Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche

[article]
Titre : |
Non-invasive navigation in total knee arthroplasty : a validation study |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Harold Jennart, Auteur |
Année de publication : |
2020 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 434-439 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Résumé : |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate intraope- rative alignment during total knee arthroplasty using a handheld navigation system, iAssist, in comparison with conventional optical surgical navigation.
Sixty-two consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective study. iAssist was used to determine implant component positioning. Orientation of the cuts were verified using a conventional optical sur- gical navigation system. We compared the iAssist system with the conventional system in terms of accuracy, percentage of outliers, bias, and precision.
The occurrence of component malalignment was low. Taking standard radiography as the reference, there were no relevant differences between the handheld device and optical navigation in terms of measure- ment of accuracy or in outlier occurrence. Bias was small for both technologies, and precision was com- parable.
The study provides preliminary evidence that the use of iAssist leads to satisfactory implant alignment. The results from this study imply that iAssist could be a viable alternative to conventional optical navigation. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=92009 |
in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol. 86/3 (Septembre 2020) . - p. 434-439
[article] Non-invasive navigation in total knee arthroplasty : a validation study [texte imprimé] / Harold Jennart, Auteur . - 2020 . - p. 434-439. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol. 86/3 (Septembre 2020) . - p. 434-439
Résumé : |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate intraope- rative alignment during total knee arthroplasty using a handheld navigation system, iAssist, in comparison with conventional optical surgical navigation.
Sixty-two consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective study. iAssist was used to determine implant component positioning. Orientation of the cuts were verified using a conventional optical sur- gical navigation system. We compared the iAssist system with the conventional system in terms of accuracy, percentage of outliers, bias, and precision.
The occurrence of component malalignment was low. Taking standard radiography as the reference, there were no relevant differences between the handheld device and optical navigation in terms of measure- ment of accuracy or in outlier occurrence. Bias was small for both technologies, and precision was com- parable.
The study provides preliminary evidence that the use of iAssist leads to satisfactory implant alignment. The results from this study imply that iAssist could be a viable alternative to conventional optical navigation. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=92009 |
|
Réservation
Réserver ce document
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Disponible Disponible |

[article]
Titre : |
Reliability of patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Harold Jennart ; Marie-Ange Ngo Yamben ; Theofylaktos Kyriakidis |
Année de publication : |
2015 |
Article en page(s) : |
p.668-672 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Résumé : |
The aim of this study was to compare the precision between Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) and Conventional Instrumentation (CI) as determined intra-operatively by a pinless navigation system. Eighty patients were included in this prospective comparative study and they were divided into two homogeneous groups. We defined an original score from 6 to 30 points to evaluate the accuracy of the position of the cutting guides. This score is based on 6 objective criteria. The analysis indicated that PSI was not superior to conventional instrumentation in the overall score (p = 0.949). Moreover, no statistically significant difference was observed for any individual criteria of our score. Level of evidence II. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=42350 |
in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol.81/4 (Décembre 2015) . - p.668-672
[article] Reliability of patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty [texte imprimé] / Harold Jennart ; Marie-Ange Ngo Yamben ; Theofylaktos Kyriakidis . - 2015 . - p.668-672. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol.81/4 (Décembre 2015) . - p.668-672
Résumé : |
The aim of this study was to compare the precision between Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) and Conventional Instrumentation (CI) as determined intra-operatively by a pinless navigation system. Eighty patients were included in this prospective comparative study and they were divided into two homogeneous groups. We defined an original score from 6 to 30 points to evaluate the accuracy of the position of the cutting guides. This score is based on 6 objective criteria. The analysis indicated that PSI was not superior to conventional instrumentation in the overall score (p = 0.949). Moreover, no statistically significant difference was observed for any individual criteria of our score. Level of evidence II. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=42350 |
|  |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Armoires à volets | Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt |