Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Votre centre de documentation fermera de 12h30 à 13h ce vendredi 28 juin et fermera à 14h30.
Dès ce lundi 1er juillet jusqu'au mercredi 10 juillet l'horaire du centre de documentation sera adapté :
Lundi 1er juillet : de 8h à 12h et de 12h30 à 16h
Mardi 2 juillet : de 8h à 12h15
Mercredi 3 juillet : de 9h à 12h et de 12h30 à 15h15
Jeudi 4 juillet : de 8h à 12h30 et de 13h à 18h30
Lundi 8 juillet : de 8h à 12h et de 12h30 à 16h
Mardi 9 juillet : de 8h à 12h15
Réouverture dès ce lundi 19 août.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
[article]
Titre : |
Understanding advocacy in action: A qualitative study |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Shaminder Dhillon ; Seanne Wilkins ; Debra Stewart |
Année de publication : |
2016 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 345-352 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
soutien au patient ergothérapie |
Résumé : |
Introduction Occupational therapists advocate with/for people with disabilities. In the occupational therapy literature, advocacy is mentioned within the context of specific populations or practice settings and thus there is no consistent way of describing advocacy itself. The objective of this article is to describe advocacy in action for occupational therapists who report engaging in advocacy with/for people with disabilities.
Method In this hermeneutic phenomenological study, 13 occupational therapists were interviewed about their advocacy experiences. Data analysis was completed using a Gadamerian-based approach.
Findings Advocacy is complex given that the specific tasks, the third party to whom advocacy is directed and the individual(s) advocating with the therapist vary greatly. Many skills used for advocacy are already part of the therapist’s practice, such as defining the problem, acquiring information, communicating and providing education. In this study, occupational therapists describe advocating as assisting clients who are struggling with access to equipment, services or funding. Also, they advocate by fostering the development of self-advocacy, rather than representing people with disabilities on an ongoing basis.
Conclusion While these findings provide some insights about how advocacy is currently practiced, a detailed framework is needed to further guide therapists through this complex area of practice. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=45771 |
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.79 N°6 (June 2016) . - p. 345-352
[article] Understanding advocacy in action: A qualitative study [texte imprimé] / Shaminder Dhillon ; Seanne Wilkins ; Debra Stewart . - 2016 . - p. 345-352. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.79 N°6 (June 2016) . - p. 345-352
Mots-clés : |
soutien au patient ergothérapie |
Résumé : |
Introduction Occupational therapists advocate with/for people with disabilities. In the occupational therapy literature, advocacy is mentioned within the context of specific populations or practice settings and thus there is no consistent way of describing advocacy itself. The objective of this article is to describe advocacy in action for occupational therapists who report engaging in advocacy with/for people with disabilities.
Method In this hermeneutic phenomenological study, 13 occupational therapists were interviewed about their advocacy experiences. Data analysis was completed using a Gadamerian-based approach.
Findings Advocacy is complex given that the specific tasks, the third party to whom advocacy is directed and the individual(s) advocating with the therapist vary greatly. Many skills used for advocacy are already part of the therapist’s practice, such as defining the problem, acquiring information, communicating and providing education. In this study, occupational therapists describe advocating as assisting clients who are struggling with access to equipment, services or funding. Also, they advocate by fostering the development of self-advocacy, rather than representing people with disabilities on an ongoing basis.
Conclusion While these findings provide some insights about how advocacy is currently practiced, a detailed framework is needed to further guide therapists through this complex area of practice. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=45771 |
| ![Understanding advocacy in action: A qualitative study vignette](./getimage.php?url_image=http%3A%2F%2Fimages-eu.amazon.com%2Fimages%2FP%2F%21%21isbn%21%21.08.MZZZZZZZ.jpg¬icecode=&vigurl=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.sagepub.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fupm-binaries%2Fstyles%2Fsage_thumbnail_width_150px%2Ffeed%2F110126_spbjo_83_3_72ppiRGB_150pixw.jpg) |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |