activities of daily living and the timescale of the re-ablement episode. Further research should focus on extended activities of daily living, beyond this time-limited period.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80203 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt