Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Sonia V. EDEN |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Outcomes Of Bilateral Sacroiliac Joint Fusions And The Importance Of Understanding Potential Coexisting Lumbosacral Pathology That Might Also Require Surgical Treatment / Bruce E. DALL in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, Vol 81/2 (Juin 2015)
[article]
Titre : Outcomes Of Bilateral Sacroiliac Joint Fusions And The Importance Of Understanding Potential Coexisting Lumbosacral Pathology That Might Also Require Surgical Treatment Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Bruce E. DALL, Auteur ; Sonia V. EDEN, Auteur Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : p.233-239 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Sacroiliac joint fusion surgery, outcomes bilateral lumbosacral algorithm treatment Résumé : Only one study in the literature describes performing a bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion, and the results were poor. Many patients needing a bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion frequently have had previous lumbosacral surgeries and present with lumbosacral pain as well. This study reviews our results in consecutive patients having had a bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion over a five-year period. Fifteen patients had bilateral sacroiliac joint fusions with 13 having concurrent lumbosacral fusions. The modified posterior midline fascial splitting approach, first described by Belanger was utilized. Patients were followed for an average of 30.3 months. There were no infections, neurovascular injuries, lasting morbidity or deaths. One non-union of a sacroiliac joint (7%) occurred, which after revision was satisfactory. There was a statistically significant drop in pain (p = 0.01488) using the VAS, and patient satisfaction rates were 86%. With all those patients saying they would have the surgery again for the same result. There was no significant increase in functionality. Patients needing bilateral sacroiliac joint fusions frequently fall into the “failed back” category, and it is important to evaluate both the sacroiliac joints and the lumbosacral spine for potential pain generators. This study shows that by treating all the pain generators in both areas there were significant decreases in pain, low complications, low re-operation rates, and high patient satisfaction scores. Overall functionality, however, was not positively affected. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=40565
in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol 81/2 (Juin 2015) . - p.233-239[article] Outcomes Of Bilateral Sacroiliac Joint Fusions And The Importance Of Understanding Potential Coexisting Lumbosacral Pathology That Might Also Require Surgical Treatment [texte imprimé] / Bruce E. DALL, Auteur ; Sonia V. EDEN, Auteur . - 2015 . - p.233-239.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Acta Orthopaedica Belgica > Vol 81/2 (Juin 2015) . - p.233-239
Mots-clés : Sacroiliac joint fusion surgery, outcomes bilateral lumbosacral algorithm treatment Résumé : Only one study in the literature describes performing a bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion, and the results were poor. Many patients needing a bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion frequently have had previous lumbosacral surgeries and present with lumbosacral pain as well. This study reviews our results in consecutive patients having had a bilateral sacroiliac joint fusion over a five-year period. Fifteen patients had bilateral sacroiliac joint fusions with 13 having concurrent lumbosacral fusions. The modified posterior midline fascial splitting approach, first described by Belanger was utilized. Patients were followed for an average of 30.3 months. There were no infections, neurovascular injuries, lasting morbidity or deaths. One non-union of a sacroiliac joint (7%) occurred, which after revision was satisfactory. There was a statistically significant drop in pain (p = 0.01488) using the VAS, and patient satisfaction rates were 86%. With all those patients saying they would have the surgery again for the same result. There was no significant increase in functionality. Patients needing bilateral sacroiliac joint fusions frequently fall into the “failed back” category, and it is important to evaluate both the sacroiliac joints and the lumbosacral spine for potential pain generators. This study shows that by treating all the pain generators in both areas there were significant decreases in pain, low complications, low re-operation rates, and high patient satisfaction scores. Overall functionality, however, was not positively affected. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=40565 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt