[article] 
inAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 71/3 (2017) . - pp.1-9

Titre :	Do Neglect Assessments Detect Neglect Differently?
Type de document :	texte imprimé
Auteurs :	Emily S. GRATTAN, Auteur ; Michelle WOODBURY, Auteur
Année de publication :	2017
Article en page(s) :	pp.1-9
Langues :	Américain (ame)
Mots-clés :	Diagnostic  Accident vasculaire cérébral  Evaluation
Résumé :	OBJECTIVE. We determined whether various assessment tools detect neglect differently by administering a battery of assessments to people with stroke. METHOD. We conducted a case series study and administered five neglect assessments (paper-and-pencil, functional, virtual reality) to participants poststroke. RESULTS. Twelve participants (6 men, 6 women) with stroke completed the assessment battery, which required approximately 2 hr to administer (over one to two sessions). All participants demonstrated neglect on three or more assessments. Functional assessments and the virtual reality assessment detected neglect more frequently than the paper-and-pencil assessments. Participants performed differently on the paper-and- pencil assessments and functional assessments. CONCLUSION. Because neglect is complex, detection may depend largely on the assessment administered.
Permalink :	./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=49288

[article] Do Neglect Assessments Detect Neglect Differently? [texte imprimé] / Emily S. GRATTAN, Auteur ; Michelle WOODBURY, Auteur . - 2017 . - pp.1-9.
Langues : Américain (ame)
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 71/3 (2017) . - pp.1-9

Mots-clés :	Diagnostic  Accident vasculaire cérébral  Evaluation
Résumé :	OBJECTIVE. We determined whether various assessment tools detect neglect differently by administering a battery of assessments to people with stroke. METHOD. We conducted a case series study and administered five neglect assessments (paper-and-pencil, functional, virtual reality) to participants poststroke. RESULTS. Twelve participants (6 men, 6 women) with stroke completed the assessment battery, which required approximately 2 hr to administer (over one to two sessions). All participants demonstrated neglect on three or more assessments. Functional assessments and the virtual reality assessment detected neglect more frequently than the paper-and-pencil assessments. Participants performed differently on the paper-and- pencil assessments and functional assessments. CONCLUSION. Because neglect is complex, detection may depend largely on the assessment administered.
Permalink :	./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=49288