Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Votre centre de documentation fermera de 12h30 à 13h ce vendredi 28 juin et fermera à 14h30.
Dès ce lundi 1er juillet jusqu'au mercredi 10 juillet l'horaire du centre de documentation sera adapté :
Lundi 1er juillet : de 8h à 12h et de 12h30 à 16h
Mardi 2 juillet : de 8h à 12h15
Mercredi 3 juillet : de 9h à 12h et de 12h30 à 15h15
Jeudi 4 juillet : de 8h à 12h30 et de 13h à 18h30
Lundi 8 juillet : de 8h à 12h et de 12h30 à 16h
Mardi 9 juillet : de 8h à 12h15
Réouverture dès ce lundi 19 août.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
[article]
Titre : |
Equipment provision after stroke: A scoping review of the use of personal care and mobility aids in rehabilitation |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Pauline Boland ; William Levack ; Meredith Perry ; Fiona P. Graham |
Année de publication : |
2017 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 73-88 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
dispositifs d'assistance au mouvement accident vasculaire cérébral handicap |
Résumé : |
Introduction
The aim of this scoping review was to examine and synthesise literature on adaptive equipment use for personal care and mobility after stroke.
Method
We searched databases including Medline, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL and Scopus to February 2016. Two authors independently screened 789 titles, identifying 28 studies for inclusion in the review.
Results
Findings were grouped into four themes: (1) stroke-specific impairments and consequences for equipment use and training; (2) meaning of equipment for people with stroke; (3) cost of equipment after stroke; and (4) conflicts between equipment provision and models of stroke rehabilitation.
Conclusion
The wide range of impairments after stroke increases complexity of how people use equipment. Nonetheless, training needs and the relationship between social context, identity and equipment use are increasingly better understood,. The findings highlight a tension between practice that seeks to re-train function by ‘normal’ movement without equipment and restoration of function by using compensation strategies involving use of equipment. However, there is no evidence that compensation strategies impede recovery of physical abilities. High-quality evidence about costs of equipment after stroke, which could inform policy decisions, is urgently needed. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47789 |
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.80 Issue 2 (Février 2017) . - p. 73-88
[article] Equipment provision after stroke: A scoping review of the use of personal care and mobility aids in rehabilitation [texte imprimé] / Pauline Boland ; William Levack ; Meredith Perry ; Fiona P. Graham . - 2017 . - p. 73-88. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.80 Issue 2 (Février 2017) . - p. 73-88
Mots-clés : |
dispositifs d'assistance au mouvement accident vasculaire cérébral handicap |
Résumé : |
Introduction
The aim of this scoping review was to examine and synthesise literature on adaptive equipment use for personal care and mobility after stroke.
Method
We searched databases including Medline, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL and Scopus to February 2016. Two authors independently screened 789 titles, identifying 28 studies for inclusion in the review.
Results
Findings were grouped into four themes: (1) stroke-specific impairments and consequences for equipment use and training; (2) meaning of equipment for people with stroke; (3) cost of equipment after stroke; and (4) conflicts between equipment provision and models of stroke rehabilitation.
Conclusion
The wide range of impairments after stroke increases complexity of how people use equipment. Nonetheless, training needs and the relationship between social context, identity and equipment use are increasingly better understood,. The findings highlight a tension between practice that seeks to re-train function by ‘normal’ movement without equipment and restoration of function by using compensation strategies involving use of equipment. However, there is no evidence that compensation strategies impede recovery of physical abilities. High-quality evidence about costs of equipment after stroke, which could inform policy decisions, is urgently needed. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47789 |
| ![Equipment provision after stroke: A scoping review of the use of personal care and mobility aids in rehabilitation vignette](./getimage.php?url_image=http%3A%2F%2Fimages-eu.amazon.com%2Fimages%2FP%2F%21%21isbn%21%21.08.MZZZZZZZ.jpg¬icecode=&vigurl=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.sagepub.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fupm-binaries%2Fstyles%2Fsage_thumbnail_width_150px%2Ffeed%2F110126_spbjo_83_3_72ppiRGB_150pixw.jpg) |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |