Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Votre centre de documentation fermera de 12h30 à 13h ce vendredi 28 juin et fermera à 14h30.
Dès ce lundi 1er juillet jusqu'au mercredi 10 juillet l'horaire du centre de documentation sera adapté :
Lundi 1er juillet : de 8h à 12h et de 12h30 à 16h
Mardi 2 juillet : de 8h à 12h15
Mercredi 3 juillet : de 9h à 12h et de 12h30 à 15h15
Jeudi 4 juillet : de 8h à 12h30 et de 13h à 18h30
Lundi 8 juillet : de 8h à 12h et de 12h30 à 16h
Mardi 9 juillet : de 8h à 12h15
Réouverture dès ce lundi 19 août.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
[article]
Titre : |
Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool: Clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation |
Titre original : |
Utilité clinique du Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool pour la réadaptation en milieu hospitalier |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Susan W. Darzin ; Christine Imms ; Marilyn Di Stefano ; [et al...] |
Année de publication : |
2016 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 237-248 |
Langues : |
Français (fre) |
Mots-clés : |
activités de la vie quotidienne Classification internationale du fonctionnement du handicap et de la santé (CIF) évaluation des besoins évaluation des résultats (soins de santé) restriction de la participation (CIF) |
Résumé : |
Evidence supports validity of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART), but clinical utility remains unverified.
Purpose.
This study aimed to investigate occupational therapists’ perceptions about the PC-PART’s clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation.
Method.
Using mixed methods, occupational therapists who had used the PC-PART as part of a research study in an inpatient rehabilitation setting completed a questionnaire (n = 9) and participated in a focus group (n = 6) to explore their perspectives about its clinical utility. Quantitative data were summarized and qualitative data analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Findings.
Quantitative data highlighted both positive and negative aspects of the PC-PART’s clinical utility. Five themes emerged from the qualitative data: nature of information gathered; familiarity with the instrument; perceived time and effort; item phrasing, interpretation, and presentation; and external influences on clinical use.
Implications.
The PC-PART was perceived to support gathering of clinically useful information, helpful to intervention and discharge planning. Recommendations for improving some item phrasing, operational definitions, and instructions were identified. Although standardized assessments were valued, use in routine practice was challenging, requiring a knowledge translation strategy. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47096 |
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 237-248
[article] Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool: Clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation = Utilité clinique du Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool pour la réadaptation en milieu hospitalier [texte imprimé] / Susan W. Darzin ; Christine Imms ; Marilyn Di Stefano ; [et al...] . - 2016 . - p. 237-248. Langues : Français ( fre) in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 237-248
Mots-clés : |
activités de la vie quotidienne Classification internationale du fonctionnement du handicap et de la santé (CIF) évaluation des besoins évaluation des résultats (soins de santé) restriction de la participation (CIF) |
Résumé : |
Evidence supports validity of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART), but clinical utility remains unverified.
Purpose.
This study aimed to investigate occupational therapists’ perceptions about the PC-PART’s clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation.
Method.
Using mixed methods, occupational therapists who had used the PC-PART as part of a research study in an inpatient rehabilitation setting completed a questionnaire (n = 9) and participated in a focus group (n = 6) to explore their perspectives about its clinical utility. Quantitative data were summarized and qualitative data analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Findings.
Quantitative data highlighted both positive and negative aspects of the PC-PART’s clinical utility. Five themes emerged from the qualitative data: nature of information gathered; familiarity with the instrument; perceived time and effort; item phrasing, interpretation, and presentation; and external influences on clinical use.
Implications.
The PC-PART was perceived to support gathering of clinically useful information, helpful to intervention and discharge planning. Recommendations for improving some item phrasing, operational definitions, and instructions were identified. Although standardized assessments were valued, use in routine practice was challenging, requiring a knowledge translation strategy. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47096 |
| ![Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool: Clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation vignette](./getimage.php?url_image=http%3A%2F%2Fimages-eu.amazon.com%2Fimages%2FP%2F%21%21isbn%21%21.08.MZZZZZZZ.jpg¬icecode=&vigurl=https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.sagepub.com%2Fna101%2Fhome%2Fliteratum%2Fpublisher%2Fsage%2Fjournals%2Fcontent%2Fcjoc%2F2020%2Fcjoc_87_2%2Fcjoc_87_2%2F20200317%2Fcjoc_87_2.cover.png) |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |