Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Matthew Smith |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection? / Matthew Smith in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Volume 78 numéro 2 (Fébrier 2015)
[article]
Titre : Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection? Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Matthew Smith, Auteur ; Callum D. Mole, Auteur ; Georgios K. Kountouriotis, Auteur Année de publication : 2015 Article en page(s) : p. 85-95 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Stroke Hemianopia Driving Visual field Visual search Hazard detection Reaction times Compensation Résumé : Introduction Stroke often causes homonymous visual field loss, which can lead to exclusion from driving. Retention of a driving licence is sometimes possible by completing an on-road assessment, but this is not practical for all. It is important to find simple tests that can inform the assessment and rehabilitation of driving-related visual-motor function.
Method We developed novel computerised assessments: visual search; simple reaction and decision reaction to appearing pedestrians; and pedestrian detection during simulated driving. We tested 12 patients with stroke (seven left, five right field loss) and 12 controls.
Results The homonymous visual field defect group was split into adequately compensated or inadequately compensated groups based on visual search performance. The inadequately compensated group had problems with stimuli in their affected field: they tended to react more slowly than controls and in the driving task they failed to detect a number of pedestrians. In contrast, the adequately compensated group were better at detecting pedestrians, though reaction times were slightly slower than controls.
Conclusion We suggest that our search task can predict, to a limited extent, whether a person with stroke compensates for visual field loss, and may potentially identify suitability for specific rehabilitation to promote return to driving.En ligne : http://bjo.sagepub.com/content/78/2.toc Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=35927
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Volume 78 numéro 2 (Fébrier 2015) . - p. 85-95[article] Driving with homonymous visual field loss: Does visual search performance predict hazard detection? [texte imprimé] / Matthew Smith, Auteur ; Callum D. Mole, Auteur ; Georgios K. Kountouriotis, Auteur . - 2015 . - p. 85-95.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Volume 78 numéro 2 (Fébrier 2015) . - p. 85-95
Mots-clés : Stroke Hemianopia Driving Visual field Visual search Hazard detection Reaction times Compensation Résumé : Introduction Stroke often causes homonymous visual field loss, which can lead to exclusion from driving. Retention of a driving licence is sometimes possible by completing an on-road assessment, but this is not practical for all. It is important to find simple tests that can inform the assessment and rehabilitation of driving-related visual-motor function.
Method We developed novel computerised assessments: visual search; simple reaction and decision reaction to appearing pedestrians; and pedestrian detection during simulated driving. We tested 12 patients with stroke (seven left, five right field loss) and 12 controls.
Results The homonymous visual field defect group was split into adequately compensated or inadequately compensated groups based on visual search performance. The inadequately compensated group had problems with stimuli in their affected field: they tended to react more slowly than controls and in the driving task they failed to detect a number of pedestrians. In contrast, the adequately compensated group were better at detecting pedestrians, though reaction times were slightly slower than controls.
Conclusion We suggest that our search task can predict, to a limited extent, whether a person with stroke compensates for visual field loss, and may potentially identify suitability for specific rehabilitation to promote return to driving.En ligne : http://bjo.sagepub.com/content/78/2.toc Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=35927 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt