[article] 
inAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 69/6 (novembre/décembre 2015)

Titre :	Occupational Therapists’ Opinions of Two Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Protocols
Type de document :	texte imprimé
Auteurs :	Emily CHRISTMAN ; Kaitlin MC ALLISTER ; Katie CLAAR ; et al.
Année de publication :	2015
Langues :	Anglais (eng)
Mots-clés :	Ergothérapeute  Protocole soins  Thérapie par contrainte induite  Pédiatrie
Résumé :	OBJECTIVE. We sought to determine occupational therapists’ opinions of two pediatric constraint-induced movement therapy (pCIMT) protocols. METHOD. A total of 272 therapists in pediatric rehabilitation clinics completed an electronic survey to determine their opinions of two published pCIMT protocols. In Protocol A, restraint is worn 24 hr/day on the nonparetic upper extremity (UE), and in-clinic, therapist-supervised practice sessions occur 7 days/wk for 6 hr/day over 3 wk. In Protocol B, restraint is worn 2 hr/day on the nonparetic UE, and in-clinic, therapist-supervised practice sessions occur 1 day/wk for 2 hr/day over 8 wk. RESULTS. The majority of participants reported moderate to high concerns about every facet of Protocol A. Conversely, >50% of participants reported low or no concerns about five of seven facets of Protocol B. CONCLUSION. This study adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that therapists strongly prefer low-duration pCIMT protocols.
Permalink :	./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=41534

[article] Occupational Therapists’ Opinions of Two Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Protocols [texte imprimé] / Emily CHRISTMAN ; Kaitlin MC ALLISTER ; Katie CLAAR ; et al. . - 2015.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 69/6 (novembre/décembre 2015)

Mots-clés :	Ergothérapeute  Protocole soins  Thérapie par contrainte induite  Pédiatrie
Résumé :	OBJECTIVE. We sought to determine occupational therapists’ opinions of two pediatric constraint-induced movement therapy (pCIMT) protocols. METHOD. A total of 272 therapists in pediatric rehabilitation clinics completed an electronic survey to determine their opinions of two published pCIMT protocols. In Protocol A, restraint is worn 24 hr/day on the nonparetic upper extremity (UE), and in-clinic, therapist-supervised practice sessions occur 7 days/wk for 6 hr/day over 3 wk. In Protocol B, restraint is worn 2 hr/day on the nonparetic UE, and in-clinic, therapist-supervised practice sessions occur 1 day/wk for 2 hr/day over 8 wk. RESULTS. The majority of participants reported moderate to high concerns about every facet of Protocol A. Conversely, >50% of participants reported low or no concerns about five of seven facets of Protocol B. CONCLUSION. This study adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that therapists strongly prefer low-duration pCIMT protocols.
Permalink :	./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=41534