[article]
| Titre : |
Interrater reliability of Western University’s on-road assessment |
| Titre original : |
Fiabilité interévaluateurs de l’examen pratique de conduite de la Western University |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Sherrilene Classen ; Sarah Krasniuk ; Melissa Knott ; [et al...] |
| Année de publication : |
2016 |
| Article en page(s) : |
p. 317-325 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Mots-clés : |
aptitude à conduire conducteurs à risque sur le plan médical conduite automobile sclérose en plaques |
| Résumé : |
Background.
Little empirical support exists for interrater reliability between evaluators from different backgrounds when assessing on-road outcomes of drivers.
Purpose.
We quantified interrater reliability of on-road outcomes between a certified driving school instructor (DI) and an occupational therapist and certified driver rehabilitation specialist (CDRS).
Method.
Both raters used the Global Rating Score (GRS) with two levels (pass, fail), the GRS with four levels (pass, pass with recommendations, fail remediable, fail), and the priority error rating score (PERS; most frequently occurring on-road errors in priority order) to assess 35 drivers (age, M = 48.31 years, SD = 9.76 years; 40% male; 86% with multiple sclerosis).
Findings.
The DI and occupational therapist CDRS had excellent agreement on the GRS with two levels (κ = .892, p < .0001), GRS with four levels (κ = .952, p < .0001), and the PERS (κ = .847–.902, p < .0001), indicating interrater reliability.
Implications.
This research contributes to empirical support for the on-road assessment. |
| Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47801 |
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(5) (Décembre 2016) . - p. 317-325
[article] Interrater reliability of Western University’s on-road assessment = Fiabilité interévaluateurs de l’examen pratique de conduite de la Western University [texte imprimé] / Sherrilene Classen ; Sarah Krasniuk ; Melissa Knott ; [et al...] . - 2016 . - p. 317-325. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(5) (Décembre 2016) . - p. 317-325
| Mots-clés : |
aptitude à conduire conducteurs à risque sur le plan médical conduite automobile sclérose en plaques |
| Résumé : |
Background.
Little empirical support exists for interrater reliability between evaluators from different backgrounds when assessing on-road outcomes of drivers.
Purpose.
We quantified interrater reliability of on-road outcomes between a certified driving school instructor (DI) and an occupational therapist and certified driver rehabilitation specialist (CDRS).
Method.
Both raters used the Global Rating Score (GRS) with two levels (pass, fail), the GRS with four levels (pass, pass with recommendations, fail remediable, fail), and the priority error rating score (PERS; most frequently occurring on-road errors in priority order) to assess 35 drivers (age, M = 48.31 years, SD = 9.76 years; 40% male; 86% with multiple sclerosis).
Findings.
The DI and occupational therapist CDRS had excellent agreement on the GRS with two levels (κ = .892, p < .0001), GRS with four levels (κ = .952, p < .0001), and the PERS (κ = .847–.902, p < .0001), indicating interrater reliability.
Implications.
This research contributes to empirical support for the on-road assessment. |
| Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47801 |
|  |
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la rechercheInterrater reliability of Western University’s on-road assessment in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83(5) (Décembre 2016)
