Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Votre centre de documentation fermera de 12h30 à 13h ce vendredi 28 juin et fermera à 14h30.
Dès ce lundi 1er juillet jusqu'au mercredi 10 juillet l'horaire du centre de documentation sera adapté :
Lundi 1er juillet : de 8h à 12h et de 12h30 à 16h
Mardi 2 juillet : de 8h à 12h15
Mercredi 3 juillet : de 9h à 12h et de 12h30 à 15h15
Jeudi 4 juillet : de 8h à 12h30 et de 13h à 18h30
Lundi 8 juillet : de 8h à 12h et de 12h30 à 16h
Mardi 9 juillet : de 8h à 12h15
Mercredi 10 juillet : de 9h à 11h
Réouverture dès ce lundi 19 août.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Votre centre de documentation fermera de 12h30 à 13h ce vendredi 28 juin et fermera à 14h30.
Dès ce lundi 1er juillet jusqu'au mercredi 10 juillet l'horaire du centre de documentation sera adapté :
Lundi 1er juillet : de 8h à 12h et de 12h30 à 16h
Mardi 2 juillet : de 8h à 12h15
Mercredi 3 juillet : de 9h à 12h et de 12h30 à 15h15
Jeudi 4 juillet : de 8h à 12h30 et de 13h à 18h30
Lundi 8 juillet : de 8h à 12h et de 12h30 à 16h
Mardi 9 juillet : de 8h à 12h15
Mercredi 10 juillet : de 9h à 11h
Réouverture dès ce lundi 19 août.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Sébastien Girold |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
![](./images/expand_all.gif)
![](./images/collapse_all.gif)
![Tris disponibles](./images/orderby_az.gif)
Nordic walking versus walking without poles for rehabilitation with cardiovascular disease: Randomized controlled trial / Sébastien Girold in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 60, n° 4 (July 2017)
[article]
Titre : Nordic walking versus walking without poles for rehabilitation with cardiovascular disease: Randomized controlled trial Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Sébastien Girold, Auteur ; Magalie Le Gal, Auteur ; Jérome Rousseau, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : p. 223-229 Langues : Anglais (eng) Français (fre) Mots-clés : Rééducation fonctionnelle Appareil circulatoire [pathologie] Mouvement corporel Test Randomisation Rehabilitation,Cardiovascular disease,Nordic walking,6-min walk test Résumé : Background: With Nordic walking, or walking with poles, one can travel a greater distance and at a higher rate than with walking without poles, but whether the activity is beneficial for patients with cardiovascular disease is unknown.
Objective: This randomized controlled trial was undertaken to determine whether Nordic walking was more effective than walking without poles on walk distance to support rehabilitation training for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD).
Methods: Patients were recruited in a private specialized rehabilitation centre for cardiovascular diseases. The entire protocol, including patient recruitment, took place over 2 months, from September to October 2013. We divided patients into 2 groups: Nordic Walking Group (NWG, n =21) and Walking Group without poles (WG, n =21). All patients followed the same program over 4 weeks, except for the walk performed with or without poles. The main outcome was walk distance on the 6-min walk test. Secondary outcomes were maximum heart rate during exercise and walk distance and power output on a treadmill stress test.
Results: We included 42 patients (35 men; mean age 57.2+11 years and BMI 26.5+4.5kg/m2). At the end of the training period, both groups showed improved walk distance on the 6-min walk test and treatment stress test as well as power on the treadmill stress test (P <0.05). The NWG showed significantly greater walk distance than the WG (P <0.05). Both ACS and PAOD groups showed improvement, but improvement was significant for only PAOD patients.
Conclusions: After a 4-week training period, Nordic walking training appeared more efficient than training without poles for increasing walk distance on the 6-min walk test for patients with ACS and PAOD.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=51681
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 60, n° 4 (July 2017) . - p. 223-229[article] Nordic walking versus walking without poles for rehabilitation with cardiovascular disease: Randomized controlled trial [texte imprimé] / Sébastien Girold, Auteur ; Magalie Le Gal, Auteur ; Jérome Rousseau, Auteur . - 2017 . - p. 223-229.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Français (fre)
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 60, n° 4 (July 2017) . - p. 223-229
Mots-clés : Rééducation fonctionnelle Appareil circulatoire [pathologie] Mouvement corporel Test Randomisation Rehabilitation,Cardiovascular disease,Nordic walking,6-min walk test Résumé : Background: With Nordic walking, or walking with poles, one can travel a greater distance and at a higher rate than with walking without poles, but whether the activity is beneficial for patients with cardiovascular disease is unknown.
Objective: This randomized controlled trial was undertaken to determine whether Nordic walking was more effective than walking without poles on walk distance to support rehabilitation training for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD).
Methods: Patients were recruited in a private specialized rehabilitation centre for cardiovascular diseases. The entire protocol, including patient recruitment, took place over 2 months, from September to October 2013. We divided patients into 2 groups: Nordic Walking Group (NWG, n =21) and Walking Group without poles (WG, n =21). All patients followed the same program over 4 weeks, except for the walk performed with or without poles. The main outcome was walk distance on the 6-min walk test. Secondary outcomes were maximum heart rate during exercise and walk distance and power output on a treadmill stress test.
Results: We included 42 patients (35 men; mean age 57.2+11 years and BMI 26.5+4.5kg/m2). At the end of the training period, both groups showed improved walk distance on the 6-min walk test and treatment stress test as well as power on the treadmill stress test (P <0.05). The NWG showed significantly greater walk distance than the WG (P <0.05). Both ACS and PAOD groups showed improvement, but improvement was significant for only PAOD patients.
Conclusions: After a 4-week training period, Nordic walking training appeared more efficient than training without poles for increasing walk distance on the 6-min walk test for patients with ACS and PAOD.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=51681 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt