Determining the minimal clinically important difference of the hand function sort questionnaire in vocational rehabilitation / Zineb Benhissen in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 155-160 Titre : Determining the minimal clinically important difference of the hand function sort questionnaire in vocational rehabilitation Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Zineb Benhissen ; Michel Konzelmann ; Philippe Vuistiner ; Bertrand Leger ; François Luthi ; Charles Benaïm Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 155-160 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.11.003 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Treatment outcome  Surveys and questionnaires  Upper extremity  Recovery of function  Rehabilitation Résumé : Objective To estimate the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of the French version of the Hand Function Sort questionnaire (HFS-F). As a comparison, the MCID of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) was also estimated. Materials and methods We included French-speaking patients hospitalized in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for chronic pain of the upper limb after an accident. HFS-F and DASH scores were collected at admission and discharge; the Patient Global Impression of Change measure (PGIC; 7 levels) was collected at discharge. The MCID was estimated by 2 methods: the anchor-based method (receiver operating characteristic [ROC], delta (Δ) mean of scores) and the objective method based on the distribution of scores (standard error of measurement, SEM). Result We included 225 patients. By the anchor-based method, the MCID for the HFS-F and DASH was +26 (SD 35) (P < 10−4) and −13 (SD 13) (P < 10−4), respectively, and by the ROC curve, it was +10 to +12 for the Δ-HFS-F and −7.5 to −5 for the Δ-DASH. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.726 [0.638–0.781] for Δ-HFS-F and 0.768 [0.701–0.83] for Δ-DASH. The correlations between the anchor and delta scores were > 0.38 (P < 10−4). The SEM was 16.2 for the HFS-F and −4.3 for the DASH. Conclusions Values below the SEM must be rejected. Our anchor was significantly correlated with the outcome. Therefore, we propose an MCID for the HFS-F of 26, corresponding to approximately 10% progression of the score. En ligne : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065718314969 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84113 [article] Determining the minimal clinically important difference of the hand function sort questionnaire in vocational rehabilitation [texte imprimé] / Zineb Benhissen ; Michel Konzelmann ; Philippe Vuistiner ; Bertrand Leger ; François Luthi ; Charles Benaïm . - 2019 . - p. 155-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.11.003 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 155-160 Mots-clés : Treatment outcome  Surveys and questionnaires  Upper extremity  Recovery of function  Rehabilitation Résumé : Objective To estimate the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of the French version of the Hand Function Sort questionnaire (HFS-F). As a comparison, the MCID of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) was also estimated. Materials and methods We included French-speaking patients hospitalized in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for chronic pain of the upper limb after an accident. HFS-F and DASH scores were collected at admission and discharge; the Patient Global Impression of Change measure (PGIC; 7 levels) was collected at discharge. The MCID was estimated by 2 methods: the anchor-based method (receiver operating characteristic [ROC], delta (Δ) mean of scores) and the objective method based on the distribution of scores (standard error of measurement, SEM). Result We included 225 patients. By the anchor-based method, the MCID for the HFS-F and DASH was +26 (SD 35) (P < 10−4) and −13 (SD 13) (P < 10−4), respectively, and by the ROC curve, it was +10 to +12 for the Δ-HFS-F and −7.5 to −5 for the Δ-DASH. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.726 [0.638–0.781] for Δ-HFS-F and 0.768 [0.701–0.83] for Δ-DASH. The correlations between the anchor and delta scores were > 0.38 (P < 10−4). The SEM was 16.2 for the HFS-F and −4.3 for the DASH. Conclusions Values below the SEM must be rejected. Our anchor was significantly correlated with the outcome. Therefore, we propose an MCID for the HFS-F of 26, corresponding to approximately 10% progression of the score. En ligne : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065718314969 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84113

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

Role of pain in measuring shoulder strength abduction and flexion with the Constant–Murley score / Cyrille Burrus in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 60, n° 4 (July 2017)

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 60, n° 4 (July 2017) . - p. 258-262 Titre : Role of pain in measuring shoulder strength abduction and flexion with the Constant–Murley score Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Cyrille Burrus, Auteur ; Olivier Dériaz, Auteur ; François Luthi, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : p. 258-262 Langues : Anglais (eng) Français (fre) Mots-clés : Épaule  Renforcement musculaire  Douleur  Échelle  Échelle douleur  Shoulder,Functional assessment,Strength measures,Induced pain,Constant–Murley score Résumé : Objectives: The Constant–Murley score (CS) has been used for more than 25 years to assess shoulder function. Strength by itself accounts for 25% of the total score. The measurement at 90° abduction seems to be sometimes limited by pain, particularly with tendinopathy or subacromial impingement. We compared the assessment of isometric strength in anterior forward flexion and abduction and its effect on pain and total CS. Methods: Strength was assessed by CS at both 90° forward flexion and abduction in the scapular plane by using an Isobex dynamometer, the first position tested being randomized. Pain was assessed on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and total CS was assessed. Results: We included 54 patients with unilateral shoulder problems; 50% had rotator cuff injury. Mean strength on the affected side was 4.7+2.5kg in forward flexion and 4.6+2.8kg in abduction. Induced pain and total CS did not differ between the 2 positions tested. Conclusions: Strength can be measured by the CS in forward flexion or abduction, because the measurement does not affect strength, pain intensity or total score. The choice of direction for measurement should be based on the underlying pathology, related contraindications and patient preference. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=51691 [article] Role of pain in measuring shoulder strength abduction and flexion with the Constant–Murley score [texte imprimé] / Cyrille Burrus, Auteur ; Olivier Dériaz, Auteur ; François Luthi, Auteur . - 2017 . - p. 258-262. Langues : Anglais (eng) Français (fre) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 60, n° 4 (July 2017) . - p. 258-262 Mots-clés : Épaule  Renforcement musculaire  Douleur  Échelle  Échelle douleur  Shoulder,Functional assessment,Strength measures,Induced pain,Constant–Murley score Résumé : Objectives: The Constant–Murley score (CS) has been used for more than 25 years to assess shoulder function. Strength by itself accounts for 25% of the total score. The measurement at 90° abduction seems to be sometimes limited by pain, particularly with tendinopathy or subacromial impingement. We compared the assessment of isometric strength in anterior forward flexion and abduction and its effect on pain and total CS. Methods: Strength was assessed by CS at both 90° forward flexion and abduction in the scapular plane by using an Isobex dynamometer, the first position tested being randomized. Pain was assessed on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and total CS was assessed. Results: We included 54 patients with unilateral shoulder problems; 50% had rotator cuff injury. Mean strength on the affected side was 4.7+2.5kg in forward flexion and 4.6+2.8kg in abduction. Induced pain and total CS did not differ between the 2 positions tested. Conclusions: Strength can be measured by the CS in forward flexion or abduction, because the measurement does not affect strength, pain intensity or total score. The choice of direction for measurement should be based on the underlying pathology, related contraindications and patient preference. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=51691

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

La sarcopénie : quelle démarche diagnostique et thérapeutique adopter? / François Luthi in Mains libres, n°2 (Juin 2020)  

Public ISBD [article]  inMains libres > n°2 (Juin 2020) . - p. 95-100 Titre : La sarcopénie : quelle démarche diagnostique et thérapeutique adopter? Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : François Luthi ; Michaël Duc Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : p. 95-100 Langues : Français (fre) Mots-clés : arcopénie  force  masse musculaire  exercice En ligne : https://www.mainslibres.ch/mains-libres/2020/mains-libres-2-20/la-sarcopenie-que [...] Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=92486 [article] La sarcopénie : quelle démarche diagnostique et thérapeutique adopter? [texte imprimé] / François Luthi ; Michaël Duc . - 2020 . - p. 95-100. Langues : Français (fre) in Mains libres > n°2 (Juin 2020) . - p. 95-100 Mots-clés : arcopénie  force  masse musculaire  exercice En ligne : https://www.mainslibres.ch/mains-libres/2020/mains-libres-2-20/la-sarcopenie-que [...] Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=92486

Exemplaires

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
aucun exemplaire

Transcultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility 12-item Short-Form (PLUS-M/FC-12) in active amputees / Christos Karatzios in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 142-148 Titre : Transcultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility 12-item Short-Form (PLUS-M/FC-12) in active amputees Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Christos Karatzios ; Isabelle Loiret ; François Luthi ; Bertrand Leger ; Joane Le Carre ; Mathieu Saubade ; Guillaume Muff ; Charles Benaïm Année de publication : 2019 Article en page(s) : p. 142-148 Note générale : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.02.006 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Lower limb amputation  Rehabilitation  Mobility  Assessment  Validation  Self-questionnaire Résumé : Background The PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form is a self-questionnaire that assesses the perceived capacity of lower limb amputees (LLAs) to perform a number of daily-life activities. Its psychometric properties are excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.9, fast administration and scoring, normative data available), and it can be used in clinical practice or for research purposes. Objective We aimed to develop a French version of this questionnaire and to assess its psychometric properties. Methods We followed international recommendations for translation and cross-cultural validation of questionnaires. In total, 52 LLAs (age 53 ± 16, 40 males, 28/12/12 transtibial/Gritti-Stokes/transfemoral, 20/28/4 ischemic/traumatic/other) participated. Criterion and construct validities were assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) between the PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form and other constructs (Prosthetic-Profile-of-the-Amputee-Locomotor Capabilities Index, Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, 2-min walking test and Timed Up and Go test), internal consistency with the Cronbach α and reliability with the ICC in 46 individuals who completed the questionnaire twice in a 7-day interval. Results The mean (SD) PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form T-score was 56.1 (7.8; range 40.3 to 71.4). Construct and criterion validity, internal consistency and reliability ranged from low to excellent (r = 0.43 to 0.84, P < 10−2 to 0.002; Cronbach α = 0.90, ICC = 0.89 [0.81–0.94]). We found no floor or ceiling effect. Conclusions The French version of the PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form has good to excellent psychometric properties, comparable to those of the original version. Its use could definitely be proposed for both clinical and research purposes, once its validation is completed by assessing other psychometric qualities, especially sensitivity to change. En ligne : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065719300363 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84111 [article] Transcultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility 12-item Short-Form (PLUS-M/FC-12) in active amputees [texte imprimé] / Christos Karatzios ; Isabelle Loiret ; François Luthi ; Bertrand Leger ; Joane Le Carre ; Mathieu Saubade ; Guillaume Muff ; Charles Benaïm . - 2019 . - p. 142-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2019.02.006 Langues : Anglais (eng) in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 62, n°3 (Mai 2019) . - p. 142-148 Mots-clés : Lower limb amputation  Rehabilitation  Mobility  Assessment  Validation  Self-questionnaire Résumé : Background The PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form is a self-questionnaire that assesses the perceived capacity of lower limb amputees (LLAs) to perform a number of daily-life activities. Its psychometric properties are excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.9, fast administration and scoring, normative data available), and it can be used in clinical practice or for research purposes. Objective We aimed to develop a French version of this questionnaire and to assess its psychometric properties. Methods We followed international recommendations for translation and cross-cultural validation of questionnaires. In total, 52 LLAs (age 53 ± 16, 40 males, 28/12/12 transtibial/Gritti-Stokes/transfemoral, 20/28/4 ischemic/traumatic/other) participated. Criterion and construct validities were assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) between the PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form and other constructs (Prosthetic-Profile-of-the-Amputee-Locomotor Capabilities Index, Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, 2-min walking test and Timed Up and Go test), internal consistency with the Cronbach α and reliability with the ICC in 46 individuals who completed the questionnaire twice in a 7-day interval. Results The mean (SD) PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form T-score was 56.1 (7.8; range 40.3 to 71.4). Construct and criterion validity, internal consistency and reliability ranged from low to excellent (r = 0.43 to 0.84, P < 10−2 to 0.002; Cronbach α = 0.90, ICC = 0.89 [0.81–0.94]). We found no floor or ceiling effect. Conclusions The French version of the PLUS-M 12-item Short-Form has good to excellent psychometric properties, comparable to those of the original version. Its use could definitely be proposed for both clinical and research purposes, once its validation is completed by assessing other psychometric qualities, especially sensitivity to change. En ligne : https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065719300363 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=84111

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

---

1 (1 - 4 / 4)