One- and three-screen driving simulator approaches to evaluate driving capacity / Carrie GIBBONS in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 68/3 (mai-juin 2014)

Public ISBD [article]  inAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 68/3 (mai-juin 2014) . - 344-352 Titre : One- and three-screen driving simulator approaches to evaluate driving capacity : evidence of congruence and participants' endorsement Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Carrie GIBBONS ; Nadia Mullen ; Bruce Weaver ; et al. Année de publication : 2014 Article en page(s) : 344-352 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Conduite automobile  Simulation  Ordinateur Résumé : OBJECTIVE: We examined the validity of one-screen versus three-screen driving simulators and their acceptability to middle-aged and older drivers. METHOD: Participants aged 40-55 or 65 and older (N = 32) completed simulated drives first with a single monitor and then with a three-monitor setup, followed by pen-and-paper measures and an interview. RESULTS: Mean differences between one- and three-screen drives were not statistically significant for Starting/Stopping and Passing/Speed. Correlations between the two drives indicated moderate positive linear relationships with moderate agreement. More errors occurred on the one-screen simulator for Signal Violation/Right of Way/Inattention, Moving in a Roadway, Turning, and Total Scores. However, for Moving in a Roadway, Turning, and Total Scores, correlations between drives indicated strong positive linear relationships. We found no meaningful correlation between workload, computer comfort, simulator discomfort, and performance on either drive. Participants found driving simulators acceptable. CONCLUSION: Findings support the use of one-screen simulators. Participants were favorable regarding driving simulators for assessment. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=33770 [article] One- and three-screen driving simulator approaches to evaluate driving capacity : evidence of congruence and participants' endorsement [texte imprimé] / Carrie GIBBONS ; Nadia Mullen ; Bruce Weaver ; et al. . - 2014 . - 344-352. Langues : Anglais (eng) in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 68/3 (mai-juin 2014) . - 344-352 Mots-clés : Conduite automobile  Simulation  Ordinateur Résumé : OBJECTIVE: We examined the validity of one-screen versus three-screen driving simulators and their acceptability to middle-aged and older drivers. METHOD: Participants aged 40-55 or 65 and older (N = 32) completed simulated drives first with a single monitor and then with a three-monitor setup, followed by pen-and-paper measures and an interview. RESULTS: Mean differences between one- and three-screen drives were not statistically significant for Starting/Stopping and Passing/Speed. Correlations between the two drives indicated moderate positive linear relationships with moderate agreement. More errors occurred on the one-screen simulator for Signal Violation/Right of Way/Inattention, Moving in a Roadway, Turning, and Total Scores. However, for Moving in a Roadway, Turning, and Total Scores, correlations between drives indicated strong positive linear relationships. We found no meaningful correlation between workload, computer comfort, simulator discomfort, and performance on either drive. Participants found driving simulators acceptable. CONCLUSION: Findings support the use of one-screen simulators. Participants were favorable regarding driving simulators for assessment. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=33770

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

Using Serial Trichotomization With Common Cognitive Tests to Screen for Fitness to Drive. / Carrie GIBBONS in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 71/2 (2017)

Public ISBD [article]  inAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 71/2 (2017) . - pp.1-8 Titre : Using Serial Trichotomization With Common Cognitive Tests to Screen for Fitness to Drive. Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Carrie GIBBONS, Auteur ; Nathan Smith, Auteur ; Randy Middleton, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : pp.1-8 Langues : Américain (ame) Mots-clés : Conduite automobile  Troubles de la cognition  Évaluation des résultats des patients  Tests neuropsychologiques Résumé : OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to illustrate the use of serial trichotomization with five common tests of cognition to achieve greater precision in screening for fitness to drive. METHOD. We collected data (using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Motor-Free Visual Perception Test, Clock-Drawing Test, Trail Making Test Part A and B [Trails B], and an on-road driving test) from 83 people referred for a driving evaluation. We identified cutpoints for 100% sensitivity and specificity for each test; the driving test was the gold standard. Using serial trichotomization, we classified drivers as either "Pass," "Fail," or "Indeterminate." RESULTS. Trails B had the best sensitivity and specificity (66.3% of participants correctly classified). After applying serial trichotomization, we correctly identified the driving test outcome for 78.3% of participants. CONCLUSION. A screening strategy using serial trichotomization of multiple test results may reduce uncertainty about fitness to drive. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=49282 [article] Using Serial Trichotomization With Common Cognitive Tests to Screen for Fitness to Drive. [texte imprimé] / Carrie GIBBONS, Auteur ; Nathan Smith, Auteur ; Randy Middleton, Auteur . - 2017 . - pp.1-8. Langues : Américain (ame) in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 71/2 (2017) . - pp.1-8 Mots-clés : Conduite automobile  Troubles de la cognition  Évaluation des résultats des patients  Tests neuropsychologiques Résumé : OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to illustrate the use of serial trichotomization with five common tests of cognition to achieve greater precision in screening for fitness to drive. METHOD. We collected data (using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Motor-Free Visual Perception Test, Clock-Drawing Test, Trail Making Test Part A and B [Trails B], and an on-road driving test) from 83 people referred for a driving evaluation. We identified cutpoints for 100% sensitivity and specificity for each test; the driving test was the gold standard. Using serial trichotomization, we classified drivers as either "Pass," "Fail," or "Indeterminate." RESULTS. Trails B had the best sensitivity and specificity (66.3% of participants correctly classified). After applying serial trichotomization, we correctly identified the driving test outcome for 78.3% of participants. CONCLUSION. A screening strategy using serial trichotomization of multiple test results may reduce uncertainty about fitness to drive. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=49282

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Armoires à volets	Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place Exclu du prêt

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)