Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Jessie Barbin |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
The effects of mirror therapy on pain and motor control of phantom limb in amputees: A systematic review / Jessie Barbin in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, Vol. 59, n° 4 (September 2016)
[article]
Titre : The effects of mirror therapy on pain and motor control of phantom limb in amputees: A systematic review Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Jessie Barbin, Auteur ; V. Seetha, Auteur ; Jean-Marie Casillas, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : p. 270-275 Langues : Anglais (eng) Français (fre) Mots-clés : Douleur Membre Revue sommaire Mirror therapy,Phantom Limb,Amputee Résumé : Background and objective: Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a major problem after limb amputation. Mirror therapy (MT) is a non-pharmacological treatment using representations of movement, the efficacy of which in reducing PLP remains to be clarified. Here, we present the first systematic review on MT efficacy in PLP and phantom limb movement (PLM) in amputees (lower or upper limb).
Methods: A search on Medline, Cochrane Database and Embase, crossing the keywords “Phantom Limb” and “Mirror Therapy” found studies which were read and analyzed according the PRISMA statement.
Results: Twenty studies were selected, 12 on the subject of MT and PLP, 3 on MT and PLM, 5 on MT and both (PLP and PLM). Among these 20 studies, 5 were randomized controlled trials (163 patients), 6 prospective studies (55 patients), 9 case studies (40 patients) and methodologies were heterogeneous. Seventeen of the 18 studies reported the efficacy of MT on PLP, but with low levels of evidence. One randomized controlled trial did not show any significant effect of MT. As to the effect of MT on PLM, the 8 studies concerned reported effectiveness of MT: 4 with a low level of evidence and 4 with a high level of evidence. An alternative to visual illusion seems to be tactile or auditory stimulation.
Conclusion: We cannot recommend MT as a first intention treatment in PLP. The level of evidence is insufficient. Further research is needed to assess the effect of MT on pain, prosthesis use, and body representation, and to standardize protocols.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=45225
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 59, n° 4 (September 2016) . - p. 270-275[article] The effects of mirror therapy on pain and motor control of phantom limb in amputees: A systematic review [texte imprimé] / Jessie Barbin, Auteur ; V. Seetha, Auteur ; Jean-Marie Casillas, Auteur . - 2016 . - p. 270-275.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Français (fre)
in Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine > Vol. 59, n° 4 (September 2016) . - p. 270-275
Mots-clés : Douleur Membre Revue sommaire Mirror therapy,Phantom Limb,Amputee Résumé : Background and objective: Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a major problem after limb amputation. Mirror therapy (MT) is a non-pharmacological treatment using representations of movement, the efficacy of which in reducing PLP remains to be clarified. Here, we present the first systematic review on MT efficacy in PLP and phantom limb movement (PLM) in amputees (lower or upper limb).
Methods: A search on Medline, Cochrane Database and Embase, crossing the keywords “Phantom Limb” and “Mirror Therapy” found studies which were read and analyzed according the PRISMA statement.
Results: Twenty studies were selected, 12 on the subject of MT and PLP, 3 on MT and PLM, 5 on MT and both (PLP and PLM). Among these 20 studies, 5 were randomized controlled trials (163 patients), 6 prospective studies (55 patients), 9 case studies (40 patients) and methodologies were heterogeneous. Seventeen of the 18 studies reported the efficacy of MT on PLP, but with low levels of evidence. One randomized controlled trial did not show any significant effect of MT. As to the effect of MT on PLM, the 8 studies concerned reported effectiveness of MT: 4 with a low level of evidence and 4 with a high level of evidence. An alternative to visual illusion seems to be tactile or auditory stimulation.
Conclusion: We cannot recommend MT as a first intention treatment in PLP. The level of evidence is insufficient. Further research is needed to assess the effect of MT on pain, prosthesis use, and body representation, and to standardize protocols.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=45225 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt