Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Claire Ballinger |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
A critical review of the effectiveness of environmental assessment and modification in the prevention of falls amongst community dwelling older people / Alison Pighills in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol.79 N°3 (March 2016)
[article]
Titre : A critical review of the effectiveness of environmental assessment and modification in the prevention of falls amongst community dwelling older people Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Alison Pighills ; Claire Ballinger ; Ruth Pickering Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : p.133-143 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Environmental assessmen accidental fall older peopl home assessment Résumé : Introduction The potential of environmental assessment and modification to reduce falls has recently received attention within the gerontology literature. Research investigating the clinical effectiveness of this intervention in falls prevention reports conflicting results. Discrepancies are due to variation in the risk profile of study participants and the health care background of the person providing the environmental intervention or the intensity of the intervention provided.
Method The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast two systematic reviews, which include meta-analyses, of environmental interventions for falls prevention in community dwelling older people, using the critical appraisal skills programme tool for systematic reviews.
Findings Both reviews found that: environmental assessment and modification was effective in falls prevention; intervention was effective with high but not low risk participants; and that high intensity environmental assessment was effective, whereas low intensity intervention was not. Environmental interventions which were delivered by occupational therapists were deemed high intensity, probably because their underpinning theoretical frameworks focus on the impact of the environment on function.
Conclusion We discuss possible reasons why occupational therapist led environmental assessment and modification is clinically effective in falls prevention, for people at high risk of falls, whereas non occupational therapist led intervention is not.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=42946
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.79 N°3 (March 2016) . - p.133-143[article] A critical review of the effectiveness of environmental assessment and modification in the prevention of falls amongst community dwelling older people [texte imprimé] / Alison Pighills ; Claire Ballinger ; Ruth Pickering . - 2016 . - p.133-143.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol.79 N°3 (March 2016) . - p.133-143
Mots-clés : Environmental assessmen accidental fall older peopl home assessment Résumé : Introduction The potential of environmental assessment and modification to reduce falls has recently received attention within the gerontology literature. Research investigating the clinical effectiveness of this intervention in falls prevention reports conflicting results. Discrepancies are due to variation in the risk profile of study participants and the health care background of the person providing the environmental intervention or the intensity of the intervention provided.
Method The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast two systematic reviews, which include meta-analyses, of environmental interventions for falls prevention in community dwelling older people, using the critical appraisal skills programme tool for systematic reviews.
Findings Both reviews found that: environmental assessment and modification was effective in falls prevention; intervention was effective with high but not low risk participants; and that high intensity environmental assessment was effective, whereas low intensity intervention was not. Environmental interventions which were delivered by occupational therapists were deemed high intensity, probably because their underpinning theoretical frameworks focus on the impact of the environment on function.
Conclusion We discuss possible reasons why occupational therapist led environmental assessment and modification is clinically effective in falls prevention, for people at high risk of falls, whereas non occupational therapist led intervention is not.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=42946 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtDevelopments in public involvement and co-production in research: Embracing our values and those of our service users and carers / Priscilla Harries in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 83 Issue 1 (Janvier 2020)
[article]
Titre : Developments in public involvement and co-production in research: Embracing our values and those of our service users and carers Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Priscilla Harries ; Duncan Barron ; Claire Ballinger Année de publication : 2020 Article en page(s) : p. 3-5 Note générale : doi.org/10.1177/0308022619844143 Langues : Anglais (eng) Résumé : Public involvement (PI) (also known as patient and public involvement or PPI) refers to professionals and the public working together as equal partners, to ensure high quality research and service provision; it is also sometimes referred to as service user and carer involvement (Pandya-Wood et al., 2019). Many countries began to involve people in health issues following the World Health Organization declaration of Alma-Ata of 1978, which stated that ‘people have the rights and the duty to participate individually and collectively in their health care’ (World Health Organization, 1978: 1). The Rome Declaration on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in Europe (2014) called on all stakeholders to work together, for example, to define research agendas and in the conduct and dissemination of research. The RRI concludes that excellence in research includes ‘openness, responsibility and the co-production of knowledge’ (RRI, 2014: 1). En ligne : https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/0308022619844143 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=85689
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 83 Issue 1 (Janvier 2020) . - p. 3-5[article] Developments in public involvement and co-production in research: Embracing our values and those of our service users and carers [texte imprimé] / Priscilla Harries ; Duncan Barron ; Claire Ballinger . - 2020 . - p. 3-5.
doi.org/10.1177/0308022619844143
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 83 Issue 1 (Janvier 2020) . - p. 3-5
Résumé : Public involvement (PI) (also known as patient and public involvement or PPI) refers to professionals and the public working together as equal partners, to ensure high quality research and service provision; it is also sometimes referred to as service user and carer involvement (Pandya-Wood et al., 2019). Many countries began to involve people in health issues following the World Health Organization declaration of Alma-Ata of 1978, which stated that ‘people have the rights and the duty to participate individually and collectively in their health care’ (World Health Organization, 1978: 1). The Rome Declaration on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in Europe (2014) called on all stakeholders to work together, for example, to define research agendas and in the conduct and dissemination of research. The RRI concludes that excellence in research includes ‘openness, responsibility and the co-production of knowledge’ (RRI, 2014: 1). En ligne : https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/0308022619844143 Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=85689 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt