Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Jean-Luc Leguiet |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Return to drive after non-evolutive brain damage: French recommendations / Anne-Claire D'APOLITO in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 60, n° 4 (July 2017)
[article]
Titre : Return to drive after non-evolutive brain damage: French recommendations Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Anne-Claire D'APOLITO, Auteur ; Michel Enjalbert, Auteur ; Jean-Luc Leguiet, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : p. 263-269 Langues : Anglais (eng) Français (fre) Mots-clés : Norme soins Accident cérébrovasculaire Traumatisme crânien Conduite automobile Automobile driving,Recommendations,Acquired brain damage,Traumatic brain injury,Stroke Résumé : Return to drive after brain damage is a crucial question either for patients than health professionals. The Société française de medicine physique et de réadaptation (SOFMER) and Comète France association developed recommandations for patient's identification, evaluation and accompaniment as part of their project to resume to drive. The place of rehabilitation process and patient's focus has been also discussed.
Aims: Using a literature review, the aim was to define clinical pathways to determine people who need a fitness to drive evaluation after a non-evolutive brain damage as well as the assessment process.
Method: Following the method for Clinical practice guidelines, 1388 abstracts were identified, among which 379 were analysed and confronted with the working group's experience. The draft propositions were submitted to a review group before being validated by the High French Health Autority.
Result: No article enabled the development of recommendations above the “expert opinion”. The detection of sensory (visual), sensitive, motor and/or cognitive sequelaes is needed before return to drive. It is not recommended to return to drive in case of unilateral spatial neglect. Different assessment strategies, function of sequeale's gravity, are proposed after stroke or brain injury. In case of sequeale, the assessment process (clinical, cognitive, on road evaluation) has to be pluriprofessional. The results are the subject of a pluriprofessional synthesis, shared with the patient and, if possible, in the presence of a close. An accompaniment to maintain the best mobility of the person is needed, whatever the assessment result.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=51689
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 60, n° 4 (July 2017) . - p. 263-269[article] Return to drive after non-evolutive brain damage: French recommendations [texte imprimé] / Anne-Claire D'APOLITO, Auteur ; Michel Enjalbert, Auteur ; Jean-Luc Leguiet, Auteur . - 2017 . - p. 263-269.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Français (fre)
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 60, n° 4 (July 2017) . - p. 263-269
Mots-clés : Norme soins Accident cérébrovasculaire Traumatisme crânien Conduite automobile Automobile driving,Recommendations,Acquired brain damage,Traumatic brain injury,Stroke Résumé : Return to drive after brain damage is a crucial question either for patients than health professionals. The Société française de medicine physique et de réadaptation (SOFMER) and Comète France association developed recommandations for patient's identification, evaluation and accompaniment as part of their project to resume to drive. The place of rehabilitation process and patient's focus has been also discussed.
Aims: Using a literature review, the aim was to define clinical pathways to determine people who need a fitness to drive evaluation after a non-evolutive brain damage as well as the assessment process.
Method: Following the method for Clinical practice guidelines, 1388 abstracts were identified, among which 379 were analysed and confronted with the working group's experience. The draft propositions were submitted to a review group before being validated by the High French Health Autority.
Result: No article enabled the development of recommendations above the “expert opinion”. The detection of sensory (visual), sensitive, motor and/or cognitive sequelaes is needed before return to drive. It is not recommended to return to drive in case of unilateral spatial neglect. Different assessment strategies, function of sequeale's gravity, are proposed after stroke or brain injury. In case of sequeale, the assessment process (clinical, cognitive, on road evaluation) has to be pluriprofessional. The results are the subject of a pluriprofessional synthesis, shared with the patient and, if possible, in the presence of a close. An accompaniment to maintain the best mobility of the person is needed, whatever the assessment result.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=51689 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt