Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche

[article]
Titre : |
Enablers and challenges to occupational therapists’ research engagement: A qualitative study |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Laura Di Bona ; Jennifer Wenborn ; Becky Field ; [et al...] |
Année de publication : |
2017 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 642-650 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
ergothérapie recherche démence |
Résumé : |
Introduction
To develop occupational therapy’s evidence base and improve its clinical outcomes, occupational therapists must increase their research involvement. Barriers to research consumption and leadership are well documented, but those relating to delivering research interventions, less so. Yet, interventions need to be researched within practice to demonstrate their clinical effectiveness. This study aims to improve understanding of challenges and enablers experienced by occupational therapists who deliver interventions within research programmes.
Method
Twenty-eight occupational therapists who participated in the Valuing Active Life in Dementia (VALID) research programme reported their experiences in five focus groups. Data were analysed thematically to identify key and subthemes.
Results
Occupational therapists reported that overwhelming paperwork, use of videos, recruitment and introducing a new intervention challenged their research involvement, whereas support, protected time and a positive attitude enabled it. The impact of these challenges and enablers varied between therapists and organisations.
Conclusion
Challenges and enablers to research involvement can be identified but must be addressed within individual and organisational contexts. Multifaceted collective action to minimise challenges and maximise enablers can facilitate clinicians’ involvement in research. Using this approach should enable occupational therapists to increase their research involvement, thus demonstrating the clinical effectiveness of their interventions. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=57793 |
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.80 Issue 11 (Novembre 2017) . - p. 642-650
[article] Enablers and challenges to occupational therapists’ research engagement: A qualitative study [texte imprimé] / Laura Di Bona ; Jennifer Wenborn ; Becky Field ; [et al...] . - 2017 . - p. 642-650. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.80 Issue 11 (Novembre 2017) . - p. 642-650
Mots-clés : |
ergothérapie recherche démence |
Résumé : |
Introduction
To develop occupational therapy’s evidence base and improve its clinical outcomes, occupational therapists must increase their research involvement. Barriers to research consumption and leadership are well documented, but those relating to delivering research interventions, less so. Yet, interventions need to be researched within practice to demonstrate their clinical effectiveness. This study aims to improve understanding of challenges and enablers experienced by occupational therapists who deliver interventions within research programmes.
Method
Twenty-eight occupational therapists who participated in the Valuing Active Life in Dementia (VALID) research programme reported their experiences in five focus groups. Data were analysed thematically to identify key and subthemes.
Results
Occupational therapists reported that overwhelming paperwork, use of videos, recruitment and introducing a new intervention challenged their research involvement, whereas support, protected time and a positive attitude enabled it. The impact of these challenges and enablers varied between therapists and organisations.
Conclusion
Challenges and enablers to research involvement can be identified but must be addressed within individual and organisational contexts. Multifaceted collective action to minimise challenges and maximise enablers can facilitate clinicians’ involvement in research. Using this approach should enable occupational therapists to increase their research involvement, thus demonstrating the clinical effectiveness of their interventions. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=57793 |
|  |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |

[article]
Titre : |
Weaving a clinical academic career: Illuminating the method and pattern to follow |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Laura Di Bona ; Becky Field ; Jennifer Read ; Natalie Jones ; Sally Fowler Davis ; Peter Cudd ; Laura Evans |
Année de publication : |
2019 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 60-64 |
Note générale : |
doi.org/10.1177/0308022618784258 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Research clinical academic professional development research methods and methodology education occupational therapy |
Résumé : |
The benefits of developing occupational therapists as clinical academics are well recognised. They include improved healthcare outcomes and experiences for service users, efficiencies for organisations and increased prominence of occupational therapy within healthcare. Yet occupational therapists describe uncertainty about how best to navigate clinical academic career pathways. We suggest that occupational therapists can increase their research aspirations, confidence and capacity by following a four-step method, weaving together clinical, academic and personal development. We outline our view of clinical academic development as a process with flexibility to incorporate occupational therapists’ diversity of interests and circumstances. By demystifying and illuminating the process of clinical academic development, we believe that occupational therapists may be able to weave more clinical academic development opportunities into their careers and increase the profession’s research capacity. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80296 |
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 82 Issue 1 (Janvier 2019) . - p. 60-64
[article] Weaving a clinical academic career: Illuminating the method and pattern to follow [texte imprimé] / Laura Di Bona ; Becky Field ; Jennifer Read ; Natalie Jones ; Sally Fowler Davis ; Peter Cudd ; Laura Evans . - 2019 . - p. 60-64. doi.org/10.1177/0308022618784258 Langues : Anglais ( eng) in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 82 Issue 1 (Janvier 2019) . - p. 60-64
Mots-clés : |
Research clinical academic professional development research methods and methodology education occupational therapy |
Résumé : |
The benefits of developing occupational therapists as clinical academics are well recognised. They include improved healthcare outcomes and experiences for service users, efficiencies for organisations and increased prominence of occupational therapy within healthcare. Yet occupational therapists describe uncertainty about how best to navigate clinical academic career pathways. We suggest that occupational therapists can increase their research aspirations, confidence and capacity by following a four-step method, weaving together clinical, academic and personal development. We outline our view of clinical academic development as a process with flexibility to incorporate occupational therapists’ diversity of interests and circumstances. By demystifying and illuminating the process of clinical academic development, we believe that occupational therapists may be able to weave more clinical academic development opportunities into their careers and increase the profession’s research capacity. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=80296 |
|  |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |