[article] 
inCanadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(5) (Décembre 2016) . - p. 317-325

Titre :	Interrater reliability of Western University’s on-road assessment
Titre original :	Fiabilité interévaluateurs de l’examen pratique de conduite de la Western University
Type de document :	texte imprimé
Auteurs :	Sherrilene Classen ; Sarah Krasniuk ; Melissa Knott ; [et al...]
Année de publication :	2016
Article en page(s) :	p. 317-325
Langues :	Anglais (eng)
Mots-clés :	aptitude à conduire  conducteurs à risque sur le plan médical  conduite automobile  sclérose en plaques
Résumé :	Background. Little empirical support exists for interrater reliability between evaluators from different backgrounds when assessing on-road outcomes of drivers. Purpose. We quantified interrater reliability of on-road outcomes between a certified driving school instructor (DI) and an occupational therapist and certified driver rehabilitation specialist (CDRS). Method. Both raters used the Global Rating Score (GRS) with two levels (pass, fail), the GRS with four levels (pass, pass with recommendations, fail remediable, fail), and the priority error rating score (PERS; most frequently occurring on-road errors in priority order) to assess 35 drivers (age, M = 48.31 years, SD = 9.76 years; 40% male; 86% with multiple sclerosis). Findings. The DI and occupational therapist CDRS had excellent agreement on the GRS with two levels (κ = .892, p < .0001), GRS with four levels (κ = .952, p < .0001), and the PERS (κ = .847–.902, p < .0001), indicating interrater reliability. Implications. This research contributes to empirical support for the on-road assessment.
Permalink :	./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47801

[article] Interrater reliability of Western University’s on-road assessment = Fiabilité interévaluateurs de l’examen pratique de conduite de la Western University [texte imprimé] / Sherrilene Classen ; Sarah Krasniuk ; Melissa Knott ; [et al...] . - 2016 . - p. 317-325.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(5) (Décembre 2016) . - p. 317-325

Mots-clés :	aptitude à conduire  conducteurs à risque sur le plan médical  conduite automobile  sclérose en plaques
Résumé :	Background. Little empirical support exists for interrater reliability between evaluators from different backgrounds when assessing on-road outcomes of drivers. Purpose. We quantified interrater reliability of on-road outcomes between a certified driving school instructor (DI) and an occupational therapist and certified driver rehabilitation specialist (CDRS). Method. Both raters used the Global Rating Score (GRS) with two levels (pass, fail), the GRS with four levels (pass, pass with recommendations, fail remediable, fail), and the priority error rating score (PERS; most frequently occurring on-road errors in priority order) to assess 35 drivers (age, M = 48.31 years, SD = 9.76 years; 40% male; 86% with multiple sclerosis). Findings. The DI and occupational therapist CDRS had excellent agreement on the GRS with two levels (κ = .892, p < .0001), GRS with four levels (κ = .952, p < .0001), and the PERS (κ = .847–.902, p < .0001), indicating interrater reliability. Implications. This research contributes to empirical support for the on-road assessment.
Permalink :	./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47801