Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Ingalill Modig-Arding |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Driving after an injury or disease affecting the brain: an analysis of clinical data / Kersti Samuelsson in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol.81 Issue 7 (Juillet 2018)
[article]
Titre : Driving after an injury or disease affecting the brain: an analysis of clinical data Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Kersti Samuelsson ; Ingalill Modig-Arding ; Ewa Wressle Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 376-383 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Acquired brain injury cognition dementia Résumé : Introduction
Traffic safety may be affected if a licence holder has experienced illness or injury that may have an impact on cognition. Occupational therapists are involved in assessing cognitive functions that might affect a patient’s ability to drive a car using different evaluation tools in different countries and settings. The aim of this study was to look at the predictive value of some of the assessment tools available to occupational therapists for making judgements about resuming driving after cognitive impairment due to brain trauma or disease.
Method
A retrospective study based on clinical data from 204 patients referred to a specialist department for recommendations on ability to drive after brain injury or disease. All patients underwent three assessments: stroke drivers screening assessment, useful field of view and simulated driving skill. In addition, an on-road assessment was added in 76% of the sample.
Results
Useful field of view had the highest sensitivity (78%) and, combined with the results from the simulator, the sensitivity was 87%. The specificity for the two methods was 55%.
Conclusion
The results from useful field of view and a simulator test combined best predicted the final recommendation from the multi-professional team discussion on which clients should be recommended not to resume driving.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80158
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.81 Issue 7 (Juillet 2018) . - p. 376-383[article] Driving after an injury or disease affecting the brain: an analysis of clinical data [texte imprimé] / Kersti Samuelsson ; Ingalill Modig-Arding ; Ewa Wressle . - 2018 . - p. 376-383.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.81 Issue 7 (Juillet 2018) . - p. 376-383
Mots-clés : Acquired brain injury cognition dementia Résumé : Introduction
Traffic safety may be affected if a licence holder has experienced illness or injury that may have an impact on cognition. Occupational therapists are involved in assessing cognitive functions that might affect a patient’s ability to drive a car using different evaluation tools in different countries and settings. The aim of this study was to look at the predictive value of some of the assessment tools available to occupational therapists for making judgements about resuming driving after cognitive impairment due to brain trauma or disease.
Method
A retrospective study based on clinical data from 204 patients referred to a specialist department for recommendations on ability to drive after brain injury or disease. All patients underwent three assessments: stroke drivers screening assessment, useful field of view and simulated driving skill. In addition, an on-road assessment was added in 76% of the sample.
Results
Useful field of view had the highest sensitivity (78%) and, combined with the results from the simulator, the sensitivity was 87%. The specificity for the two methods was 55%.
Conclusion
The results from useful field of view and a simulator test combined best predicted the final recommendation from the multi-professional team discussion on which clients should be recommended not to resume driving.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80158 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt